FDX- MEM 757 Disputed Pairings - Dec 14
View/Add Opens Wed
If you must adjust your schedule in Dec, please do it safely! Straight from the SIG Notes: Disputed Pairing Process: Pairings specific to peak were the focus of our discussion. High block and high duty trips operating through the critical period were analyzed. The difficulty of these trips may be amplified if there are significant delays during our peak season. The SIG was able to fix some of these pairings, but a few remain disputed. #304 - 8 Dec #305 - 15 Dec #476 - 3 Dec #480 - 16 Dec #874 - 2,3,4,9,10,11,16,17,18, 23 Dec Please support your SIG! Safety thru Unity, VR, DLax |
For those asking why....
BFM-QRO, pairing 874, is a previously disputed pairing. We are continuing to dispute this pairing design based on risks associated with operating two legs critical into a high CFIT/minimal ATC international destination. BTV-SYR-EWR-DTW, pairings 304/305, has layovers as short as 10+35 before operating night duty periods as long as 10+52. We are disputing this pairing design due to cumulative fatigue concerns. Pairings 476/480 are disputed for limited rest opportunities prior to night duty periods as long as 11+27. ...Please support your hardworking SIG |
Get it via Text Msg
Good time (& place) to remind folks to signup for the union's Texting/Email Service. Currently there are only 177 MEM757 folks signed up to received Disputed Pairs info :(. Spread the word! Do it yourself and ask everyone on the crew bus if they are signed up.
You can sign up for bidding reminders, disputed pairs info and more. Go to the union home page and look for the big green "C" button to signup. |
View/Add complete
Nicely done in both seats --- very nice! Let's focus on Safety and support the SIG all month. Communicate & Educate. In Unity, DLax |
Originally Posted by DLax85
(Post 1766380)
For those asking why....
BFM-QRO, pairing 874, is a previously disputed pairing. We are continuing to dispute this pairing design based on risks associated with operating two legs critical into a high CFIT/minimal ATC international destination. BTV-SYR-EWR-DTW, pairings 304/305, has layovers as short as 10+35 before operating night duty periods as long as 10+52. We are disputing this pairing design due to cumulative fatigue concerns. Pairings 476/480 are disputed for limited rest opportunities prior to night duty periods as long as 11+27. ...Please support your hardworking SIG If they continue that pairing as it is during the low fall/winter WX, something bad is likely to happen. Pipe |
QRO - is that Mexico City?
|
Originally Posted by Bill Kilgore
(Post 1769750)
QRO - is that Mexico City?
|
Originally Posted by pipe
(Post 1769716)
Did QRO on reserve last week. Worst experience in 20yrs of airline flying. Flight safety, ASAP, fatigue, and POR complete.
If they continue that pairing as it is during the low fall/winter WX, something bad is likely to happen. Pipe Thx for taking the time to do the right thing and file all those reports --- especially the ASAP The FAA ASAP rep will get to read that one --- hopefully by multiple reserve pilots --- and ask the company why they're continuing to ignore their own pilots safety concerns ??? True safety programs are proactive, not reactive Let's not allow these type of pairings to become part of our normal bidpack Fly Professionally - Fly Safely - Fly Well Rested! |
Secondary Lines complete in both seats
100% focus on safety Very nice....very, very nice! Let's keep focused all month |
Originally Posted by DLax85
(Post 1771633)
Secondary Lines complete in both seats
100% focus on safety Very nice....very, very nice! Let's keep focused all month |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:26 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands