ATI CCIA merger
08-26-2012, 12:41 PM
#13
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 75
The pilot group cannot stop the merger according two both MEC's a few months ago. ATSG can merge the two companies reguard less of the out come of the vote. I'm waiting for the road show before I pick a side. CCIA has some FAA fines that most be paid or the certificate surrendered. I don't see Wilmington paying the FAA.
08-26-2012, 07:14 PM
#15
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Bus
Posts: 768
Originally Posted by 757niteflyer
Stop the merger and see what happens, CCIA is growing in the black, ATI is shrinking deep in the Red, not really hard to tell, but take your career in your own hands, stop the merger
08-26-2012, 09:01 PM
#16
Line Holder
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 34
Originally Posted by EMD1594
The pilot group cannot stop the merger according two both MEC's a few months ago. ATSG can merge the two companies reguard less of the out come of the vote. I'm waiting for the road show before I pick a side. CCIA has some FAA fines that most be paid or the certificate surrendered. I don't see Wilmington paying the FAA.
08-26-2012, 09:06 PM
#17
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: Capt
Posts: 221
Originally Posted by capitalairtrans
What fines would those be exactly? Exact amount of the fines would be great, thank you!
The U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is proposing a $298,500 civil penalty against Capital Cargo International Airlines, Inc. (CCIA) of Orlando, Fla., for allegedly operating eight Boeing 727 aircraft when the aircraft were not in compliance with federal aviation regulations.
Specifically, the FAA alleges that CCIA permitted an unqualified mechanic to perform certain aircraft inspections and to sign airworthiness releases on the company’s aircraft. The FAA said the certificated mechanic in question had not completed a required general familiarization course for the B-727 and did not have prior training or experience equivalent to that course. The FAA also said the mechanic had not taken the required examination and the company had not evaluated his prior experience and training to perform required inspections on the B-727. As a result, he was not qualified to work on the B-727.
As a consequence, CCIA operated the aircraft on 46 flights in 2008 and 2009 while they were not in compliance with federal aviation regulations.
The FAA also alleges that the same mechanic performed required inspections on one B-727 on March 13, 17 and 19, 2009, when he was not qualified to do so. As a result, the company operated that aircraft on 463 revenue flights when it was not in compliance.
CCIA has 30 days from the receipt of the FAA’s enforcement letter to respond to the Agency.
Another article:
FAA proposes fine against Orlando-based Capital Cargo
By Aaron Karp | August 31, 2011
Last edited by airbus300; 08-26-2012 at 09:30 PM.
08-26-2012, 09:19 PM
#18
Line Holder
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 34
That was 2009, do you think those might have been mitigated by fall of 2012? How much do you think ATI will have to pay to get the tail fixed after that recent tailstrike? I'm hearing that incident is now being classified as an accident?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
