Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Charter
Atlas Air pilot negotiations >

Atlas Air pilot negotiations

Notices
Charter Part 121 pax charter airlines

Atlas Air pilot negotiations

Old 12-04-2017, 09:53 PM
  #51  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 83
Default

Originally Posted by kolt66 View Post
I would assume there's a huge migration of pilots from Atlas to the legacy carriers right now. Is that true? I know there are some serious issues going on between management and the pilots but doesn't Atlas need a new contract to stop the hemorrhaging and keep themselves in business?

Or is it not that serious for them and they think they can survive just fine with the current contract?
THey think they're going to survive with current contract. Meanwhile there is a 65% attrition rate they are just looking the other way because the training department seems to be keeping up. For now.

Meanwhile the operation is a disaster. Flights run not just minutes or hours late. But days. Customers not happy. They will lose business if they haven't already. Perhaps that is part of the plan. Lose business, hit bottom, need to restructure. Contract will be another bankruptcy contract. Why come just to potentially get furloughed???
Stratocruzr is offline  
Old 02-07-2018, 06:35 PM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Groundpointfife's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Position: On guard
Posts: 154
Default

With the recent survey sent out by the union, how did everyone answer?

My personal thoughts:
On par with AA, DL, UA etc compensation. Top of the scale within a few bucks.
Higher monthly guarantee closer to 75 hours, that is pay protected.
16% DC into 401k
Lower insurance premiums.
Minimum day credit of 5 hours.
Line holder days off 15 per 30 day bid period.
Reserve days off 14 per 30 day bid period.
Etc.

Possibly just my wishful thinking. Although if you don’t ask for much, you are already setting the bar low.

Aim high, and even if they don’t give you everything, it is still vast improvement/closer to what you really want.
Groundpointfife is offline  
Old 02-07-2018, 07:01 PM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2008
Position: F-16
Posts: 185
Default

Originally Posted by Groundpointfife View Post
With the recent survey sent out by the union, how did everyone answer?

My personal thoughts:
On par with AA, DL, UA etc compensation. Top of the scale within a few bucks.
Higher monthly guarantee closer to 75 hours, that is pay protected.
16% DC into 401k
Lower insurance premiums.
Minimum day credit of 5 hours.
Line holder days off 15 per 30 day bid period.
Reserve days off 14 per 30 day bid period.
Etc.

Possibly just my wishful thinking. Although if you don’t ask for much, you are already setting the bar low.

Aim high, and even if they don’t give you everything, it is still vast improvement/closer to what you really want.
I don't negotiate in public nor do I tell the company on a public website what they can get me to accept. My inputs on the survey are private for the negotiating committee.
Droopy is offline  
Old 02-07-2018, 07:22 PM
  #54  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Groundpointfife's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Position: On guard
Posts: 154
Default

Originally Posted by Droopy View Post
I don't negotiate in public nor do I tell the company on a public website what they can get me to accept. My inputs on the survey are private for the negotiating committee.
What if they see on a public forum that people are only willing to accept industry standard to industry leading?
Groundpointfife is offline  
Old 02-07-2018, 07:53 PM
  #55  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DC8DRIVER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: 747
Posts: 1,290
Default

Originally Posted by Groundpointfife View Post
What if they see on a public forum that people are only willing to accept industry standard to industry leading?
The only input the company should have is from the NC. Any information they can glean from message boards can be used against us during the process of negotiations. Even little things that seem completely innocent or favorable for our negotiators could be detrimental. I know it doesn't sound like that makes any sense, but our negotiation/survey talks should stay off line and, preferably, face to face with fellow pilots.
DC8DRIVER is offline  
Old 02-07-2018, 11:40 PM
  #56  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Groundpointfife's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Position: On guard
Posts: 154
Default

I think the hole in that logic is that some of your fellow pilots are not fully educated on what other companies offer. How do you suggest remedying that?

In a discussion with my peers when I was explaining that the legacies and SWA offer 15-16% directly into the 401k, they asked matching, I had to tell them, NO, it is put in by the company before any employee contributions.

So I think we need to do a better job explaining what peers at the legacies, FedEx and UPS actually get compensated. The graphics provided were good, but it would be better if everyone understood them.
Groundpointfife is offline  
Old 02-08-2018, 05:59 AM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,236
Default

Originally Posted by DC8DRIVER View Post
The only input the company should have is from the NC. Any information they can glean from message boards can be used against us during the process of negotiations. Even little things that seem completely innocent or favorable for our negotiators could be detrimental. I know it doesn't sound like that makes any sense, but our negotiation/survey talks should stay off line and, preferably, face to face with fellow pilots.
If Bill Flynn has taken a peak at Giant Comms then I'm pretty sure we're all screwed then... I mean... All we need is 1 to 1 Dead Head and that fixes everything! We might as well just give up.
Globemaster2827 is offline  
Old 02-08-2018, 06:26 AM
  #58  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Groundpointfife's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2017
Position: On guard
Posts: 154
Default

Originally Posted by Globemaster2827 View Post
If Bill Flynn has taken a peak at Giant Comms then I'm pretty sure we're all screwed then... I mean... All we need is 1 to 1 Dead Head and that fixes everything! We might as well just give up.
People are also voting with their feet. Having captain upgrades quit in the middle of class is quite a statement. I'd consider that a vote of no confidence.
Groundpointfife is offline  
Old 02-08-2018, 06:50 AM
  #59  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DC8DRIVER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: 747
Posts: 1,290
Default

Originally Posted by Groundpointfife View Post
I think the hole in that logic is that some of your fellow pilots are not fully educated on what other companies offer. How do you suggest remedying that?
Explaining what other carriers have is not necessarily discussing our contract needs, but to answer your question, discuss out contractual needs anywhere the company can not have access to that information i. e. not on line.

Also, the union contract comparison guide retirement chart is pretty clear about Atlas being one of the only airlines that requires matching contributions ...
DC8DRIVER is offline  
Old 02-08-2018, 06:52 AM
  #60  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DC8DRIVER's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Position: 747
Posts: 1,290
Default

Originally Posted by Groundpointfife View Post
People are also voting with their feet. Having captain upgrades quit in the middle of class is quite a statement. I'd consider that a vote of no confidence.
^^^^^ +++1 ^^^^^
DC8DRIVER is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Freightbird
FedEx
22
08-12-2016 11:12 PM
MD-11Loader
Atlas/Polar
212
05-06-2016 10:20 AM
GIANT PILOT
Cargo
33
06-13-2008 05:22 PM
Deez340
Regional
160
05-06-2008 09:41 PM
Jurassic Jet
Cargo
26
11-15-2007 07:16 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices