Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Cargo (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/cargo/)
-   -   FedEx Passover Pay (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/cargo/9542-fedex-passover-pay.html)

SNAFU 02-25-2007 06:01 PM


Originally Posted by pinseeker (Post 124313)
What you seem to be missing is that these individuals bid out of ANC on a following bid and had not started training for ANC yet. They were then trained for ANC and did a touch and go there and then came to MEM ahead of all those that bid MEM on the same bid they did. Their ANC bid should have been canx and then trained in seniority order for MEM.

As far as gaming the system goes, we shouldn't have to game the system, especially when it comes to seniority. We are always told to bid what and where you want to fly.

If you don't have all of the info, maybe you shouldn't talk about the contract being clear in the area under dicussion, because it is clear to those of us who were affected.

Yes, bid what you want to fly. If you wanted ANC you should have bid it. A couple of guys transferring domiciles doesn't trigger passover pay. If the guy(s) didn't ever activate in ANC then yes they shouldn't have been trained ahead of senior guys waiting for training for MEM. The company should have pulled them out of training and put them back on the panel or right seat and let you guys go to training. That would likely have been the result of a grievance which is evidently what the union was trying to prevent. Just a guess.

I know it sounds condescending and I don't mean it to. I've only been here about 5 years, so I am a newbie too. The tone of the complaints is very off-putting and that is why you guys are not getting the support that you deserve. Yeah I spent my first two years on the panel on reserve and couldn't even sniff the right seat of the Boeing for 3 years, so I have difficulty seeing how the guys here a year or so feel slighted because a couple of guys got a better deal than them.

I know a lot of guys in Flight Test tried to volunteer to go fetch those 75s like they do every other new (to us) aircraft and none of them were selected to do so. Two wrongs don't make a right, and the union officials should have been more responsive, respectful and representative to your guys' concerns, that is for sure. I still don't see the huge injustice that many seem to feel though, because I am not all about the money I guess.

Anyway, I have dug myself a hole I had no intention of digging, I wish you all the best and I hope you all get your widebody training soon. I also hope the union officials see the need for a wakeup call before they really do damage to the unity we displayed over the past 2.5 years.

130JDrvr 02-25-2007 07:48 PM


Originally Posted by pinseeker (Post 124313)
What you seem to be missing is that these individuals bid out of ANC on a following bid and had not started training for ANC yet. They were then trained for ANC and did a touch and go there and then came to MEM ahead of all those that bid MEM on the same bid they did. Their ANC bid should have been canx and then trained in seniority order for MEM.

As far as gaming the system goes, we shouldn't have to game the system, especially when it comes to seniority. We are always told to bid what and where you want to fly.

If you don't have all of the info, maybe you shouldn't talk about the contract being clear in the area under dicussion, because it is clear to those of us who were affected.


It's late but let me take a shot at this. X bids ANC 11 fo on bid 1. Is assigned a training date prior to y who bid MEM 11 FO. On bid 2, X bids back to MEM and is activated prior to Y which bid it on bid 1. I think that's it.


It doesn't matter what x did on the second bid. If he stayed in ANC or not. The reason being is that that training slot will be filled by an ANC FO. Person Y would have never seen that training slot anyway.


Just the way it has been for awhile here..... As far a gaming the system, the company doesn't even know what their doing in 18 months. Long range planning here is next week.

Past....

fdx727pilot 02-25-2007 08:06 PM


Originally Posted by pinseeker (Post 124313)
What you seem to be missing is that these individuals bid out of ANC on a following bid and had not started training for ANC yet. They were then trained for ANC and did a touch and go there and then came to MEM ahead of all those that bid MEM on the same bid they did. Their ANC bid should have been canx and then trained in seniority order for MEM.

It's never worked that way. The same scenario occured after the postal bid, but the ANC guys from the pre-Postal bid still went to their original training (after postal bid,) activated in ANC, and then transfered to MEM. In this case, however, there were no Purple nuggets to help them get out of ANC and some of those guys didn't get back to MEM until months after guys of their seniority who got MEM on the 2nd bid had activated. Did they think they got a bad deal? Yes! Was it legal by the CBA? Yes? Is life always fair? No! Get over it.

Gunter 02-25-2007 08:47 PM


Originally Posted by fdx727pilot (Post 124368)
It's never worked that way. The same scenario occured after the postal bid, but the ANC guys from the pre-Postal bid still went to their original training (after postal bid,) activated in ANC, and then transfered to MEM. In this case, however, there were no Purple nuggets to help them get out of ANC and some of those guys didn't get back to MEM until months after guys of their seniority who got MEM on the 2nd bid had activated. Did they think they got a bad deal? Yes! Was it legal by the CBA? Yes? Is life always fair? No! Get over it.



Very good info. The history preceding current events is enlightening.

I certainly have no disappointment considering it is such a good deal to hop into a widebody in one or two years here.

But I do hope the FDX Alpa website gets some good articles explaining historical precedent and how it relates to bidding and the contract so others won't get surprised again. It would save the membership and ALPA reps some wasted brain cells.

pinseeker 02-26-2007 02:48 AM


Originally Posted by fdx727pilot (Post 124368)
It's never worked that way. The same scenario occured after the postal bid, but the ANC guys from the pre-Postal bid still went to their original training (after postal bid,) activated in ANC, and then transfered to MEM. In this case, however, there were no Purple nuggets to help them get out of ANC and some of those guys didn't get back to MEM until months after guys of their seniority who got MEM on the 2nd bid had activated. Did they think they got a bad deal? Yes! Was it legal by the CBA? Yes? Is life always fair? No! Get over it.

And the company testified in 02-02 that a following bid canx a previous bid if training hasn't started yet. The argument is that the contract should specify what happens when someone switches domiciles and hasn't started training for the first bid yet. Because it has happened in the past doesn't cut it. It should be in writing and as CB has been saying, both the company and ALPA have said it is a grey area. The company shouldn't be able to decide at their whim that one day they will canx training for a bid and the next day decide they won't. It needs to be written in the contract, and as of now, it still isn't. Before you say get over it again, Don't.

Coffee Bitch 02-26-2007 04:09 AM

Wrong, Wrong, Wrong (as usual)
 

Originally Posted by SNAFU (Post 124322)
I know a lot of guys in Flight Test tried to volunteer to go fetch those 75s like they do every other new (to us) aircraft and none of them were selected to do so.

1234567890

bifff15 02-26-2007 04:35 AM

It's all fun and games until someone gets and eye poked out. Then it's just fun...

fdx727pilot 02-26-2007 08:14 AM


Originally Posted by pinseeker (Post 124433)
Before you say get over it again, Don't.

I say get over it, because in my experience with FPA and ALPA, the union won't press on an issue that affects only a few people (less than several hundred,) especially if the affected pilots are all junior. Not the way I would wish it to be, but that's the way it is!

Huck 02-26-2007 10:21 AM


1234567890
Good call... You learn well, grasshoppah....

Albief15 05-21-2007 07:54 PM

Bump.

This needs to be read and reread by the junior guys. There was a lot foreshadowing of the events of last month as long ago as February.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:12 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands