FDX: PiBS, Pros and Non-Senority List
#1
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 1559
Posts: 1,533
FDX: PiBS, Pros and Non-Senority List
The company seems to be getting smart. They are attacking at the edges, the instructors and Section 9. Get qualified, non-seniority holders into those jobs and we have the same problem UPS has with their non-seniority FQS types. I hope we hold the line on this....
#2
Here's my question (and obvious lack of negotiating knowledge), when the company insists on PBS in ANY area of our contract, why do we not just stand up from the table and walk away? Why even bother discussing its "creep" into other sections of the contract? Everyone I know, from DL, to AA, to any other airline that utilizes PBS says it is the worst thing that can happen to our quality of life. So why beat about the bush on this, thinking that somewhere down the road the company will say, "...ah, just kidding about this whole PBS thing.....just wondering how long you guys would put up with it for"? We are wasting time in other valuable areas!! This is a SHOW STOPPER!! The longer we take to dance around this issue, the longer the company can delay getting us a REAL contract, and we suffer financially. ENOUGH PBS TALK........WALK!!!!!!
#3
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Here's my question (and obvious lack of negotiating knowledge), when the company insists on PBS in ANY area of our contract, why do we not just stand up from the table and walk away? Why even bother discussing its "creep" into other sections of the contract? Everyone I know, from DL, to AA, to any other airline that utilizes PBS says it is the worst thing that can happen to our quality of life. So why beat about the bush on this, thinking that somewhere down the road the company will say, "...ah, just kidding about this whole PBS thing.....just wondering how long you guys would put up with it for"? We are wasting time in other valuable areas!! This is a SHOW STOPPER!! The longer we take to dance around this issue, the longer the company can delay getting us a REAL contract, and we suffer financially. ENOUGH PBS TALK........WALK!!!!!!
Because when we enter self help the company enters self help and can impose whatever they like on us. If we are the ones walking away from the table the negotiator just shrugs his shoulders and say why didn't you talk to them.
#4
Line Holder
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Posts: 31
Here's my question (and obvious lack of negotiating knowledge), when the company insists on PBS in ANY area of our contract, why do we not just stand up from the table and walk away? Why even bother discussing its "creep" into other sections of the contract? Everyone I know, from DL, to AA, to any other airline that utilizes PBS says it is the worst thing that can happen to our quality of life. So why beat about the bush on this, thinking that somewhere down the road the company will say, "...ah, just kidding about this whole PBS thing.....just wondering how long you guys would put up with it for"? We are wasting time in other valuable areas!! This is a SHOW STOPPER!! The longer we take to dance around this issue, the longer the company can delay getting us a REAL contract, and we suffer financially. ENOUGH PBS TALK........WALK!!!!!!
On a side note, I know that a lot of guys on reserve have been denied schedule improvements due to "insufficient reserves." In my opinion, and again, it's not worth anything, this could be a ploy by the company for PBS. Don't be surprised if a couple of months down the road they come in and say "well with PBS you wouldn't have to make bid line adjustments because PBS will give you what you want." So not true! Don't believe it, speaking from experience here, that is not a true statement!
Hold the line. PBS = Automatic NO VOTE! By the way, everyone talks about the importance of wearing ALPA lanyards to show unity of the pilot group. Why doesn't the association make anti-PBS pins to attach to those lanyards to show how serious we are about this issue. Just a suggestion but, yet again, my opinion doesn't count.
#5
To be more correct, they can impose their last offer before the 30 day cooling off period started. You are correct in that protocol requires good faith negotiation until the NMB declares an impasse.
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
My question is what constitutes French Struck Work? Anxiously waiting the company MEC negotiated FCIF per CBA 1.F.
#7
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
#8
Outside of the current CBA???
If we are adamant enough in our refusal to play ball with PBS, why not let the company know right off the bat that there is no need to continue until PBS is gone. They can pitch whatever they want, in whatever format but what it boils down to is a "NO" vote if PBS comes into play. So again I ask, why do we keep spinning our wheels? This could drag on for awhile.......
#9
Outside of the current CBA???
If we are adamant enough in our refusal to play ball with PBS, why not let the company know right off the bat that there is no need to continue until PBS is gone. They can pitch whatever they want, in whatever format but what it boils down to is a "NO" vote if PBS comes into play. So again I ask, why do we keep spinning our wheels? This could drag on for awhile.......
If we are adamant enough in our refusal to play ball with PBS, why not let the company know right off the bat that there is no need to continue until PBS is gone. They can pitch whatever they want, in whatever format but what it boils down to is a "NO" vote if PBS comes into play. So again I ask, why do we keep spinning our wheels? This could drag on for awhile.......
#10
Outside of the current CBA???
If we are adamant enough in our refusal to play ball with PBS, why not let the company know right off the bat that there is no need to continue until PBS is gone. They can pitch whatever they want, in whatever format but what it boils down to is a "NO" vote if PBS comes into play. So again I ask, why do we keep spinning our wheels? This could drag on for awhile.......
If we are adamant enough in our refusal to play ball with PBS, why not let the company know right off the bat that there is no need to continue until PBS is gone. They can pitch whatever they want, in whatever format but what it boils down to is a "NO" vote if PBS comes into play. So again I ask, why do we keep spinning our wheels? This could drag on for awhile.......