Swift Air - The truth
01-26-2020, 10:21 AM
#923
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2017
Position: B767
Posts: 376
Originally Posted by Triggs
Never made it on property. Rescinded his acceptance of the offer because he was uncomfortable with the culture here
hella
01-26-2020, 03:00 PM
#926
Line Holder
Joined APC: Jan 2020
Posts: 57
Originally Posted by Jeff90
Still caring after you leave I see, I can promise you let the “heavy hitters” watch me, I have no explaining to do because I’m honest with every single person that walks through the door. But thanks dude 👌
01-29-2020, 12:37 PM
#928
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2010
Posts: 167
Uncomfortable with the culture
Originally Posted by Triggs
Never made it on property. Rescinded his acceptance of the offer because he was uncomfortable with the culture here
The FAA got a tip that Swift went into Blue1, and changed records for flight and duty time to show an individual was legal, when that person was not. The FAA preliminary investigation showed that the records were changed, and that they paid the individual 250% extra for doing the flight illegally. If this is true, what does that say about the people that allowed, or perhaps ordered it.
IS IT NOT " A SAFETY CULTURE THAT PREVENTS THIS "
01-30-2020, 07:21 AM
#929
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2016
Posts: 233
Originally Posted by MNPS 50N50W
RUMORS... is this true. Can anyone share any information on what actually happened.
The FAA got a tip that Swift went into Blue1, and changed records for flight and duty time to show an individual was legal, when that person was not. The FAA preliminary investigation showed that the records were changed, and that they paid the individual 250% extra for doing the flight illegally. If this is true, what does that say about the people that allowed, or perhaps ordered it.
IS IT NOT " A SAFETY CULTURE THAT PREVENTS THIS "
The FAA got a tip that Swift went into Blue1, and changed records for flight and duty time to show an individual was legal, when that person was not. The FAA preliminary investigation showed that the records were changed, and that they paid the individual 250% extra for doing the flight illegally. If this is true, what does that say about the people that allowed, or perhaps ordered it.
IS IT NOT " A SAFETY CULTURE THAT PREVENTS THIS "
01-30-2020, 08:33 AM
#930
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Position: B-737NG preferably in first class with a glass of champagne and caviar
Posts: 5,906
Originally Posted by Jeff90
man I guess people don’t think this could ever come back to their certificate
From the WSJ
Southwest Flew Millions on Jets With Unconfirmed Maintenance Records, Government Report Says
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
