Notices
Corporate Corporate operators

G550 or 7X?

Old 04-20-2015, 07:40 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
The dude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: DAL 737 FO
Posts: 295
Default G550 or 7X?

The boss is teetering between these two airplanes. I'm fairly familiar with both (specs, performance, etc.) but have flown neither. I'm particularly interested in opinions of those that have flown both and would appreciate any insight.

Thanks in advance.
The dude is offline  
Old 04-21-2015, 03:05 AM
  #2  
Gets Weekends Off
 
7Xdriver's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2010
Position: Captian, G450, G550 (Ret.)
Posts: 165
Default

Originally Posted by The dude View Post
The boss is teetering between these two airplanes. I'm fairly familiar with both (specs, performance, etc.) but have flown neither. I'm particularly interested in opinions of those that have flown both and would appreciate any insight.

Thanks in advance.
I loved the 7X when it wasn't broken (early serial number). Very efficient and flew like a sports car. Of course the dispatch reliability and lousy Dassault product support pushed us into replacing our Falcons with Gulfstreams.

First trip in the G550 was literally around the world. No issues but excellent Gulfstream support was in place (i mean showed up at the airplane) for each stop just in case. After 3 years our 2 G550s and G450 have been nearly flawless. Unlike the 7X, in the G550, if you get a CAS message, there is usually a work-around so you don't have to power down and then power up (we called it "re-init" on the 7X). If you do have a problem, there is a hotline you can call from the cockpit that connects you to a terrific support team who will work you through any problem. (yes they answer 24hrs a day).

G550 performance is pretty impressive compared to the 7X but it is at a price. It burns a lot more gas so be prepared for that. It is also has a bigger footprint so fitting it on a ramp/hangar when away or a home base hangar should be considered.

From the passenger standpoint, when we started flying the Gulfstreams we heard some passengers comment on how "cheap" the interior looked compared to the Falcons but we don't hear that any more. They are happy getting to their destination with no delays.

If Dassault released the 7X with bugs and expected their customers to be their test bed. They lost a lot of customers because of it. That said, I am sure the current 7X is a better product than it was and I only hope Dassault treats their customers better.

So to sum up, we are now a Gulfstream customer and are happy with that

Kevin
7Xdriver is offline  
Old 04-21-2015, 11:04 AM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RI830's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: Left seat on a kite
Posts: 1,884
Default

I don't know anyone who has gone from Gulfstream to the 7X.....but I know a few who dumped their 7x's for Globals or Gulftreams.

The boys in Savannah charge a pretty penny, but you are getting one heck of a bird for your money and top tier support.
RI830 is offline  
Old 04-21-2015, 09:13 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
The dude's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: DAL 737 FO
Posts: 295
Default

Originally Posted by 7Xdriver View Post
I loved the 7X when it wasn't broken (early serial number). Very efficient and flew like a sports car. Of course the dispatch reliability and lousy Dassault product support pushed us into replacing our Falcons with Gulfstreams.

First trip in the G550 was literally around the world. No issues but excellent Gulfstream support was in place (i mean showed up at the airplane) for each stop just in case. After 3 years our 2 G550s and G450 have been nearly flawless. Unlike the 7X, in the G550, if you get a CAS message, there is usually a work-around so you don't have to power down and then power up (we called it "re-init" on the 7X). If you do have a problem, there is a hotline you can call from the cockpit that connects you to a terrific support team who will work you through any problem. (yes they answer 24hrs a day).

G550 performance is pretty impressive compared to the 7X but it is at a price. It burns a lot more gas so be prepared for that. It is also has a bigger footprint so fitting it on a ramp/hangar when away or a home base hangar should be considered.

From the passenger standpoint, when we started flying the Gulfstreams we heard some passengers comment on how "cheap" the interior looked compared to the Falcons but we don't hear that any more. They are happy getting to their destination with no delays.

If Dassault released the 7X with bugs and expected their customers to be their test bed. They lost a lot of customers because of it. That said, I am sure the current 7X is a better product than it was and I only hope Dassault treats their customers better.

So to sum up, we are now a Gulfstream customer and are happy with that

Kevin
That's exactly what I was after. Thanks a million for the info, Kevin.
The dude is offline  
Old 04-22-2015, 11:44 AM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
cruiseclimb's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Various
Posts: 462
Default

The other Falcon products I've flown (900s), were fantastic machines. Very efficient with fuel and maintenance.. but that isn't exactly your question...
cruiseclimb is offline  
Old 04-24-2015, 05:14 PM
  #6  
You scratched my anchor
 
Al Czervik's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 4,872
Default

"GV customers thought the cabin looked cheap."

Wow, wish I had those kind of complaints.
Al Czervik is offline  
Old 04-25-2015, 06:39 AM
  #7  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: A CL F Left Right and Center
Posts: 66
Default

Contact FlyMD on "that other" forum. He flies, or used to fly, both I think.

CP
captainprop is offline  
Old 05-07-2015, 02:59 PM
  #8  
Clean side up
 
Captain Quint's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jul 2012
Position: Forked tail doctor killer, lawyers too.
Posts: 60
Default

I fly the 5. No other way to say it, it does anything you ask of it. Short fields, long flights no problem. 3 words sum it up, performance, performance, performance. At full gross weight takeoff it's guaranteed to be able reach an initial cruise altitude of FL410 (about 30 minutes). The price? Three words, fuel, fuel, fuel.
The fabled Gulfstream support is just that, a fable. Maybe if your airplane is under warranty you can get the service everyone raves about. 10+ year old airplane? Forget it.
Gulfstream does give operators tons of info and resources for pilots I have not seen offered by other manufacturers before.
Captain Quint is offline  
Old 05-30-2015, 09:21 AM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Rainbows's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: Low paid Airbus gear slinger
Posts: 815
Default

Originally Posted by RI830 View Post
I don't know anyone who has gone from Gulfstream to the 7X.....but I know a few who dumped their 7x's for Globals or Gulftreams.

The boys in Savannah charge a pretty penny, but you are getting one heck of a bird for your money and top tier support.
This exactly. I haven't flown the 7X, but you can't go wrong with the Gulfstream.
Rainbows is offline  
Old 06-03-2015, 05:01 PM
  #10  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jun 2014
Position: Deployed Reservist
Posts: 77
Default

Anybody know anyone flying for Creflo Dollar Ministries? Isn't a Falcon trijet a better deal for intercontinental if it has lower fuel costs, a third engine for safety, AND a lower purchase price? You can get a like new one for half the price of a G650. Sure Titanic was a little faster and had white glove service, but in the end, all that guilding and butt wiping wasn't of any advantage to the customer.
Learjet FO is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
f10a
Corporate
29
01-03-2013 05:14 PM
FlywithStyle
Fractional
42
02-25-2010 01:09 AM
AAflyer
Fractional
5
03-04-2008 05:30 AM
tnrrfr
Corporate
1
12-18-2007 07:59 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices