Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Corporate
Corporate vs airline / starting at age 50 >

Corporate vs airline / starting at age 50

Search
Notices
Corporate Corporate operators

Corporate vs airline / starting at age 50

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-17-2017, 10:35 PM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 945
Default

Originally Posted by MarineFAC View Post

I don't mean to sound snarky
You didn't.

Toolish? Yeah.

But not snarky
Mink is offline  
Old 03-17-2017, 11:08 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
pokey9554's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Position: Cessna 150
Posts: 655
Default

Originally Posted by Mink View Post
You didn't.

Toolish? Yeah.

But not snarky
I disagree. His/her post was riddled with situations that seem common in corporate aviation.
pokey9554 is offline  
Old 03-18-2017, 06:42 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RI830's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: Left seat on a kite
Posts: 1,884
Default

The grass is greener where you water it!!!
RI830 is offline  
Old 03-18-2017, 07:58 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
galaxy flyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: Baja Vermont
Posts: 5,177
Default

I never doubted that legacy jobs offered better pay and benefits, with the revenue stream and the strength of unions it couldn't be otherwise. Just about every other flying job will be ancillary to the primary focus of the business.

There are 12,000 bizjets active in the US meaning somewhere north of 24,000 pilots there. There is a retirement gulch here, too, and pilots will wind up there. Spoiler Alert! It isn't guaranteed for anyone to get hired into one of the those legacy jobs that work ten days for 200K--check the forums for regional CAs with nary a call for interview. I've been in this biz for 45 years and seen loads of great guys wind up in corporates, military technicians or out of the cockpit. I know guys with closets full of uniforms from past airlines still flying corporate, fractional jobs. I've recently seen guys walk off active duty into legacy jobs while others wait the call. It isn't guaranteed.

Back in the late '90s, I was a SQ/DO (XO, mil tech) watching guys leave the Reserves in a year because, "nothing can go wrong, hiring will go one forever, don't need the reserves and the retirement isn't worth the effort". Well, those guys were furloughed for years in many cases. When showed the UA 2000 contract, I was amazed at the terms (I was a former EAL MEC), well, the next quarter or two were full of red ink.

Anyone who is smug in the flying business is headed for a fall.

GF
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 03-18-2017, 09:45 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Posts: 945
Default

Originally Posted by pokey9554 View Post
I disagree. His/her post was riddled with situations that seem common in corporate aviation.
No argument with the points being made.

The bedside manner struck me as needing some work.

Good luck to all of you.
Mink is offline  
Old 03-18-2017, 12:41 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
galaxy flyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: Baja Vermont
Posts: 5,177
Default

Originally Posted by pokey9554 View Post
I disagree. His/her post was riddled with situations that seem common in corporate aviation.
Yes and no! A C-5 crew's bag drag was far worse than shuffling a half dozen bags around a Global's baggage compartment. It's not like anyone who expects pilots to load a B737. I never hand wrote an international flight on a Global or Challenger, as I did hundreds of times in the USAF. The rental car or limo always came out to the ramp in my corporate operation. We flew biz class mostly, I have 1.5 million Marriott points to vacation on and FF miles to fly with. I always had 12 hours or whatever was the planned crew rest. the schedule was flown as planned, if we were scheduled for 3 days off, that was 99.9% true and any change still required 12 hours prior notice. Good corporate ops are more and more common; bad ones exist because the Chief Pilot didn't know how to manage the pilots or how to "manage" the boss. Yes, I was one for years.

I was far more fatigued my first six months at Eastern than ever at a corporate. Used to was, reserve was a 24-hour a day deal. I got called at 2:30am one night to show for a 6am departure and I was 2:15 drive away. Thankfully that nonsense is gone.

GF

PS: Lears are notoriously crappy operations--usually owned by guys who struck it rich and thought they were suddenly Trump. Ego-fueled dumbkopfs
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 03-20-2017, 06:38 PM
  #27  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Feb 2017
Posts: 1
Default

I'm in the same but different category. 1.5 yrs or so from mil retirement will be 42 and on the fence. Really enjoy the unique flying of the corporate world (I have BD-700, GV experience) but know I have to find the right flight department that fits. Schedule flexibility or predictability is going to be a factor for me. Airlines appear to offer that but I hear stories and meet folks on the road that have different situations. Of course pay is a factor with multiple kids hitting college but that's why I work multiple jobs.

Any advice is greatly appreciated.
Cookie is offline  
Old 03-27-2017, 12:24 AM
  #28  
done, gone skiing
 
dckozak's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2005
Position: Rocking chair
Posts: 1,601
Default

The OP mentioned NAI as the major or a corporate gig. The response after that post shows that most responders either failed to see this or (I seriously doubt) equate NAI with a major.
My take; if you can land a real major (DAL, AA, UA, HA, SWA, AK, FDX, or UPS), than take it. If it is anyone less, than you really need to balance the quality of the corporation/flight department and decide from there. If you haven't interviewed yet, than be sure to ask basic questions (for sure of the corporate gig) about QOL issues, time off, call out expectations, future pay after initial first year expectations, etc. With any airline, use this forum and dig out opinion from past posts.
dckozak is offline  
Old 03-27-2017, 03:38 AM
  #29  
Furloughed Again?!
 
ZapBrannigan's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: Boeing 737
Posts: 4,796
Default

Originally Posted by galaxy flyer View Post
Lears are notoriously crappy operations--usually owned by guys who struck it rich and thought they were suddenly Trump. Ego-fueled dumbkopfs

Or the Fortune #1 company that operates a fleet of 15-20 Learjet 40 and 45s with 60+ pilots...


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
ZapBrannigan is offline  
Old 03-27-2017, 06:46 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
galaxy flyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: Baja Vermont
Posts: 5,177
Default

There is that, Zap.. But, an exception, I think, maybe I've been acquainted with, but not worked for, the type in my mind.

GF
galaxy flyer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
eFDeeeX
Cargo
59
01-31-2008 01:30 PM
Brown
Major
115
12-27-2007 07:47 AM
BIGBROWNDC8
Cargo
7
10-22-2007 03:33 PM
Andy
Major
25
11-20-2006 07:13 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices