Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Corporate
Phenom 100 300 takeoff landing dist >

Phenom 100 300 takeoff landing dist

Search
Notices
Corporate Corporate operators

Phenom 100 300 takeoff landing dist

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-18-2018, 04:07 AM
  #81  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Posts: 18
Default

At the risk of keeping this crazy thread going (why oh why!), even the new Pilatus PC-24 that advertises amazingly short requirements uses a balanced field length of 2,810 ft. I've never even seen it other than mockup, but the numbers are really quite interesting.

That being said, planning on operations out of a 2,500 foot strip with any regularity in something other than a Twin Otter is just plain nuts!
Xems is offline  
Old 04-18-2018, 11:13 AM
  #82  
Gets Weekends Off
 
twebb's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: CE-650
Posts: 397
Default

Some of these new jets are amazing at what they can do. But short runways and reliable says Pc12.

Troll or not, pilots make these decisions everyday.....wet or contaminated runway? Was that only 1/8" dry compacted snow or slush? At the end of the day, it comes down to gut feeling. Was I on and on? Speed Vref per POH? Do I know this awos is always under or over-reporting conditions?

The pilots that know their limitations, the airplanes limitations, and the fields limitations are the ones that can post on here another day.
twebb is offline  
Old 04-18-2018, 01:03 PM
  #83  
Gets Weekends Off
 
TroutBum's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Position: E175 FO
Posts: 104
Default

Originally Posted by HwkrPlt View Post
I think we've been very successfully trolled.
I think you are correct. This is right up there with the infamous "Mall Ninja" thread on GlockTalk. https://lonelymachines.org/mall-ninjas/
TroutBum is offline  
Old 05-30-2018, 09:04 PM
  #84  
Line Holder
 
Stickshaker's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2009
Position: Lefty
Posts: 53
Default

I just read this whole thread and found it pretty amusing. Hopefully the OP got what he was looking for.

For any "future" users who are considering the performance of a Phenom, I can offer my .02 and beat the hell out of this dead horse:

When I run the numbers on the Phenom 100 with 4 x 180 pax, 50 pounds baggage and 2-pilot crew departing with 800 pounds and landing with 600 pounds (minimum in the 100), sea-level, 20C, 29.92:
DRY RUNWAY:
TAKEOFF FLAPS 1, MIN REQUIRED RUNWAY LENGTH = 2,861 FT, V1=94, VR=99, V2=104, VFS=121 CLIMB LIMITED WEIGHT: 10,582 LBS, AIRCRAFT WEIGHT: 8,966LBS.

LANDING FLAPS FULL, VREF=95, VAC=101, VFS=119, MAX WEIGHT: 10,507 LBS, LANDING WEIGHT = 8,766 LBS, UNFACTORED LANDING DISTANCE = 2,536 FT.

WET RUNWAY:
MIN REQUIRED RUNWAY LENGTH (TAKEOFF) = 5,068 FT
FACTORED LANDING DISTANCE = 4,983 FT

Will the airplane do it? Probably. When it's bone dry. But I've only got 1,100 hours in the Phenom (single-pilot) and I wouldn't. When you start discounting the engineering margins in the book, you're already cooked.
Stickshaker is offline  
Old 07-13-2018, 08:02 PM
  #85  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Position: Fractional Captain
Posts: 6
Default

2 words: Twin Otter
Shoeless is offline  
Old 07-17-2018, 08:49 AM
  #86  
Pilot
 
Joined APC: Dec 2014
Position: Large cabin Bizjet
Posts: 448
Default

Originally Posted by TroutBum View Post
I think you are correct. This is right up there with the infamous "Mall Ninja" thread on GlockTalk. https://lonelymachines.org/mall-ninjas/
Glocktalk....boy there is a blast from the past. I wonder if my login still works.
HwkrPlt is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Skylane93S
Corporate
2
02-05-2016 09:36 AM
Flyboy8784
Part 135
26
03-25-2014 11:13 AM
thecfi32
Part 91 and Low Time
11
05-05-2012 10:56 AM
beebopbogo
Aviation Law
28
08-25-2009 05:06 PM
SPDBOILER
Fractional
2
03-12-2008 09:38 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices