Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Vintage plane crash (video) >

Vintage plane crash (video)

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Vintage plane crash (video)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-29-2005, 05:57 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
SWAjet's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2005
Position: B737 Captain
Posts: 437
Default Vintage plane crash (video)

What type of aircraft is this (warning: plane crash footage)?? I wonder what happened.
http://www.big-boys.com/articles/oldplanecrash.html
SWAjet is offline  
Old 08-29-2005, 07:15 PM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
jzuniga's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: 777 bound!
Posts: 242
Default

Looks like a DeHavilland Caribou...I met a guy yrs. ago flying in the bush who's dad was killed flying one of those. I don't know if it was that same one. he said the freight shifted back on rotation moving the CG...bummer!
Z
jzuniga is offline  
Old 08-29-2005, 08:12 PM
  #3  
Line Holder
 
Was That For Us?'s Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2005
Position: Airbus A320 F/O
Posts: 95
Default

I found this via Google:
This accident ironically occurred in Manitoba, at Gimli – the site of the Air Canada 767 fuel-exhaustion incident.

The aircraft involved was an experimental, modified version of the Caribou which had undergone conversion to turbine power, and was being tested to check fuel and hydraulic systems on the date of the crash, 27 August 1992.

Although the aircraft apparently rotates and climbs normally, photographic evidence indicates that control-surface movement was minimal, suggesting that the gust-locks were engaged.

While there was elevator movement upon rotation, the elevators returned to the neutral position and remained there. This is in line with the operation of the gust-lock – if the control surfaces are not in the neutral position when the lock is engaged, movement of the surfaces through neutral will engage it.

In addition to preventing control-surface movement, the gust-lock lever is supposed to inhibit the power levers to prevent the pilot from applying take-off power. It was found that the aircraft’s take-off distance was 20% longer than expected.

Wreckage analysis determined that the rudder lock was fully engaged and the aileron lock had only been disengaged at the moment of impact, supporting the conclusion that the gust-lock system had not been fully disengaged ahead of the flight, and that at least some of the locks had engaged after take-off.
Was That For Us? is offline  
Old 08-31-2005, 06:12 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
PILOTGUY's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2005
Posts: 521
Default

Thanks for that info. At least it explains the extremely high angle of climb.
PILOTGUY is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fireman0174
Major
7
05-02-2006 04:36 PM
SWAjet
Hangar Talk
0
03-14-2006 06:52 AM
Gordon C
Hangar Talk
0
06-28-2005 05:19 AM
SWAjet
Hangar Talk
1
06-15-2005 03:04 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices