Search
Notices
Charter Part 121 pax charter airlines

Swift Air - The truth

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-02-2019, 07:55 AM
  #481  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Posts: 38
Default

Originally Posted by 4runner View Post
The DOD won’t allow for A330’s. It’s been tried. More BS from people that don’t know what they’re talking about and making noise to sound as if they’re in the know.
The DOD will allow any aircraft type with a non-experimental Airworthiness Certificate issued by the FAA. The only restriction on aircraft provided in airlift operations (in my experience) was the length of time the aircraft was in service prior to beginning operations. I’m 99% sure an aircraft has to have been in service(scheduled/regular use) by the carrier for at least 366 days prior to commencement of first charter flight.

Waivers may be obtained, but unlikely to be granted as Swift is not a major player in the DOD/DOS/AMC market.

So to recap, once Swift receives the aircraft they must wait a year(minimum) after said aircraft enter into operations in order to be eligible to provide this type of lift.*

*All the above is only applicable when the carrier has been found to be acceptable by the DOD/DOS/AMC.

From reading these forums though I can tell Swift may have an issue when they have to explain:

How Captains are upgraded? Why turnover is so high? Why they have had to previously hire contract pilots? What safety systems are in place to ensure pilots and management are working towards safe operations? The countries in which pilots hold Certificates? The experience level of all pilots?

Then the best part- an overview of all incidents and accidents during a given time frame and how they have worked to prevent them from reoccurring.

I personally think it would be hilarious to witness the faces made during these audits for approval. Best part is, all of this will be available thanks to FOIA once an application is made.

Maybe then we can find out why Mexi stays at Swift 😉

Last edited by TikkleMe; 07-02-2019 at 08:12 AM.
TikkleMe is offline  
Old 07-02-2019, 08:09 AM
  #482  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Posts: 578
Default

Not true. A certain operator proposed to get 330’s. They were told no, due to national security. If a war pops off, the DOD wants domestic aircraft so that aircraft remains serviceable and not reliant on a foreign government for parts. Other government agencies may not care. Especially ICE.
4runner is offline  
Old 07-02-2019, 01:56 PM
  #483  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Posts: 303
Default

Originally Posted by 4runner View Post
Not true. A certain operator proposed to get 330’s. They were told no, due to national security. If a war pops off, the DOD wants domestic aircraft so that aircraft remains serviceable and not reliant on a foreign government for parts. Other government agencies may not care. Especially ICE.
Then how did USAir participate in CRAF with their 330s back in the day?
Cicada is offline  
Old 07-02-2019, 02:47 PM
  #484  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2009
Posts: 578
Default

Originally Posted by Cicada View Post
Then how did USAir participate in CRAF with their 330s back in the day?
That’s participating. That’s being activitated by the DOD. Initially, the DOD said that an operator can only have a certain percentage of their business from the military. A certain ACMI operator told them that in order to maintain readiness and capacity, they needed a certain guarantee. That exemption was granted. Then said ACMI proposed buying Airbus. The DOD said no. There you have it.
4runner is offline  
Old 07-02-2019, 06:13 PM
  #485  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2019
Posts: 38
Default

Originally Posted by 4runner View Post
That’s participating. That’s being activitated by the DOD. Initially, the DOD said that an operator can only have a certain percentage of their business from the military. A certain ACMI operator told them that in order to maintain readiness and capacity, they needed a certain guarantee. That exemption was granted. Then said ACMI proposed buying Airbus. The DOD said no. There you have it.
I’m not sure where you get your information from but a restriction on the A330 in particular is non-existent. Ryan, and Delta, both operated A330’s for the DOD. Delta still operates A330’s for the DOD but usually the determining factor is airframe and crew availability (plus capacity).

Another point in the audit of DOD flying is Maintenance programs and parts on hand. You must satisfy that you have a significant parts inventory or be available to source parts through agreements.

But, let’s get back to Swift.
TikkleMe is offline  
Old 07-02-2019, 10:32 PM
  #486  
Gets Weekends Off
 
mexipilot84's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Gear Handle supervisor
Posts: 1,035
Default

As someone mentioned there’s multiple carriers flying the a330 for the DOD. Yes it takes a year of flying to be able to introduce the type into the market. But I think their focus is more on the European market from South America. I guess there’s a lot of European companies that want lift in that direction.

We have the DOD approval for the 737. We just don’t have any contracts since we got signed off in the fall. Not to mention I’m sure it would involve using 800s for lift. They’re all in Europe getting worked to the bone.

Our DO looks he’s leaving for a better opportunity. Hopefully something less stressful.


Also why am I going to jump around airlines? I’m not going to change airlines every year like some guys do, that’s a lot of instability for ones family. Not to mention it’s horrible for your resume. I make ok money here and I’m senior enough to have a decent life here for now and take care of the family. It’s not all flowers and Daisy’s but it is what it is, I know it’ll get better, it has over several years. I’ve been here long enough to have a comparison. I make the best of the situation, for me it’s still a fun time. When it starts becoming work is when it’s time to go.
mexipilot84 is offline  
Old 07-03-2019, 05:29 AM
  #487  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Feb 2019
Posts: 39
Default

Off track, grammar nazi here. I wish they proof read emails for grammar and spelling errors before shooting out a pilot wide email. My head is hurting from run on sentences.
Toby Flenderson is offline  
Old 07-03-2019, 04:37 PM
  #488  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Beaver Hunter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2007
Posts: 294
Default

I have been reading the post for the last few weeks. I can’t believe anyone would work for these douche bags. Wtf!!
Beaver Hunter is offline  
Old 07-04-2019, 05:30 AM
  #489  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Position: It has wings and I sit left.Sometimes.
Posts: 181
Default

Originally Posted by Beaver Hunter View Post
I have been reading the post for the last few weeks. I can’t believe anyone would work for these douche bags. Wtf!!
Well said Capt Hunter
FmrPropCapt is offline  
Old 07-05-2019, 02:31 PM
  #490  
Gets Weekends Off
 
mexipilot84's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: Gear Handle supervisor
Posts: 1,035
Default

Originally Posted by randomroute View Post
CP with the last indoc class:









Does anyone in Europe know if the COO has arrived and mentioned anything about pay?


Posted it days ago
mexipilot84 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
avi8tor220
Air Wisconsin
6751
05-07-2019 11:11 AM
lwaddle
Hiring News
24
04-15-2018 02:22 PM
jeff122670
Hangar Talk
9
05-01-2013 07:14 PM
Duksrule
Hangar Talk
4
11-09-2011 06:56 AM
FastDEW
Major
201
09-03-2011 06:42 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices