FDX- Council 7 Message 10/6/14
#131
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: Bus driver
Posts: 322
I guarantee you it will keep rearing its ugly head. FedEx isn't an insurance company, they want out of the pension business. It's a reality. The rest of american industry has done, doing, the same thing. We have to be smart and figure out how to transition to a replacement vehicle, not summarily executing our negtiatiors. The best we can do is delay the inevitable. How about contractualy agreeing to nonbinding exploration of this extremely complex issue during the course of the next contract. I don't have the answer, it's just a thought.
#132
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
I guarantee you it will keep rearing its ugly head. FedEx isn't an insurance company, they want out of the pension business. It's a reality. The rest of american industry has done, doing, the same thing. We have to be smart and figure out how to transition to a replacement vehicle, not summarily executing our negtiatiors. The best we can do is delay the inevitable. How about contractualy agreeing to nonbinding exploration of this extremely complex issue during the course of the next contract. I don't have the answer, it's just a thought.
When it gets to the point that all these corporation's management teams lose their pensions, ours included...Then, maybe I'll start thinking about a transition to another retirement plan.
#135
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
#136
Out to pasture...
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: B777 Capt
Posts: 98
Once you buy into the notion that we may have to make concessions, whether in retirement, work rules, pay, or whatever, the company is half-way there. Nothing is inevitable. I've heard this "train is leaving the station, we better jump on" way too much. Just because other companies are ditching their pension plans doesn't mean we need to dump ours. I believe most companies are doing this just because they can and "everybody else" is doing it, not because they truly have to in order to survive. Sure, the company would save money by trashing our pensions, but at what cost to us? At a time when the company is making money hand over fist, there is no reason in the world why we should even entertain the derogation of our pensions. If they want to propose a new way to figure it or a new form altogether, fine. Just as long as each individual pilot has a choice whether to accept the change or keep what he has.
#137
Once you buy into the notion that we may have to make concessions, whether in retirement, work rules, pay, or whatever, the company is half-way there. Nothing is inevitable. I've heard this "train is leaving the station, we better jump on" way too much. Just because other companies are ditching their pension plans doesn't mean we need to dump ours. I believe most companies are doing this just because they can and "everybody else" is doing it, not because they truly have to in order to survive. Sure, the company would save money by trashing our pensions, but at what cost to us? At a time when the company is making money hand over fist, there is no reason in the world why we should even entertain the derogation of our pensions. If they want to propose a new way to figure it or a new form altogether, fine. Just as long as each individual pilot has a choice whether to accept the change or keep what he has.
#138
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Posts: 575
most large corporations that shed their retirement plans had the whole work force on them. We are only approx 4200 pilots plus maybe another 700 that have retired out of over 130k employees. So when you speak of other corporations getting rid of their pensions you cannot compare us with them. Totally different numbers.
As for the freeze pension/B fund folks, how did your retirement funds fair the last few days? The A fund did not change at all. Just saying we are all not Warren Buffett!
As for the freeze pension/B fund folks, how did your retirement funds fair the last few days? The A fund did not change at all. Just saying we are all not Warren Buffett!
#139
Banned
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: 757 Capt
Posts: 798
Some version of A-plan freeze and B-plan increase, switch to a cash balance plan, or some such, MIGHT be ok if each INDIVIDUAL pilot had a choice whether to accept a proposed change or keep his plan as is. I would definitely oppose any plan change that was imposed across the board. We should not even discuss any sort of B-scale anything. That's a slippery road we don't want to go down.
That's what we need -- two different voting blocs on every contract after this one. That'll help us create unity. (sarcasm intended)
Pipe
#140
Banned
Joined APC: Mar 2009
Position: 757 Capt
Posts: 798
This place went from the premiere place to work to the one of the worst inside of 3 years. I would steer anyone I call a friend away from here. Mismanagement on an epic scale. The climate is toxic. It's beyond standard negotiation crunch time BS. I would leave in a heartbeat if I had under 5 years here.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post