FDX Rally - Retro Pay
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Position: Bus driver
Posts: 322
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Nov 2014
Position: MD
Posts: 194
2 years of zero pay raises.
3% min per year is simply for inflation. That's 6% with no real gain. Add at least 4% for the new deal. That's a 10% across the board raise. We earned it, we deserve it. The company has certainly enjoyed the savings in drawing this out over time.
A TA of less than a 10% raise should be rejected without hesitation.
3% min per year is simply for inflation. That's 6% with no real gain. Add at least 4% for the new deal. That's a 10% across the board raise. We earned it, we deserve it. The company has certainly enjoyed the savings in drawing this out over time.
A TA of less than a 10% raise should be rejected without hesitation.
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: MD CA
Posts: 705
4% per year is my MINIMUM- So it's 12% now, then 4% for every year going forward. And that's not really much. Maybe a 1-2% real raise for inflation.
Not even close to $ that are predecessors made when adjusted for inflation.
Not even close to $ that are predecessors made when adjusted for inflation.
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: MD11 FO
Posts: 1,108
2 years of zero pay raises.
3% min per year is simply for inflation. That's 6% with no real gain. Add at least 4% for the new deal. That's a 10% across the board raise. We earned it, we deserve it. The company has certainly enjoyed the savings in drawing this out over time.
A TA of less than a 10% raise should be rejected without hesitation.
3% min per year is simply for inflation. That's 6% with no real gain. Add at least 4% for the new deal. That's a 10% across the board raise. We earned it, we deserve it. The company has certainly enjoyed the savings in drawing this out over time.
A TA of less than a 10% raise should be rejected without hesitation.
Last edited by Tuck; 03-02-2015 at 09:13 AM.
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2006
Posts: 498
It should. That is less than what they have saved by dragging it out. Were you thinking there were small numbers involved? That's two years of cheating us. That's your kids college fund. If they want to back pay us less, then make it a three year 401K match. I'll take that smaller number to not pay taxes on it. But the retro pay owed us is big and getting bigger. If you're thinking your portion is only a couple grand or a couple tens of thousands, you are selling yourself really cheaply.
#27
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Nov 2014
Position: MD
Posts: 194
3/2013 thru 2/2014 - 1 year no raise.
3/2014 thru 2/2015 - 2 years no raise.
We're beginning the 3rd year without a raise - technically as of today.
Pretty sure the math is right but it is a complicated equation.
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: leaning to the left
Posts: 4,184
Or, how about this...I did not get a raise on 3/2013, 3/2014 or 3/2015. That would be 3 raises missed...If we had them annually.
This isn't rocket surgery.
#30
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post