![]() |
FDX - MD-11 Disputed pairings JUN15
If you're stupid enough to pick these up, you deserve every plague that besets you.
MEM-OAK, 20:47 or 21:22 layover (the worst -- too long to sleep once, too short to sleep twice) then OAK-RNO, RNO-MEM -- 7:19 Duty IF Reno can turn you in 1:27 -- don't hold your breath. Trip 416 06JUN Trip 416 13JUN Trip 438 20JUN Trip 416 27JUN Let 'em rot in Open Time, brothers. . |
So if the layover was shorter, you would be ok with it?
|
Originally Posted by Doorknob
(Post 1891120)
So if the layover was shorter, you would be ok with it? No, for 2 reasons. First, and most important, the PSIT disputed it, so I won't be good with it. Second, it would exceed 8 block hours in 24 clock hours, so the FAA would frown on it. It's disputed, what other explanation is required? . |
8 in 24 has nothing to do with it.
|
Originally Posted by Doorknob
(Post 1891174)
8 in 24 has nothing to do with it. Both problems could be resolved by LENGTHENING the layover to observe normal circadian sleep patterns. . |
The layover could be as short as 10 hours and still be legal for 8 in 24 purposes. You seem to be up on the FARs as you post them frequently. I'm not saying it's a good trip I was just wondering why you were complaining about a long layover and implying a shorter layover would be better so you could just sleep once.
|
June Open Time has been out for 15 hours, and they are still in there!
|
Originally Posted by Doorknob
(Post 1891269)
The layover could be as short as 10 hours and still be legal for 8 in 24 purposes. You seem to be up on the FARs as you post them frequently. I'm not saying it's a good trip I was just wondering why you were complaining about a long layover and implying a shorter layover would be better so you could just sleep once.
|
Originally Posted by Doorknob
(Post 1891269)
I'm not saying it's a good trip I was just wondering why you were complaining about a long layover and implying a shorter layover would be better so you could just sleep once.
|
Originally Posted by Doorknob
(Post 1891269)
The layover could be as short as 10 hours and still be legal for 8 in 24 purposes. You seem to be up on the FARs as you post them frequently. I'm not saying it's a good trip I was just wondering why you were complaining about a long layover and implying a shorter layover would be better so you could just sleep once. Trip 416 has a 20:47 layover and 33:47 TAFB. Shorten the layover to 10:00, and the TAFB becomes 23:00. Please show me the math where you can fit 8:33 block hours in there legally. . |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:08 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands