Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FDX: PiBS, Pros and Non-Senority List >

FDX: PiBS, Pros and Non-Senority List

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX: PiBS, Pros and Non-Senority List

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-28-2013, 08:08 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: 1559
Posts: 1,533
Default FDX: PiBS, Pros and Non-Senority List

The company seems to be getting smart. They are attacking at the edges, the instructors and Section 9. Get qualified, non-seniority holders into those jobs and we have the same problem UPS has with their non-seniority FQS types. I hope we hold the line on this....
MX727 is offline  
Old 05-29-2013, 04:50 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
flextodaline's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: moving target
Posts: 385
Default

Here's my question (and obvious lack of negotiating knowledge), when the company insists on PBS in ANY area of our contract, why do we not just stand up from the table and walk away? Why even bother discussing its "creep" into other sections of the contract? Everyone I know, from DL, to AA, to any other airline that utilizes PBS says it is the worst thing that can happen to our quality of life. So why beat about the bush on this, thinking that somewhere down the road the company will say, "...ah, just kidding about this whole PBS thing.....just wondering how long you guys would put up with it for"? We are wasting time in other valuable areas!! This is a SHOW STOPPER!! The longer we take to dance around this issue, the longer the company can delay getting us a REAL contract, and we suffer financially. ENOUGH PBS TALK........WALK!!!!!!
flextodaline is offline  
Old 05-29-2013, 05:09 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by flextodaline View Post
Here's my question (and obvious lack of negotiating knowledge), when the company insists on PBS in ANY area of our contract, why do we not just stand up from the table and walk away? Why even bother discussing its "creep" into other sections of the contract? Everyone I know, from DL, to AA, to any other airline that utilizes PBS says it is the worst thing that can happen to our quality of life. So why beat about the bush on this, thinking that somewhere down the road the company will say, "...ah, just kidding about this whole PBS thing.....just wondering how long you guys would put up with it for"? We are wasting time in other valuable areas!! This is a SHOW STOPPER!! The longer we take to dance around this issue, the longer the company can delay getting us a REAL contract, and we suffer financially. ENOUGH PBS TALK........WALK!!!!!!
Short version:
Because when we enter self help the company enters self help and can impose whatever they like on us. If we are the ones walking away from the table the negotiator just shrugs his shoulders and say why didn't you talk to them.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 05-29-2013, 05:12 AM
  #4  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Mar 2013
Posts: 31
Default

Originally Posted by flextodaline View Post
Here's my question (and obvious lack of negotiating knowledge), when the company insists on PBS in ANY area of our contract, why do we not just stand up from the table and walk away? Why even bother discussing its "creep" into other sections of the contract? Everyone I know, from DL, to AA, to any other airline that utilizes PBS says it is the worst thing that can happen to our quality of life. So why beat about the bush on this, thinking that somewhere down the road the company will say, "...ah, just kidding about this whole PBS thing.....just wondering how long you guys would put up with it for"? We are wasting time in other valuable areas!! This is a SHOW STOPPER!! The longer we take to dance around this issue, the longer the company can delay getting us a REAL contract, and we suffer financially. ENOUGH PBS TALK........WALK!!!!!!
DING, DING, DING, DING . . . . . We have a winner! I have been wondering the same thing. Why let the company inside your playbook when what they are offering is so unacceptable to the majority of the crew force it would be voted down every day and twice on Sunday. In my opinion, and it's not worth anything, the NC should have walked as soon as PBS was mentioned and not withdrawn.

On a side note, I know that a lot of guys on reserve have been denied schedule improvements due to "insufficient reserves." In my opinion, and again, it's not worth anything, this could be a ploy by the company for PBS. Don't be surprised if a couple of months down the road they come in and say "well with PBS you wouldn't have to make bid line adjustments because PBS will give you what you want." So not true! Don't believe it, speaking from experience here, that is not a true statement!

Hold the line. PBS = Automatic NO VOTE! By the way, everyone talks about the importance of wearing ALPA lanyards to show unity of the pilot group. Why doesn't the association make anti-PBS pins to attach to those lanyards to show how serious we are about this issue. Just a suggestion but, yet again, my opinion doesn't count.
Mister Nobody is offline  
Old 05-29-2013, 05:59 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RedeyeAV8r's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,838
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG View Post
Short version:
Because when we enter self help the company enters self help and can impose whatever they like on us. If we are the ones walking away from the table the negotiator just shrugs his shoulders and say why didn't you talk to them.
To be more correct, they can impose their last offer before the 30 day cooling off period started. You are correct in that protocol requires good faith negotiation until the NMB declares an impasse.
RedeyeAV8r is offline  
Old 05-29-2013, 06:06 AM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by RedeyeAV8r View Post
To be more correct, they can impose their last offer before the 30 day cooling off period started. You are correct in that protocol requires good faith negotiation until the NMB declares an impasse.
My question is what constitutes French Struck Work? Anxiously waiting the company MEC negotiated FCIF per CBA 1.F.
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 05-29-2013, 06:09 AM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG View Post
Short version:
Because when we enter self help the company enters self help and can impose whatever they like on us...
Wouldn't make any difference if there's no one there to impose it on.

Just sayin'
Busboy is offline  
Old 05-29-2013, 08:21 AM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
flextodaline's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: moving target
Posts: 385
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG View Post
Short version:
Because when we enter self help the company enters self help and can impose whatever they like on us. If we are the ones walking away from the table the negotiator just shrugs his shoulders and say why didn't you talk to them.

Outside of the current CBA???

If we are adamant enough in our refusal to play ball with PBS, why not let the company know right off the bat that there is no need to continue until PBS is gone. They can pitch whatever they want, in whatever format but what it boils down to is a "NO" vote if PBS comes into play. So again I ask, why do we keep spinning our wheels? This could drag on for awhile.......
flextodaline is offline  
Old 05-29-2013, 09:31 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
trashhauler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: B-777
Posts: 455
Default

Originally Posted by flextodaline View Post
Outside of the current CBA???

If we are adamant enough in our refusal to play ball with PBS, why not let the company know right off the bat that there is no need to continue until PBS is gone. They can pitch whatever they want, in whatever format but what it boils down to is a "NO" vote if PBS comes into play. So again I ask, why do we keep spinning our wheels? This could drag on for awhile.......
Flex, the company already know PIBS is a non starter. But, they are still going to go through their paces and present it. The thing you need to remember is that this is business,it's not personal. At least, this is the way I look at it.
trashhauler is offline  
Old 05-29-2013, 10:15 AM
  #10  
Ok, No more sleeping Dog
 
FLMD11CAPT's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: MD-11, F/O
Posts: 889
Default

Originally Posted by flextodaline View Post
Outside of the current CBA???

If we are adamant enough in our refusal to play ball with PBS, why not let the company know right off the bat that there is no need to continue until PBS is gone. They can pitch whatever they want, in whatever format but what it boils down to is a "NO" vote if PBS comes into play. So again I ask, why do we keep spinning our wheels? This could drag on for awhile.......
Because the rules of the game are the Neg. Comm. has to sit and listen to "Their" side. it's called bargaining in good faith. At any future immpasse we have to be able to point to our barganing history and say "We listened and worked for a solution but....". The only way to hold the line on PBS is exactly what we are doing.....THE MEMBERSHIP is sending and has to continue to send the unequivocal message "We Will NOT Ratify ANY agreement that contains PBS, Period". Then during these current negotiations the NC can shrug and say "Hey we can talk till the cows come home about PBS....It won't ratify". Thus making it ( from us) a dead issue.
FLMD11CAPT is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices