Search
Notices
Corporate Corporate operators

Need advice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-22-2019, 07:00 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
galaxy flyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2010
Position: Baja Vermont
Posts: 5,176
Default

They can also save you the management fees in savings every trip. Yes, in theory, you can it alone IF you have the right Director with the right experience. They’re hard to come by these days.


GF
galaxy flyer is offline  
Old 02-22-2019, 07:02 AM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RI830's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: Left seat on a kite
Posts: 1,884
Default

Originally Posted by Dhood84 View Post
Don’t settle for a smaller plane when there are plenty of options for super mids with the capability of your mission. The 604 is a great bird but gets “sluggish” up high and heavy, but the space is fantastic for all parties, pilots included. It will cross the pond with ease and won’t “break” the bank. I’m trying to get my boss into a bigger plane (currently a Phenom 300) since he wants to do Europe (doable with stops) and Hawaii (obviously not) in the future. We are looking at a Legacy 450/550 as that fills the need. Go with EJM or one of the big management companies, it will make your life and the principals life a lot easier.

DH
Find a lightly used Legacy 600. Drastically lower price than the Legacy 450/500 and much larger cabin. Should be plenty on the used market for less than 10M
RI830 is offline  
Old 02-22-2019, 07:25 AM
  #23  
Chief A'Hole
 
Dhood84's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Aug 2015
Position: Barely Flying!
Posts: 402
Default

We don’t have the hangar space for a 600. It would be nice as I have the type already, but never gonna happen on that bird.

DH
Dhood84 is offline  
Old 02-26-2019, 06:37 AM
  #24  
New Hire
 
Joined APC: Feb 2015
Posts: 2
Default Recommendation

Hello,

East Coast Flight Services could provide and give advice on your
aircraft needs or provide management services.

eastcoastflight.com
phone: 800-554-0550
gwilliams is offline  
Old 02-26-2019, 09:06 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 131
Default

You are about to have a big learning curve. Not trying to scare you. But there isn't any such thing as dipping your toes in the water and going full on international ops.

Best open the wallet and call EJM or someone similar that is operating a lot of jets internationally. They are all gonna clean you out (money wise) but that is the price your gonna pay for an education.

If you try to go cheap and don't get extremely lucky and find the right guy it will cost way more in the end. And you will be extremely lucky to find the right guy.

Here is the best advice you will get on any forum. At this point you need to be paying someone for advice that knows the score that isn't looking for a job. Not asking around here.

Why you ask? You will get some really good advice here. You will also get some really bad advice here. How do you know what's what?
billsaw is offline  
Old 03-02-2019, 06:04 PM
  #26  
FO
 
Joined APC: Apr 2015
Position: B777
Posts: 175
Default

The acquisition cost of a Challenger 605 vs Challenger 300 is about the same but the 605 costs about $200.00 more per hour to operate.

The 605 can fly about 2 hours more than a 300 too. On longer trips, less landings = less risk exposure. Determine your mission requirements.

Challenger 300 cost is $4.00 per nautical mile
A Falcon 2000 is $5.35 per nautical mile FWIW....
Hawkerdriver1 is offline  
Old 03-03-2019, 07:30 AM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2017
Posts: 157
Default

"If you think it's expensive to hire Professionals, wait until you hire an amateur..."

Just the regulatory compliance alone is worth the cost of outsourcing.
Castle Bravo is offline  
Old 03-04-2019, 05:24 PM
  #28  
Speed, Power, Accuracy
 
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: PIC
Posts: 1,699
Default

Originally Posted by Castle Bravo View Post
"If you think it's expensive to hire Professionals, wait until you hire an amateur..."

Just the regulatory compliance alone is worth the cost of outsourcing.
In my opinion, this is an accurate statement.

My advice would be to use an established, well known management company to, pardon the pun, get you off the ground. After a year or two, if you have been lucky enough to find a great pilot with the right qualifications and experience to take your operation in-house, you can always do that. Trying it in-house straight away could get really expensive, really fast.

As far as equipment, I would recommend buying a little bit more than you THINK you need to get started. Challenger 300/350 is a good option. Falcon 2000 is a great airplane but needs TLC from a good mechanic. The break rate on the 2000 at NetJets has been stupid high.

When you are ready for an international airplane, I would absolutely look for a classic GV. Spend a million or three on a thorough inspection, cockpit upgrades, re-ragged interior, and fresh paint and you’ll be able to go virtually anywhere in the world (including full Stage IV noise compliance) one stop or non-stop at .85 Mach for a reasonable number, probably south of $18 million. Gulfstreams are expensive but they are WORTH IT.
GeeWizDriver is offline  
Old 03-11-2019, 08:02 PM
  #29  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by Castle Bravo View Post
"If you think it's expensive to hire Professionals, wait until you hire an amateur..."

Just the regulatory compliance alone is worth the cost of outsourcing.
Agree. Call EJM. I was a chief pilot for a legacy 600 there, I thought they were good. We did side charters but at 300-400 hours per year I would not do that.

Put it this way, they have a ton of connections because of net jets. We used to get the net jets fuel rate at FBOs. Talking to the sales guy had me convinced that if one wanted a jet, wanted it managed and wanted it to do charter it was the best option. They could get a jet rotating off net jets, fix it up, staff it and charter it out in the blink of an eye. They didn’t seem like they were trying to cheat the owners. Even when I got mad, and I got mad, I didn’t feel they were cheating.

I think a jet that’s in the netjets family type would be manage very well from budgeting, acquisition, staffing, training, maintenance, etc.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 04-28-2019, 05:12 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Frozen Ronin's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2005
Position: Still Swinging props!
Posts: 297
Default Transition

Kind of a cold thread, but had to throw out an idea I’ve seen work on multiple occasions; managed launch transitioning to in house team.

EJM won’t likely be interested, but several managing companies understand that if they don’t offer you a ‘buy out’ price, you’ll likely to hire folks from under them, anyhow. After a fixed contract length, the opportunity for you to buy the pilot/mx/manager is available. The price covers their cost of retraining and hiring a replacement for them, but gives you the incredible opportunity hire what you know works. If you offer the commensurate pay and QOL, and those prospects enjoy what they’re doing, it’s a cinch. If not, you have some work to do.

You now have some experience watching your flight department run for a year or two, have the in house experience you can trust, and after absorbing the buy out price, your department budget will trim back. You’ve basically bought your way through an expensive and intricate learning curve.
Frozen Ronin is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RickJohnson
PSA Airlines
35
03-05-2022 08:33 AM
aaronjmsb
Flight Schools and Training
20
01-29-2016 01:45 PM
manilo52
Career Questions
5
06-21-2015 04:05 PM
pilottim
Flight Schools and Training
6
05-05-2006 03:12 PM
calcapt
Major
29
05-01-2006 05:31 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices