Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Strike Vote at UPS!

Old 09-09-2015, 02:51 PM
  #11  
With The Resistance
 
jungle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Posts: 6,191
Default

Originally Posted by UPSFO4LIFE View Post
NO contract has been settled between UPS and its pilots without a strike vote authorization.
Yes, as the Kabuki unfolds according to script we may also expect multicolored lanyards to appear, threats of contract aircraft to cover peak and laments about profitability.

It is a pattern repeated every time, it is as old as the migration of birds and nearly as messy.

Standard stuff, remain calm and reload.
jungle is offline  
Old 09-09-2015, 03:29 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ClutchCargo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: FDX MD11 Capt in MEM
Posts: 885
Default

Originally Posted by DangaZone View Post

So. We can expect to see a UPS T/A in about a year then...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ClutchCargo is offline  
Old 09-09-2015, 03:33 PM
  #13  
With The Resistance
 
jungle's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Burning the Agitprop of the Apparat
Posts: 6,191
Default

Originally Posted by ClutchCargo View Post
So. We can expect to see a UPS T/A in about a year then...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Maybe, and the retro pay won't cover our cost. Just as the sun rises in the east.
jungle is offline  
Old 09-09-2015, 08:55 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: MD CA
Posts: 705
Default

It's BACK Pay. Not some BS Retro.
Commando is offline  
Old 09-09-2015, 09:00 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
NoHaz's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Position: let it snow, let it snow, let it snow
Posts: 828
Default

more like 50% on the back pay dollar "signing bonus"
NoHaz is offline  
Old 09-10-2015, 08:04 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2014
Position: MD
Posts: 194
Default

I wish the FDX pilot group had the cajones of the UPS group.
Over the course of unionized work on property, there is no comparison to the difference in unity and resolve between the two groups.

At FDX, it's all about the individual pilot - particularly in the short term.

Our TA will be distributed to all in the industry in short order.
Read between the lines.
This is a COLA TA with minor improvements and significant concessionary givebacks in QOL and productivity gains (scheduling).
Our union leadership touts it as industry leading.
For how long? A month?

The Delta pilots had the resolve to vote their concessionary TA down because they saw the crap-storm looming.
Unfortunately, we don't have the cajones at FDX to see it for what it is ... a POS TA.
GetRealDude is offline  
Old 09-10-2015, 09:39 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2006
Position: 767 FO
Posts: 8,047
Default

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=BrC136cydlw
FDXLAG is offline  
Old 09-11-2015, 12:03 AM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,339
Default

Originally Posted by ClutchCargo View Post
How'd that work out for the IPA last time they did this?
Cliffs notes on this specific subject (of what I remember) from a gmm meeting.

To answer your question - it worked out GREAT! Approximately $1.4 billion in pay and benefit improvements back then. Within weeks negotiations switched from significant pay cut demands to large pay raises.

Originally Posted by ClutchCargo View Post
My memory may be faulty but I seem to remember IPA taking a strike vote very early in the negotiating process that led to your 2006 contract. I remember that the NMB felt that by voting to strike so early in negotiations IPA was not negotiating in good faith. As a result negotiations were put on hold for some lengthy time.

Those in the know feel free to slam my recollection of events.
Your memory is faulty. There's no such thing as "too early" of a strike vote. Too early? Really? The union had been in fruitless negotiations for several years by the time the vote was taken.
The union communicates potential strike vote intentions to the mediators before such a vote. Had they felt it was too early they'd have expressed those views then. They didn't! While they'll never say do it or don't do it there's never any doubt of the mediators' opinions on such matters.

Don't know crap on the subject but I'm betting on a TA 6-12 months after the vote and the follow-up survey. Just my personal views on this.
I'm ready for the vote and I'm saving up just in case we get released. While most people say it'll never happen the union leadership was clear - be prepared because stranger things have happened.
whalesurfer is offline  
Old 09-13-2015, 07:46 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Vito's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: 757/767 Capt
Posts: 642
Default

Whale surfer,
Good response to ClutchCargo's statement. I was wondering why CC thought we somehow got screwed in the last contract round. the decline of our schedule quality occurred because of many factors not necessarily related to our contract ( at least most thought at the time of signing, before the company came up with some creative workarounds)
Vito is offline  
Old 09-13-2015, 02:56 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
ClutchCargo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: FDX MD11 Capt in MEM
Posts: 885
Default

Thanks for the clarification. I never thought you got screwed. Just that it took 13 months to get a T/A from the time you took the strike vote.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ClutchCargo is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EV120
Cargo
83
06-25-2011 04:47 PM
TonyWilliams
Cargo
250
09-09-2010 04:31 PM
767pilot
Cargo
113
10-15-2009 06:19 PM
Cujo
Cargo
4
10-01-2007 10:08 PM
767pilot
Cargo
53
09-28-2007 05:50 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices