Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Corporate
Phenom 100 300 takeoff landing dist >

Phenom 100 300 takeoff landing dist

Notices
Corporate Corporate operators

Phenom 100 300 takeoff landing dist

Old 04-16-2018, 06:08 AM
  #71  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2017
Posts: 55
Default

Originally Posted by Kimo View Post
I don't need you calling my company and interfering with my duties as a flight crew member. If I have the numbers and data for whatever my mission may be then your interference is not appropriate.
Aren't your duties as a flight crew member to make sure the aircraft is operated in a safe, responsible, legal manner? As basic as 91.103b "For any flight, runway lengths at airports of intended use". I'm not an expert on phenoms but when 10+ people are all saying the same thing, its usually wise to hear them out...
COKS is offline  
Old 04-16-2018, 06:20 AM
  #72  
Pilot
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Position: Large cabin Bizjet
Posts: 448
Default

I think we've been very successfully trolled.
HwkrPlt is offline  
Old 04-16-2018, 10:11 AM
  #73  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Position: Small and slow
Posts: 64
Default

Originally Posted by COKS View Post
Aren't your duties as a flight crew member to make sure the aircraft is operated in a safe, responsible, legal manner? As basic as 91.103b "For any flight, runway lengths at airports of intended use". I'm not an expert on phenoms but when 10+ people are all saying the same thing, its usually wise to hear them out...
That's what's inferred by saying "I have the numbers and data"
Example. I have the numbers and data to support an 8000ft takeoff on the 10,000ft runway you guys like to use. I'm legal but you're still not legal by calling my company and interfering with my duties as a flight crewmember.
Kimo is offline  
Old 04-16-2018, 10:27 AM
  #74  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2017
Posts: 55
Default

Originally Posted by Kimo View Post
That's what's inferred by saying "I have the numbers and data"
Example. I have the numbers and data to support an 8000ft takeoff on the 10,000ft runway you guys like to use. I'm legal but you're still not legal by calling my company and interfering with my duties as a flight crewmember.
There is actually nothing illegal about calling a company to report gross negligence, which is none of us intend to do in your case, and running off a runway on takeoff or having below legal fuel will interfere with your duties as a crew member far more than any of us on this thread will.
COKS is offline  
Old 04-16-2018, 12:00 PM
  #75  
Gets Weekends Off
 
galaxy flyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: Baja Vermont
Posts: 5,168
Default

If you have the “numbers”; why so defensive? You’d easily withstand an audit, correct? You’re BS’ing somewhere—either the numbers aren’t there, the runway isn’t 2,500’ or you don’t know what you’re talking about.

I’ve been around enough to see operators do all sorts of marginally legal things. One told me we use this 60’ wide runway all the time. To which I asked, what’s your explanation for a sideline excursion and went thru FAR 25 and the FAA AC on runway design. Another wanted to operate off a sealed coral strip. I asked about the PCN. Blank stare. I asked the maintenance chief how many tires they used. It was about twice the expected rate and some nasty cuts. How will explain a blown tire at V1? “Won’t happen”. Oh.

GF
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 04-16-2018, 02:30 PM
  #76  
whatever
 
Vital Signs's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 421
Default

The requirement to get from Legal to Safe is Common Sense.
Vital Signs is offline  
Old 04-16-2018, 03:15 PM
  #77  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Position: Small and slow
Posts: 64
Default

Nah I'm almost certain I was trolled on this one.

Thanks again to those that contributed!
Kimo is offline  
Old 04-17-2018, 07:29 AM
  #78  
Number Last
 
PowderFinger's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Position: Boeing voice activated systems and ACARS commander
Posts: 442
Default

Originally Posted by Kimo View Post
Nah I'm almost certain I was trolled on this one.

Thanks again to those that contributed!
I think he proved again that you can't fix stupid.
PowderFinger is offline  
Old 04-17-2018, 10:24 AM
  #79  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2016
Posts: 182
Default

Trolled. This is a 13 year old with a really cool flight sim setup in his room. I believe he works here: http://www.californiaair.net/
I met one of these guys once hanging out in the lobby at Atlantic San Jose. I couldn’t believe how real it was to him.

Last edited by Falcondrivr; 04-17-2018 at 10:34 AM.
Falcondrivr is offline  
Old 04-17-2018, 05:19 PM
  #80  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JulesWinfield's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,225
Default

Originally Posted by inverted25 View Post
This is a either a troll or retard. If your worried about water and one engine get a twin otter or king air. If your not a troll please post the operator your doing the research for id love to chat with them about this thread.
Not even sure a King Air 90 could make this work.
JulesWinfield is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Skylane93S
Corporate
2
02-05-2016 09:36 AM
Flyboy8784
Part 135
26
03-25-2014 11:13 AM
thecfi32
Part 91 and Low Time
11
05-05-2012 10:56 AM
beebopbogo
Aviation Law
28
08-25-2009 05:06 PM
SPDBOILER
Fractional
2
03-12-2008 09:38 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices