![]() |
Originally Posted by Arliss
(Post 2598489)
Well hot digity I do fly in EWR. I'm EWR based with the company that gave you those nice XRs. We're pulling at or better than UAX average and we don't even really try. Republic does a lot of EWR flying for UA and their numbers are decent as well.
|
Ah that's interesting. When UA has to issue delays they give the worst to C5 because they can "hide" due to lack of DOT reporting. I guess that's smart then lol.
|
I spoke with our DOO the other day and apparently the DOT reporting requirements have changed (at least regarding DOT focus flights). In the past those legs could be juggled between different regional partners in order to reset the DOT focus clock. Now it's dependant on the mothership carrier.
|
Originally Posted by Arliss
(Post 2599494)
Ah that's interesting. When UA has to issue delays they give the worst to C5 because they can "hide" due to lack of DOT reporting. I guess that's smart then lol.
|
Originally Posted by PosRateGearUp
(Post 2599363)
Both XJT and RPA are large enough to report these stats to DOT. Currently C5 is not large enough to require said reporting. On any day in EWR with a GDP you will see that C5 gets the longer delay times, this comes from the SOC. The reason C5 gets the longer delays is because of the lack of DOT reporting requirements.
|
Originally Posted by Flyhayes
(Post 2599816)
I spoke with our DOO the other day and apparently the DOT reporting requirements have changed (at least regarding DOT focus flights). In the past those legs could be juggled between different regional partners in order to reset the DOT focus clock. Now it's dependant on the mothership carrier.
|
Originally Posted by PosRateGearUp
(Post 2599865)
This is true for focus cities, they can juggle the longer delays to other cities in that case. The airline reporting overall is another story. If you go to the DOT website to look at stats there is not an option for C5. There is, however, an option for YX and EV.
https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.nytimes.com/2017/09/18/business/airline-on-time-data.amp.html |
Originally Posted by N1234
(Post 2600037)
About to change
https://www.google.com/amp/s/mobile.nytimes.com/2017/09/18/business/airline-on-time-data.amp.html https://www.bts.gov/topics/airlines-and-airports/number-27-technical-directive-time-reporting-effective-jan-1-2018 “2. For calendar year 2018, there are 18 air carriers that reached the reporting threshold of $453,130,000 in domestic scheduled passenger revenues (0.5 percent of total domestic scheduled-service passenger revenues). The revenues were measured for the 12-month period ending December 31, 2016. These carriers must submit on-time performance data to the Department for calendar year 2018.” |
Your numbers actually look pretty good for today. I'm happy to see SkyPest bringing up the rear :D
|
Finished May ranked #3 amongst the UAX carriers in composit performance.
Third month in a row ranked #1 in controllable cancelations. (73 days running without a controllable cancel.) Kind of like how Continental was some years ago. Its operational performance improved for quite a while before the public perception caught up to match it. Keep hiring enough qualified pilots and mechanics, this should continue. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:44 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands