They found a cure....4 months ago
#21
Banned
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 627
Typical strawman. I don’t care if Tiger Woods said this or other weird things, the man has 81 PGA tour wins regardless.
She isn’t saying “I think x, so y”. If she was making a hypothesis, then sure, call her credentials and past oddities in. But she stated a fact.
She said, 100% of her patients lives and she treated them with hQC+zinc+zmax. If you want to discredit her, find those stats are wrong. I’m sure there are plenty of people she works with, someone would have to call her out if she was wrong. 100% is a pretty good success rate, regardless of your personal beliefs. Prove that statement wrong.
She isn’t saying “I think x, so y”. If she was making a hypothesis, then sure, call her credentials and past oddities in. But she stated a fact.
She said, 100% of her patients lives and she treated them with hQC+zinc+zmax. If you want to discredit her, find those stats are wrong. I’m sure there are plenty of people she works with, someone would have to call her out if she was wrong. 100% is a pretty good success rate, regardless of your personal beliefs. Prove that statement wrong.
https://medcitynews.com/2020/07/hydr...rate-covid-19/
The only reason it keeps popping up is because it's a political wedge issue for the intellectually challenged.
The 100% cured claim means nothing -- her credibility is shot because she's a quack.
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Posts: 205
They found a cure....4 months ago
Hydroxychloroquine has already been debunked as ineffective.
https://medcitynews.com/2020/07/hydr...rate-covid-19/
The only reason it keeps popping up is because it's a political wedge issue for the intellectually challenged.
The 100% cured claim means nothing because her credibility is shot because she's a quack.
https://medcitynews.com/2020/07/hydr...rate-covid-19/
The only reason it keeps popping up is because it's a political wedge issue for the intellectually challenged.
The 100% cured claim means nothing because her credibility is shot because she's a quack.
I know it has been debunked...by itself. Has that cocktail been debunked?
Has her patient survival rate been debunked?
You can believe the sky is green and the earth is flat, but if your treatments cure me, I’ll gladly call you my doctor, ‘debunked’ cure or not.
Maybe a reason it keeps popping up is because so many doctors are using it? Maybe that is why the death rate is plummeting?
#23
Typical strawman. I don’t care if Tiger Woods said this or other weird things, the man has 81 PGA tour wins regardless.
She isn’t saying “I think x, so y”. If she was making a hypothesis, then sure, call her credentials and past oddities in. But she stated a fact.
She said, 100% of her patients lives and she treated them with hQC+zinc+zmax. If you want to discredit her, find those stats are wrong. I’m sure there are plenty of people she works with, someone would have to call her out if she was wrong. 100% is a pretty good success rate, regardless of your personal beliefs. Prove that statement wrong.
She isn’t saying “I think x, so y”. If she was making a hypothesis, then sure, call her credentials and past oddities in. But she stated a fact.
She said, 100% of her patients lives and she treated them with hQC+zinc+zmax. If you want to discredit her, find those stats are wrong. I’m sure there are plenty of people she works with, someone would have to call her out if she was wrong. 100% is a pretty good success rate, regardless of your personal beliefs. Prove that statement wrong.
Yet somehow, you think the burden is on us to prove this quack is wrong.
This is why conspiracy theories thrive, and why political astroturfing is a thing.
#cultureofignorance
#24
Banned
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 627
Otherwise, Dr. Demonsperm doesn't have any legitimacy.
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Posts: 205
They found a cure....4 months ago
You don’t need a study. A study is to prove a hypothesis wrong. I am saying surely someone out there could easily prove her STATEMENT is wrong. No study needed.
40+ news organizations jumped down her throat, and all of them bash her crazy talk, and say FDA proved HQC debunked. Not one says that statement was wrong.
#26
Banned
Joined APC: Apr 2017
Posts: 627
You don’t need a study. A study is to prove a hypothesis wrong. I am saying surely someone out there could easily prove her STATEMENT is wrong. No study needed.
40+ news organizations jumped down her throat, and all of them bash her crazy talk, and say FDA proved HQC debunked. Not one says that statement was wrong.
40+ news organizations jumped down her throat, and all of them bash her crazy talk, and say FDA proved HQC debunked. Not one says that statement was wrong.
As to why no one researches the validity of her statements, it would be a long and laborious process to track down each of her patients and get them to reveal their medical histories. And do all this to disprove an already proven crazy person.
To put it simply:
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
Oh, you simply don’t understand how science is done. I have a rock that provides the bearer with tiger attack protection with a 100% success rate. Care to buy it?
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: retired 767(dl)
Posts: 5,719
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post