Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Worst Cargo Airlines to fly for (Pay,QOL,ETC) >

Worst Cargo Airlines to fly for (Pay,QOL,ETC)

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Worst Cargo Airlines to fly for (Pay,QOL,ETC)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-08-2013, 12:06 PM
  #41  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: looking for a bridge to sleep under in ANC
Posts: 180
Default

Originally Posted by L'il J.Seinfeld View Post
Reasons for furlough at UPS.
1. Retirement of 3 man jets. 727s, 747 classics, and DC-8s were parked very quickly and replaced with 767s. Result was need for fewer pilots.
2. Age 60 change. Happened in the middle of reason number 1 above. Result was need for fewer pilots since there were very few mandatory retirements.
3. Over age 60 FEs bid back to the right seats. Result was need for fewer FOs.
4. Worst economic downturn since Great Depression. Result was drop in volume and need for fewer pilots.
5. WorldPort expansion was completed and flights were eliminated in CAE, DFW, PHL, RFD. Result was need for fewer pilots.
6. Scheduling optimization changed. For years UPS staffed the airlines with reserves who rarely flew. Many UPS pilots averaged less than 200 hours a year from 1988 through 2008. This model has changed. UPS will accept an occasional service failure due to lack of pilots since that is far cheaper than keeping excess reserves. Result was need for fewer pilots.
7. Retirement of DC-8 resulted in 150 former DC-8 pilots sitting at home for 18 months with captains making a quarter million and FOs making $150K. This infuriated the bean counters in Atlanta and led to reductions.
8. IPA members elected a president who literally told UPS executives to "f" off. He refused to play the game. The result was UPS being forced to play hardball.

Despite this tsunami of bad news with the worst possible timing, UPS only called for a furlough of 300 and floated the idea of up to 300-500 pilots. 300 pilots got furlough advisements and IPA enacted the open time ban, which increased the requirement for more pilots. UPS halted the furlough at 109 and all but 44 are back.

There is no conspiracy to screw over the pilots. Layoffs of management, hiring freezes, pension contribution freezes were enacted all over the company, and especially outside of the airline. I'm not defending UPS management, but furloughs were inevitable. I am mad about the vacation givebacks and sick leave givebacks along with the reduced guarantee lines nearly all of us did. I think it was 298/300 of the bottom guys took reduced pay. We never should have done that and it was a mistake for the IPA to advise participation. We have learned our lesson though.

I understand why furloughed guys are saying the company is awful. They are basing it on emotion though. UPS doesn't hate you. We are nothing but a number to them--as it should be for any publicaly owned company.

The current open time ban is working. It's obvious. Why we aren't continuing it is beyond me, but we are getting short staffed.
Wow, how many gallons of brown juice have you consumed?? I'm starting to think you don't really fly for us though. For the record 300 pilots did not receive furlough notices it was 179. You have your rosy view and I have mine. Of course some people would call what you have stockholm syndrome.
freightretriever is offline  
Old 05-08-2013, 12:38 PM
  #42  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Twin Wasp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2007
Position: Sr. VP of button pushing
Posts: 2,730
Default

Originally Posted by bozobigtop View Post
I received my first supervisor experience with Evergreen in freight operations in which Evergreen operated some of UPS own aircraft in the Western US. I believe it was Orion Air in which operated UPS own aircraft in the Eastern US. I will never understand why UPS decided to operate the equipment themselves because they have never been happy being the operator.
I don't fly for UPS, but I know several guys that flew for their jet operators before they took it over.

The issue is control. UPS wants absolute control and the only way to get it is to do it themselves.

As I recall there was an FAA issue too in that UPS was in effect in "operational control" of their contractors and the Feds said if you want this level of controll you have to bring the operations in house.
Twin Wasp is offline  
Old 05-08-2013, 01:20 PM
  #43  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: 744 CA
Posts: 4,772
Default

Originally Posted by lolwut View Post
The worst cargo airlines to fly for are any ones that involve YIP.
And you know this how.... do you currently work for one?
HercDriver130 is offline  
Old 05-08-2013, 01:32 PM
  #44  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ockham's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Posts: 110
Default

Originally Posted by lolwut View Post
The worst cargo airlines to fly for are any ones that involve YIP.
The quick and fast answer that get's the award for most accurate in the fewest words.
ockham is offline  
Old 05-08-2013, 01:59 PM
  #45  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: MD-11 F/O
Posts: 232
Default

Originally Posted by L'il J.Seinfeld View Post
Reasons for furlough at UPS.
1. Retirement of 3 man jets. 727s, 747 classics, and DC-8s were parked very quickly and replaced with 767s. Result was need for fewer pilots.
2. Age 60 change. Happened in the middle of reason number 1 above. Result was need for fewer pilots since there were very few mandatory retirements.
3. Over age 60 FEs bid back to the right seats. Result was need for fewer FOs.
4. Worst economic downturn since Great Depression. Result was drop in volume and need for fewer pilots.
5. WorldPort expansion was completed and flights were eliminated in CAE, DFW, PHL, RFD. Result was need for fewer pilots.
6. Scheduling optimization changed. For years UPS staffed the airlines with reserves who rarely flew. Many UPS pilots averaged less than 200 hours a year from 1988 through 2008. This model has changed. UPS will accept an occasional service failure due to lack of pilots since that is far cheaper than keeping excess reserves. Result was need for fewer pilots.
7. Retirement of DC-8 resulted in 150 former DC-8 pilots sitting at home for 18 months with captains making a quarter million and FOs making $150K. This infuriated the bean counters in Atlanta and led to reductions.
8. IPA members elected a president who literally told UPS executives to "f" off. He refused to play the game. The result was UPS being forced to play hardball.

Despite this tsunami of bad news with the worst possible timing, UPS only called for a furlough of 300 and floated the idea of up to 300-500 pilots. 300 pilots got furlough advisements and IPA enacted the open time ban, which increased the requirement for more pilots. UPS halted the furlough at 109 and all but 44 are back.

There is no conspiracy to screw over the pilots. Layoffs of management, hiring freezes, pension contribution freezes were enacted all over the company, and especially outside of the airline. I'm not defending UPS management, but furloughs were inevitable. I am mad about the vacation givebacks and sick leave givebacks along with the reduced guarantee lines nearly all of us did. I think it was 298/300 of the bottom guys took reduced pay. We never should have done that and it was a mistake for the IPA to advise participation. We have learned our lesson though.

I understand why furloughed guys are saying the company is awful. They are basing it on emotion though. UPS doesn't hate you. We are nothing but a number to them--as it should be for any publicaly owned company.

The current open time ban is working. It's obvious. Why we aren't continuing it is beyond me, but we are getting short staffed.
There was more justification for a furlough 2 years before they actually did it. Once they decided to pull the trigger... It was a mistake. We had a program to work with the company to avert a furlough. They decided to steam roll over us, and it just shows that they (mistakenly) give zero economic value to happy employees. Beyond that, they way they executed the furlough put undue stress on many families. They couldn't make a plan or stick to one. They refuse to tell anyone the one year plan... People's lives are in the balance... Why not share a little information so people can make critical decisions in their lives. We understand that things change, but their approach is to give no information (or misinformation). What a shame. It doesn't have to be like this... But it is.

I wouldn't put this as one of the worst places to work. I generally like it. There are a lot of bad jobs out there.... But there are many good ones too. Some post here that they have no sympathy for a UPS pilot... But many here have had their lives turned upside down. I feel bad for any pilot at any airline who is being tormented by their company!

We need to all stick together...
cessnapilot is offline  
Old 05-08-2013, 02:55 PM
  #46  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Position: Left seat of a Jet
Posts: 514
Default

Originally Posted by Twin Wasp View Post
As I recall there was an FAA issue too in that UPS was in effect in "operational control" of their contractors and the Feds said if you want this level of controll you have to bring the operations in house.
I understand the operational control issue because I have seen it at some of the FedEx feeders and FedEx's Feeder Aircraft Operations (FAO). I have not meet one FAA person who can explain to my satisfaction about how this operation works with a straight face. FedEx owns everything and leases the equipment back to the individual operators whereas the companies hire their own employees and pay the wages/benefits. If this is the case I am wondering how come you can't do the same with a Boeing jet or you're attempting to BS me. I can go visit two FAA offices across the street from each other and get two completely different answers.
bozobigtop is offline  
Old 05-08-2013, 03:50 PM
  #47  
Gets Weekends Off
 
L'il J.Seinfeld's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Brown
Posts: 1,126
Default

Originally Posted by FrontSeat View Post
He does fly for UPS. Just be glad he is not on the IPA negotiating committee.
I'm expecting improvements in all areas but especially scheduling. I love my job and benefit greatly from the contract. However, UPS is making money in the billions from the airline. We are a cash cow and should be compensated as such.
L'il J.Seinfeld is offline  
Old 05-08-2013, 03:51 PM
  #48  
Gets Weekends Off
 
L'il J.Seinfeld's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Brown
Posts: 1,126
Default

Originally Posted by freightretriever View Post
Wow, how many gallons of brown juice have you consumed?? I'm starting to think you don't really fly for us though. For the record 300 pilots did not receive furlough notices it was 179. You have your rosy view and I have mine. Of course some people would call what you have stockholm syndrome.
My mistake. 300 were put on notice. I'm just stating facts. Which one of my reasons above do you disagree?
L'il J.Seinfeld is offline  
Old 05-08-2013, 04:19 PM
  #49  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: On Food Stamps
Posts: 937
Default

Originally Posted by L'il J.Seinfeld View Post
UPS is making money in the billions from the airline.
Again you have no idea what your talking about.

Last edited by Shaggy1970; 05-08-2013 at 04:59 PM.
Shaggy1970 is offline  
Old 05-08-2013, 05:05 PM
  #50  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Natca's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Posts: 579
Default

Originally Posted by lolwut View Post
The worst cargo airlines to fly for are any ones that involve YIP.
Yip is better then a rj ...it's a mid level place to be.... The place to avoid is pts and royal air and ameristar..... Kalitta is a ok place to be if your biding time for something better. Even worse is Toledo express operations
Natca is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FEtrip7
Cargo
38
02-16-2012 02:25 PM
RockyTopFlyer
Cargo
6
11-24-2011 02:53 PM
woodfinx
Hangar Talk
0
07-31-2009 06:12 AM
StripAlert
Mergers and Acquisitions
354
07-07-2008 08:05 PM
WatchThis!
Major
0
07-10-2005 03:55 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices