BidX and December 2014 HKG
#1
Line Holder
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Mar 2008
Posts: 83
BidX and December 2014 HKG
Ok, so the header part of the file in the company’s bid pack was slightly wrong, and that confused BidX and BidX Mobile. I’ve fixed it and solutions for both BidX Pro and BidX Mobile can be found at the FAQ page of my website.
FAQ
Cheers
FAQ
Cheers
#2
Glad you were able to fixit quickly
Any chance BidX mobile could have an option to show standbys in excess of the norm. Would like the opportunity to see the rare hotel Stby pairing without being inundated by the airport stbys
Any chance BidX mobile could have an option to show standbys in excess of the norm. Would like the opportunity to see the rare hotel Stby pairing without being inundated by the airport stbys
#4
The amount of Memphis hotel stby pairings built into the December bidpack is disconcerting. Plus side is I think they should be trip guarantee pairings and thus one can drop them, shoot, one would think they'd have to be since they're built into the bidpack.
Sucks that they're there, but I'd rather do a week of Memphis than a week of some of the max landing pairings the company built. Some of which built right up to the max scheduled day contractual limits....any bets on whether things will go as scheduled?
Mgt certainly 'optimizing' the schedule as much as they can to get through December. Just think, This December pairing construction monstrosity is as close to PBS as the company can get. Now imagine 'bidding' on these pairings with the harsh realization that even the number 1 guy in the seat won't necessarily get his requests if it is more efficient for the company to give 'his' pairings to someone Junior
Sucks that they're there, but I'd rather do a week of Memphis than a week of some of the max landing pairings the company built. Some of which built right up to the max scheduled day contractual limits....any bets on whether things will go as scheduled?
Mgt certainly 'optimizing' the schedule as much as they can to get through December. Just think, This December pairing construction monstrosity is as close to PBS as the company can get. Now imagine 'bidding' on these pairings with the harsh realization that even the number 1 guy in the seat won't necessarily get his requests if it is more efficient for the company to give 'his' pairings to someone Junior