Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FDX Pilots - Disciplined, Fined, or Expelled >

FDX Pilots - Disciplined, Fined, or Expelled

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FDX Pilots - Disciplined, Fined, or Expelled

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-29-2015, 02:00 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2006
Posts: 398
Default

Originally Posted by FamilyATM View Post
I fault the MEC leadership for not getting out in front of this and keeping the membership informed.
Not getting out in front? Hmm. Hard to do when you're the one behind it.
Fedex999999 is offline  
Old 01-29-2015, 02:56 PM
  #12  
Line Holder
 
Bill Kilgore's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2012
Position: Huey Gunship
Posts: 64
Default

Must admit I'm tired of having to read APC to find out what's happening in our union instead of hearing directly from ALPA.
Bill Kilgore is offline  
Old 01-29-2015, 07:28 PM
  #13  
Organizational Learning 
Thread Starter
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

Originally Posted by trashhauler View Post

... why would the block 11 guy go through the trouble ... to charge these guys, if he didn't have a very good reason.

... I suspect the MEC guys being charged with article 8 must have done something to be charged.

You're right, they did something. They took their jobs seriously and honored their obligation to serve ALL FedEx pilots above themselves, and, acting according to the FDX ALPA MEC Policy Manual, they removed a Committee Chairman from his appointed job. We discussed this event in an earlier thread this past November (beginning here: http://www.airlinepilotforums.com/ca...ml#post1756595 ). I took care Wednesday morning to not mention his name when I posed my questions to Howie, but Howie was all too quick to mention Eissler's name in his brief response.


I do find it rather odd that he only charged 5 of the MEC members who voted for his removal, and not the other 4.






.
TonyC is offline  
Old 01-29-2015, 07:35 PM
  #14  
Beaches and Sand
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Chasing Surf
Posts: 368
Default

Well said TonyC. As Usual.
kc10/c130 is offline  
Old 01-29-2015, 08:47 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
42GO's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: MD-11 Capt
Posts: 330
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Kilgore View Post
Must admit I'm tired of having to read APC to find out what's happening in our union instead of hearing directly from ALPA.
You are SURPRISED BY THIS.....reallly????????
42GO is offline  
Old 01-30-2015, 04:10 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
trashhauler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: B-777
Posts: 455
Default

"They took their jobs seriously and honored their obligation to serve ALL FedEx pilots above themselves, and, acting according to the FDX ALPA MEC Policy Manual, they removed a Committee Chairman from his appointed job."

So Tony, you are saying these guys are being charged with Article 8 for doing what you said above? I find that hard to believe. I heard about the FE firing and reason for it, but how do theses guys get charged with article 8 for doing that? There has to be more to the story that you either don't know or are not telling.
trashhauler is offline  
Old 01-30-2015, 08:22 AM
  #17  
Organizational Learning 
Thread Starter
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

Originally Posted by trashhauler View Post

There has to be more to the story that you either don't know or are not telling.

Sure, there must be a good reason for Howie preferring Article VIII charges, and there must be something I'm not telling. I'm obviously trying to cover up the wrong-doing of the charged members.

Then why is Howie the one refusing to answer simple, direct questions? I asked him to tell us what the charges are -- in public, in front of 50 or so dues-paying members in good standing. Nothing. Wouldn't talk. Lawyered up. He won't tell us what his motivation is. He won't tell us what he thinks those people did wrong. He won't tell us what remedy -- discipline, fine, or expulsion -- he seeks. HE'S the one that needs to be answering questions, not me.


I will not be baited into attepting to divine the motivations of the former Legislative Affairs Committee Chairman, or to guess what he's trying to accomplish. After all, I don't want to be brought up on Article VIII charges for hurting someone's feelings.

It appears that he is unhappy that he was removed from his appointment, and that he believes that he was unfairly punished. (By the way, removing an appointee is not punishment.) It is obvious this is entirely politically motivated -- pure vindictiveness.

And it is obviously done with total disregard for the pilots of FedEx who deserve to be served by a well-functioning MEC. In this case, the pride and ego of a single individual is more important.



But it must be me not telling part of the story ...






.
TonyC is offline  
Old 01-30-2015, 08:41 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 397
Default

I'm guessing 7,9,&10....
FDX28 is offline  
Old 01-30-2015, 09:21 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
trashhauler's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Position: B-777
Posts: 455
Default

Originally Posted by TonyC View Post
Sure, there must be a good reason for Howie preferring Article VIII charges, and there must be something I'm not telling. I'm obviously trying to cover up the wrong-doing of the charged members.

Then why is Howie the one refusing to answer simple, direct questions? I asked him to tell us what the charges are -- in public, in front of 50 or so dues-paying members in good standing. Nothing. Wouldn't talk. Lawyered up. He won't tell us what his motivation is. He won't tell us what he thinks those people did wrong. He won't tell us what remedy -- discipline, fine, or expulsion -- he seeks. HE'S the one that needs to be answering questions, not me.


I will not be baited into attepting to divine the motivations of the former Legislative Affairs Committee Chairman, or to guess what he's trying to accomplish. After all, I don't want to be brought up on Article VIII charges for hurting someone's feelings.

It appears that he is unhappy that he was removed from his appointment, and that he believes that he was unfairly punished. (By the way, removing an appointee is not punishment.) It is obvious this is entirely politically motivated -- pure vindictiveness.

And it is obviously done with total disregard for the pilots of FedEx who deserve to be served by a well-functioning MEC. In this case, the pride and ego of a single individual is more important.



But it must be me not telling part of the story ...






.
Wow, calm down Tony. I'm not accusing you of anything. It sounded like to me that you were saying these guys were being charged for no other than political reasons. If that's the case, nothing will come of it. If not, then there may be merit to the charges. As for hurting to continuity and unity of our MEC, that was gone long ago. We have certain MEC members that don't play nice with others. Any way you look at this, it's not good for our pilot group to have such a dysfunctional MEC. Then again, it might be a fair representation of this pilot group
trashhauler is offline  
Old 01-30-2015, 09:43 AM
  #20  
Organizational Learning 
Thread Starter
 
TonyC's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Directly behind the combiner
Posts: 4,948
Default

Originally Posted by trashhauler View Post

Wow, calm down Tony. I'm not accusing you of anything. It sounded like to me that you were saying these guys were being charged for no other than political reasons. If that's the case, nothing will come of it. If not, then there may be merit to the charges. As for hurting to continuity and unity of our MEC, that was gone long ago. We have certain MEC members that don't play nice with others. Any way you look at this, it's not good for our pilot group to have such a dysfunctional MEC. Then again, it might be a fair representation of this pilot group

OK, fair enough. While I do not know the specific charges that were preferred by Howie (that's the reason I asked Howie), he said they were at the request of Eissler. (That's what Howie stated at the Joint Council Meeting.) I believe Eissler's actions are politically motivated, and were precipitated by his removal from his appointment as the chairman of an MEC standing committee. I don't know what he's accusing the 7 ALPA members of doing (that's 1 ALPA First Vice President, 5 MEC members, and 1 other pilot), but I don't think it would be happening if he were still on FDX ALPA Flight Pay Loss instead of flying an airplane on Christmas Day.

We agree on the other stuff.






.
TonyC is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
flapshalfspeed
Major
58
03-10-2015 02:05 PM
Acroflyer32
American
85
02-05-2014 11:10 PM
Regularguy
United
57
03-12-2012 04:46 PM
skippy
GoJet
4
05-11-2009 08:55 PM
CaptMidnight
Cargo
52
04-26-2009 05:49 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices