DA50 Overrun at KGMU
#1
DA50 Overrun at KGMU
#2
That crew was very lame itself.
Not qualified to be PIC.
Had been flying an unairworthy aircraft WITH PASSENGERS.
Another PIC knew of the problems and didn't write them up - just verbal debrief (?)
Psuedo-PIC knew of the issues having flown as SIC the previous 4 flights and still didn't perform the procedures on landing.
This mishap reeks of the stink that shady 134.5 operators bring onto the industry IMO.
Not qualified to be PIC.
Had been flying an unairworthy aircraft WITH PASSENGERS.
Another PIC knew of the problems and didn't write them up - just verbal debrief (?)
Psuedo-PIC knew of the issues having flown as SIC the previous 4 flights and still didn't perform the procedures on landing.
This mishap reeks of the stink that shady 134.5 operators bring onto the industry IMO.
#4
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: CA
Posts: 1,027
#8
Just my 2 cents: I think anytime there is that much blatant disregard for rules / regulations that the question of oversight would naturally come up. The NTSB report seemed very thin considering some of the factors involved with this crash. Sometimes shining a spotlight on the undermanned / underfunded agency tasked with ensuring the safety of the flying public might not be a good idea.
#9
What if they knew about trying to get it back up working again but the flights were under the table?
Did this company already have a 'rap sheet' with the POIs?
If they did I could see tighter scrutiny, if not until something happens....
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post