FDX - 757 Disputed Pairings - Nov '14
10-31-2014, 11:47 PM
#31
Line Holder
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: Maddog baby!
Posts: 79
Originally Posted by DLax85
Very disappointing
It's a mix of senior & junior Capts
With at least one known DP recidivist
Capts need to be talking to Capts
Communicate & Educate!
It's a mix of senior & junior Capts
With at least one known DP recidivist
Capts need to be talking to Capts
Communicate & Educate!
11-01-2014, 05:09 AM
#32
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: 11 Left Side
Posts: 100
It's a shame the we can't call the people who are doing the wrong thing exactly what they are. Because it's true, they are they same selfish individuals who would then cry workplace violence lol...and this isn't the time to give anyone an excuse to take hostages.
If I were a captain again though, I'd be exercising my prerogative on any of them getting on my Jumpseat, that wouldn't be threatening or intimidating. Wouldn't it be perfectly legal? Just a thought.
If I were a captain again though, I'd be exercising my prerogative on any of them getting on my Jumpseat, that wouldn't be threatening or intimidating. Wouldn't it be perfectly legal? Just a thought.
11-01-2014, 10:51 AM
#33
Organizational Learning
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Originally Posted by skypig
If I were a captain again though, I'd be exercising my prerogative on any of them getting on my Jumpseat, that wouldn't be threatening or intimidating. Wouldn't it be perfectly legal? Just a thought.
Cabin jumpseat - a little trickier. You have to be able to answer questions ... very carefully.
.
11-11-2014, 09:24 AM
#34
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Gear Monkey
Posts: 3,191
Originally Posted by DLax85
It's been a while, but unfortunately Disputed Pairings are back in the 757 MEM Bidpack as we enter Peak.
Please put Safety First, and support your PSIT & SIG:
Straight from the SIG Notes:
#103 / 10NOV
#105 / 17NOV
#120 / 10, 17 NOV
#124 / 24NOV
#302 / 04, 05, 06, 11, 12, 13, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26 NOV
#346 / 10, 17 NOV
BFM-QRO, pairing 302, is a previously disputed pairing that has reappeared in November. We are continuing to dispute this pairing design based on risks associated with operating two legs critical into a high CFIT/minimal ATC international
destination.
TV-SYR-EWR-FLL, disputed pairings 103/105/120/124/346 contain an 11+01 layover before an 11+18 3 leg night duty period
Thanks,
In Safety...and Unity,
DLax
Please put Safety First, and support your PSIT & SIG:
Straight from the SIG Notes:
#103 / 10NOV
#105 / 17NOV
#120 / 10, 17 NOV
#124 / 24NOV
#302 / 04, 05, 06, 11, 12, 13, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26 NOV
#346 / 10, 17 NOV
BFM-QRO, pairing 302, is a previously disputed pairing that has reappeared in November. We are continuing to dispute this pairing design based on risks associated with operating two legs critical into a high CFIT/minimal ATC international
destination.
TV-SYR-EWR-FLL, disputed pairings 103/105/120/124/346 contain an 11+01 layover before an 11+18 3 leg night duty period
Thanks,
In Safety...and Unity,
DLax
Let's not lose focus on Safety
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
