ATI CCIA merger
#22
Line Holder
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 99
In any merger, there will be individuals who think they came out a little bit better or worse. Most people will accept that as long as they feel like the process used is basically fair and unbiased.
When the lists are merged anybody who is furloughed when the music stops goes into the furlough pool. The furloughed ATI pilots have up to 2 years of seniority but they are at the top of the FO pay scale because they were at another ATSG carrier for at least 12 years. They have seniority based on the date they started at ATI but they have 12 year pay because of a benefit that was negotiated with ATSG.
It looks like ATSG is manipulating the process in order to reduce labor costs. If the two pilot groups are combined, ATSG management will prefer to have Capital pilots on the active list at year 1 or 2 on the pay scale than ATI pilots at year 12. So they wait until just before it will go into effect then furlough more ATI pilots and recall some Capital pilots.
I want to see the Capital pilots get their pay raise. If nothing else, it's a little bit of whipsaw insurance. They also deserve to be paid better. Even if I personally have nothing to gain, I would vote yes just for the benefit of Capital men and women. However, I will not vote for and support a process that punishes more long-term ATSG pilots for the crime of having worked for an ATSG carrier for a longer period of time. Those guys are being rewarded for their loyalty with unemployment. I say NO NO NO.
When the lists are merged anybody who is furloughed when the music stops goes into the furlough pool. The furloughed ATI pilots have up to 2 years of seniority but they are at the top of the FO pay scale because they were at another ATSG carrier for at least 12 years. They have seniority based on the date they started at ATI but they have 12 year pay because of a benefit that was negotiated with ATSG.
It looks like ATSG is manipulating the process in order to reduce labor costs. If the two pilot groups are combined, ATSG management will prefer to have Capital pilots on the active list at year 1 or 2 on the pay scale than ATI pilots at year 12. So they wait until just before it will go into effect then furlough more ATI pilots and recall some Capital pilots.
I want to see the Capital pilots get their pay raise. If nothing else, it's a little bit of whipsaw insurance. They also deserve to be paid better. Even if I personally have nothing to gain, I would vote yes just for the benefit of Capital men and women. However, I will not vote for and support a process that punishes more long-term ATSG pilots for the crime of having worked for an ATSG carrier for a longer period of time. Those guys are being rewarded for their loyalty with unemployment. I say NO NO NO.
#24
Line Holder
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 34
Two honest questions, not that honesty can ever exist on a anonymous internet message board, but I can't wrap my mind around these things.
1: What will voting the contract down accomplish?
2: After voting it down what do you think will happen? Do you honestly think Hete will "thrown money at it"? Did he now furlough 30 over at ABX because of 18 hour duty days and loss of work because of it?
1: What will voting the contract down accomplish?
2: After voting it down what do you think will happen? Do you honestly think Hete will "thrown money at it"? Did he now furlough 30 over at ABX because of 18 hour duty days and loss of work because of it?
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Apelo@290
Posts: 345
Two honest questions, not that honesty can ever exist on a anonymous internet message board, but I can't wrap my mind around these things.
1: What will voting the contract down accomplish?
2: After voting it down what do you think will happen? Do you honestly think Hete will "thrown money at it"? Did he now furlough 30 over at ABX because of 18 hour duty days and loss of work because of it?
1: What will voting the contract down accomplish?
2: After voting it down what do you think will happen? Do you honestly think Hete will "thrown money at it"? Did he now furlough 30 over at ABX because of 18 hour duty days and loss of work because of it?
2. Not sure, but since ATI has passenger capability, ETOPS, Cat 2 (Cat 3 next week) and authority to fly almost anywhere in the world I like our odds. Basically we can do what Cappy does, but they can't do what we do. You do the math- do you really see the ATI certificate being surrendered in favor of Cappy's?
#28
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post