Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Leverage and the Next MEC Decision >

Leverage and the Next MEC Decision

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Leverage and the Next MEC Decision

Old 01-01-2012, 03:43 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Posts: 426
Default

Thorough, well articulated post.

Thought about putting this at JetFlyers??
Lindy is offline  
Old 01-01-2012, 04:11 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Unknown Rider's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Position: Bent Over
Posts: 531
Default

Originally Posted by Lindy View Post
Thorough, well articulated post.

Thought about putting this at JetFlyers??

Are you talking about Albie or Magic Rat?
Unknown Rider is offline  
Old 01-01-2012, 09:34 AM
  #13  
On Reserve
 
Ricky's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: B-757 Left Seat
Posts: 13
Default Leverage

Gentlemen, et al:
May I propose we are a guild, not a true union. FDX/ALPA defends common interest, in general, and that is the extent of unity. When we stand side by side, shoulder to shoulder, and focus on the interest of the many, at the sacrifice of a few, we will then become a true union. Unfortunately we do the opposite.
It is a leadership issue; so goes the head, so goes the rest of the body.
So I ponder, who is our center of gravity to counter management's center of gravity? Answer this question and you will have the leverage you seek.
I hope the New Year brings all good things to us.
Ricky
Ricky is offline  
Old 01-01-2012, 12:54 PM
  #14  
Line Holder
 
CAVU's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 89
Default

Originally Posted by Albief15 View Post
We have a chance now, however, to do something relatively unique, and that is to work forward in a more business like manner reducing the risk to our careers, adding money right now to our paychecks, while still preserving our rights to improve our contract going forward.
Spot on, and a great historical recap. One could go all the way back to the rejection of the first ALPA contract (pre-FPA) and reach the same conclusion regarding flawed decision making and missed opportunities.
CAVU is offline  
Old 01-01-2012, 04:49 PM
  #15  
Ok, No more sleeping Dog
 
FLMD11CAPT's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: MD-11, F/O
Posts: 889
Default

Well done Albie. As is manifest; I totally agree, lets take the 3% and let our reps know indisputably that this is what we want......
FLMD11CAPT is offline  
Old 01-01-2012, 04:57 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Albief15's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2006
Posts: 2,889
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG View Post
My perspective, if the Myans are right we need to take the 3% now.
I also use this argument frequently with my bride as I propose we better "knock one out..." every chance we can. I gather she isn't nearly as afraid of the apocalypse as I think she should be....
Albief15 is offline  
Old 01-01-2012, 05:01 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
KnightFlyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,433
Default

China's Jade Cargo grounds planes on weak demand

China's Jade Cargo International Company Ltd. said Saturday that it had temporarily grounded its fleet of six Boeing 747 freighter planes because of weak demand.

The joint venture between a unit of carrier Air China Ltd. and Deutsche Lufthansa AG is the latest victim of the slowdown in air cargo traffic from China as customers pare orders because of the wider uncertainty over the global economy.

Jade said in a statement on its website that the move would provide an opportunity to "continue with the restructuring of the company's financial structure".

The company was set up in 2004 by Shenzhen Airlines -- now a unit of Air China -- Lufthansa and a German development bank.

Jade's future has been in question since Air China acquired Shenzhen. The Chinese flag carrier has a fast-growing cargo joint venture with Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd. (CPCAY, 0293.HK).

Cathay is among a number of carriers to forecast weaker cargo demand next year, scaling back expansion plans for 2012 and delaying the arrival of new aircraft.
KnightFlyer is offline  
Old 01-01-2012, 07:40 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,931
Default

Originally Posted by Albief15 View Post
The biggest sticking point in this thread seems to be the amount of “leverage” we have at the moment, and how much we anticipate having if we go straight to section 6.

This is where I think a little history is in order. I’ll offer up some past events where it appeared we had leverage and what the results really were.
Your perspective is worth a lot. Thanks. Aggressive leadership does not always equal more gains.

Sometimes we thought we had more leverage than we did.

Other times we some but didn't know(care?) - First FDA LOA.

The EU is forecast to contract further. Germany, the big growth engine, is finally slowing. Does that make it a bad time to go to section 6? Don't know. Just another data point for those who've told me otherwise. The good news is the domestic economy is forecast to grow.
Gunter is offline  
Old 01-01-2012, 08:12 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NoHaz's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: let it snow, let it snow, let it snow
Posts: 828
Default

I don't think the decision makers on the company side are ready to make any deals or decisions until they have a better handle on world economic growth and post 2012 election business climate. So, I think our choices are
1. take 3% and work towards a new contract in a few years
2. refuse the 3%, company negotiaters stall and we get a new contract in a few years
NoHaz is offline  
Old 01-02-2012, 12:24 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ANCFRTDG's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 174
Default

Great post by Albie and Magic Rat!
Without unity we have no leverage!
767 lanyards seen already! Well that about sums it up!
Guys STILL *****ing about the over 65 year old retirement.
WE HAVE NO UNITY AS A PILOT GROUP thus NO LEVERAGE.
Take the 3% and try and to work on some of the non essential sections of our contract.
Maybe one day something will come along to unify us?

Last edited by ANCFRTDG; 01-02-2012 at 12:26 AM. Reason: changed wording
ANCFRTDG is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices