Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FDX- Council 7 Message 10/6/14 >

FDX- Council 7 Message 10/6/14

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX- Council 7 Message 10/6/14

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-10-2014, 05:38 AM
  #131  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: Bus driver
Posts: 322
Default

I guarantee you it will keep rearing its ugly head. FedEx isn't an insurance company, they want out of the pension business. It's a reality. The rest of american industry has done, doing, the same thing. We have to be smart and figure out how to transition to a replacement vehicle, not summarily executing our negtiatiors. The best we can do is delay the inevitable. How about contractualy agreeing to nonbinding exploration of this extremely complex issue during the course of the next contract. I don't have the answer, it's just a thought.
Full pull is offline  
Old 10-10-2014, 05:50 AM
  #132  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Default

Originally Posted by Full pull View Post
I guarantee you it will keep rearing its ugly head. FedEx isn't an insurance company, they want out of the pension business. It's a reality. The rest of american industry has done, doing, the same thing. We have to be smart and figure out how to transition to a replacement vehicle, not summarily executing our negtiatiors. The best we can do is delay the inevitable. How about contractualy agreeing to nonbinding exploration of this extremely complex issue during the course of the next contract. I don't have the answer, it's just a thought.
What are you, French?

When it gets to the point that all these corporation's management teams lose their pensions, ours included...Then, maybe I'll start thinking about a transition to another retirement plan.
Busboy is offline  
Old 10-10-2014, 06:02 AM
  #133  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: Bus driver
Posts: 322
Default

That's what I like about this forum, no intelligent discussion, just insults. Like I said in my post, I don't have the answer, but I welcome any ideas.
Full pull is offline  
Old 10-10-2014, 06:06 AM
  #134  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Default

Originally Posted by Full pull View Post
That's what I like about this forum, no intelligent discussion, just insults.
You're right...I apologize to the French.
Busboy is offline  
Old 10-10-2014, 06:22 AM
  #135  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

Originally Posted by MaxKts View Post
The fact that we discussed it vice summarily dismissing it means it will keep rearing its ugly head from the company side just like PIBS!
Didn't we summarily dismiss PIBS and it keeps rearing it's ugly head anyways? So in fact discussing it did no harm?
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 10-10-2014, 06:29 AM
  #136  
Out to pasture...
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B777 Capt
Posts: 98
Default

Once you buy into the notion that we may have to make concessions, whether in retirement, work rules, pay, or whatever, the company is half-way there. Nothing is inevitable. I've heard this "train is leaving the station, we better jump on" way too much. Just because other companies are ditching their pension plans doesn't mean we need to dump ours. I believe most companies are doing this just because they can and "everybody else" is doing it, not because they truly have to in order to survive. Sure, the company would save money by trashing our pensions, but at what cost to us? At a time when the company is making money hand over fist, there is no reason in the world why we should even entertain the derogation of our pensions. If they want to propose a new way to figure it or a new form altogether, fine. Just as long as each individual pilot has a choice whether to accept the change or keep what he has.
av8rdude is offline  
Old 10-10-2014, 08:38 AM
  #137  
"blue collar thug"!
 
iarapilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: A proponent of...
Posts: 1,614
Default

Originally Posted by av8rdude View Post
Once you buy into the notion that we may have to make concessions, whether in retirement, work rules, pay, or whatever, the company is half-way there. Nothing is inevitable. I've heard this "train is leaving the station, we better jump on" way too much. Just because other companies are ditching their pension plans doesn't mean we need to dump ours. I believe most companies are doing this just because they can and "everybody else" is doing it, not because they truly have to in order to survive. Sure, the company would save money by trashing our pensions, but at what cost to us? At a time when the company is making money hand over fist, there is no reason in the world why we should even entertain the derogation of our pensions. If they want to propose a new way to figure it or a new form altogether, fine. Just as long as each individual pilot has a choice whether to accept the change or keep what he has.
A big 10-4 on that. So many people on here have a mentality that wreaks of conditioning and brainwashing. There is no reason to give up anything as mentioned by other posters; unless of course we strike and lose it after that. It is time for some to man up and quit acting like a slave. Geez. I am appalled by the lack of nads that so many of our pilots have.....or havent.
iarapilot is offline  
Old 10-10-2014, 10:10 AM
  #138  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 575
Default

most large corporations that shed their retirement plans had the whole work force on them. We are only approx 4200 pilots plus maybe another 700 that have retired out of over 130k employees. So when you speak of other corporations getting rid of their pensions you cannot compare us with them. Totally different numbers.

As for the freeze pension/B fund folks, how did your retirement funds fair the last few days? The A fund did not change at all. Just saying we are all not Warren Buffett!
max8222 is offline  
Old 10-10-2014, 11:06 AM
  #139  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: 757 Capt
Posts: 798
Default

Originally Posted by av8rdude View Post
Some version of A-plan freeze and B-plan increase, switch to a cash balance plan, or some such, MIGHT be ok if each INDIVIDUAL pilot had a choice whether to accept a proposed change or keep his plan as is. I would definitely oppose any plan change that was imposed across the board. We should not even discuss any sort of B-scale anything. That's a slippery road we don't want to go down.

That's what we need -- two different voting blocs on every contract after this one. That'll help us create unity. (sarcasm intended)

Pipe
pipe is offline  
Old 10-10-2014, 11:08 AM
  #140  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: 757 Capt
Posts: 798
Default

Originally Posted by Malter1 View Post
This place went from the premiere place to work to the one of the worst inside of 3 years. I would steer anyone I call a friend away from here. Mismanagement on an epic scale. The climate is toxic. It's beyond standard negotiation crunch time BS. I would leave in a heartbeat if I had under 5 years here.
+1...........................
pipe is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SoCalGuy
United
41
09-26-2012 06:53 PM
FreightDawgyDog
Cargo
0
10-25-2011 01:54 PM
DornierPilot
Cargo
27
01-08-2009 06:13 AM
USMCFDX
Cargo
23
11-17-2008 11:06 AM
Laxrox43
Cargo
77
06-05-2008 08:28 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices