Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Compass Airlines (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/compass-airlines/)
-   -   Compass updates (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/compass-airlines/43113-compass-updates.html)

Justdoinmyjob 05-26-2010 03:54 AM


Originally Posted by iamadc8pilot (Post 816941)
Sorry guys, but I still have heartburn about the whole CompAss thing anyways. Your airline, and to a large extent, the pilots themselves, are the reason a 13 year NWA/DAL pilot cannot hold a Captain spot. You effectivley usurped seniority so if you have to wait another 3 month to flow up, BFD

Considering the most junior captains at DAL are 1999 hires, (making them 11 years,) I'd say you got it wrong.


Originally Posted by Oberon (Post 817083)
Compass Pilots,

Before you post please consider the ramifications your words may have for flow-ups at Delta. There is no reason to engage someone looking to start a fight on Flightinfo. You will not change his mind but you may inadvertently influence someone who hasn't formed an opinion of Compass.


Please don't feed the troll!


Originally Posted by XtremeF150 (Post 817190)
Oberon is right. This guy or gal is so not worth the time. I doubt he or she is even a DAL pilot. Just another troll that wishes to get a rise.

Didn't know we still operated DC-8s! But even if he/she is, they are most likely very junior and don't have all the facts. While I joke around and say, "There goes my captain's seat," as a Compass plane passes by, the truth is that (mis)Management, and the quest for concessions is the biggest reason we are where we are.

johnso29 05-26-2010 08:16 AM


Originally Posted by XtremeF150 (Post 817192)
On another note after talking with some other guys today I have seen where this holdback could cause more of us not to make the cutoff. So in light of this maybe we should send some emails to the union to see if anything can be worked out. It was said today by EM that there would be no flowing out of seniority order per the contract. This sentence was meant to stop the company from picking and choosing who was going NOT stop every CA at Compass because they want to hold back a few checkairmen.
I can understand them wanting to hold a few checkairmen briefly to train the next checkairmen. However the other CA's need to go. This will ensure that we have 20 pilots per month of hiring taking place.
If this doesn't occur then those 2 classes of 30 pilots will be all from the street. (Assuming Mesaba holds some guys too) Initially this might seem ok but this will mean

2 classes of 30 from street + 29 from Compass/Mesaba (only given #'s) =89

This will mean in 3 months time they would hit 267 (not including the callbacks)

Looking at it like this we would be lucky to see 60 ppl flow more likely 40. This is a real possiblity that we need to try and prevent.

When NWA was running classes in 07/08 they did hold guys back at Mesaba because they needed to replace their empty Mesaba seat. However, these flow ups received a seniority # for the class they were originally awarded and just went to training later. That resulted in many being able to go straight to the 320, as many newhires held the 320 1 month into training and never had to go to the DC9 if they didn't want to.

I don't know if this resulted in less flow ups or not, just thought I'd share FWIW.

cfiguy11 05-26-2010 11:12 AM

does anyone know if the written test that Compass gives during the phase 1 interview is from the ATP question bank or do they make up there own questions?

paxhauler85 05-26-2010 11:18 AM


Originally Posted by cfiguy11 (Post 817409)
does anyone know if the written test that Compass gives during the phase 1 interview is from the ATP question bank or do they make up there own questions?

From what I understand, it is similar to the test administered to Delta interviewees in the past 3 years.

There is some gouge out there on willflyforfood as well as this forum. I'm told they don't match the ATP questions, but are very similar (not word for word).

Lighteningspeed 05-27-2010 04:07 AM


Originally Posted by johnso29 (Post 817322)
When NWA was running classes in 07/08 they did hold guys back at Mesaba because they needed to replace their empty Mesaba seat. However, these flow ups received a seniority # for the class they were originally awarded and just went to training later. That resulted in many being able to go straight to the 320, as many newhires held the 320 1 month into training and never had to go to the DC9 if they didn't want to.

I don't know if this resulted in less flow ups or not, just thought I'd share FWIW.

You are right. To clarify, only ones held back were LCAs or ones with medical issues. But they all, except the ones with medical issues (I think there were only 2 with med issues), received NWA seniority numbers and they all flowed up and benefitted by flowing up later since they did not have to go to DC9s.

I am sure Compass will be doing the same thing Mesaba did back in 2008.

This time around, for 2010 and 2011 hiring, I believe no Mesaba pilot wil be held back unless they are management pilots. Mesaba is limited to only 9 per month anyway so that only makes 45 for 2010 and 108 for 2011 assuming DAL hiring continues all of 2011. So I think even with hold back policy, Compass has a much better flowthru agreement, hands down.

shadyops 05-27-2010 06:19 AM


Originally Posted by Oberon (Post 817083)
Compass Pilots,

Before you post please consider the ramifications your words may have for flow-ups at Delta. There is no reason to engage someone looking to start a fight on Flightinfo. You will not change his mind but you may inadvertently influence someone who hasn't formed an opinion of Compass.

I considered the ramifications for this instance and they are nil. No one who matters listens to this fellow which is why he is on APC. My postings on this website won't affect the collective opinion of a group of 12,000 pilots. He has obviously formed an opinion already. I posted facts with a bit of frustration, but they are still facts while Captain Heartburn has no legitimate base for his unfounded opinions. He is looking to point the finger at anything or anyone other than himself and those he is loyal to. Maybe he should worry about the opinions of those flowing up. The majority of Delta pilots know what the reality is. Captain Heartburn is singled out here.

Lighteningspeed 05-27-2010 09:23 AM


Originally Posted by bored (Post 817809)
Lighteningspeed -

I'll take our (XJ) flowthru over the CP one any day of the week. While we might only get to flow 9, we also don't have a flushback. Also, with a sustainable number like 9, it will facilitate a smooth operation at Mesaba while people flow. 20/mo from an airline with only 400 pilots is going to create havok and it will affect everyone on the list. 9/mo IMO is a small price to pay for keeping the rest of us not flowing from having rampant jr assigns, being abused on reserve, canceled vacations and all the other delights of a short staffed airline, all of which we have not experienced at Mesaba in the last 3 years. Plus, the number 9 can always be increased through negotiation.

Good point, Bored. I haven't thought about those pesky issues since we haven't had to deal with them in the last few years, as you've indicated. I guess if DAL continues hire and they need more than 600 pilots in 2011, Mesaba can always negotiate for more than 9 per month to flowthru.

Splash 05-27-2010 12:06 PM


Originally Posted by contrails (Post 814764)
Incorrect.

All that are senior enough to flow meet all of the requirements. In fact even the second bracket of 100 pilots probably all meets them too.

You are incorrect. Re-read the contract and LOAs. Pay particular attention to the requirement for 30 months. Then scan down the list and identify the pilots who don't have it - but are senior enough to flow.

See any who have been out on maternity leave for several months?

Question me at your peril.

yb23 05-27-2010 02:15 PM


Originally Posted by Lighteningspeed (Post 817697)
You are right. To clarify, only ones held back were LCAs or ones with medical issues. But they all, except the ones with medical issues (I think there were only 2 with med issues), received NWA seniority numbers and they all flowed up and benefitted by flowing up later since they did not have to go to DC9s.

What kind of medical issues would stop them from flowing, do you know? It seems like if they could hold a 1st class medical they should be allowed to flow...right?

contrails 05-27-2010 05:15 PM


Originally Posted by Splash (Post 817906)
You are incorrect. Re-read the contract and LOAs. Pay particular attention to the requirement for 30 months. Then scan down the list and identify the pilots who don't have it - but are senior enough to flow.

See any who have been out on maternity leave for several months?

Question me at your peril.

You are really nitpicking here.

Pilot #100 is past 30 months. Everyone more senior to that can hold captain.

So, I guess you are referring to probably half a dozen people out of the first 100 that are on maternity leave, full-time military leave, medical leave, etc. That is not really what we have all been discussing on here, but okay, 95 out of the top 100 can flow, not all 100.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:55 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands