Nature Article on the Effectiveness of Masks
10-13-2020, 04:25 AM
#31
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2019
Posts: 1,538
Originally Posted by JamesNoBrakes
I posted a chart earlier in the thread showing millions of years of ice core data illustrating that CO2 lags temperature and is not responsible for temperature. Are the scientists that produced that chart any less qualified with the scientists that suggest the opposite? The thing about science is that it can never be settled. Science is observation and hypothesis. There will always be opposing views and the views that do not comport with the goals of powerful people and drive huge profits will always be discounted by the side collecting the checks.
10-13-2020, 04:54 AM
#32
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Position: Pilot
Posts: 516
Sweden’s economy has done significantly better and more scientists are opposing lockdowns.
https://www.nationalreview.com/corne...down-news/amp/
https://www.nationalreview.com/corne...down-news/amp/
10-13-2020, 04:55 AM
#33
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Originally Posted by AntiPeter
Sweden’s economy has done significantly better and more scientists are opposing lockdowns.
https://www.nationalreview.com/corne...down-news/amp/
https://www.nationalreview.com/corne...down-news/amp/
10-13-2020, 05:21 AM
#35
Custom User Title
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,270
Originally Posted by BobZ
If someone predicts the score after the game is played.....can we really call them a scientist? 😆
Originally Posted by Seneca Pilot
Only thing is, Sweden predicted the score early in the first quarter.
10-13-2020, 05:52 AM
#36
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Ya....thats kinda what im thinking. Its not a threat....its the end of the world. No masks....everbody mask....lock everybody down until it goes away....lockdowns are only for short term.
Seems a lot of the scientific experts in public health policy are conflicted on their science.
Now the bio/pharma research people?....seems they have their stuff all in one sock.
Seems a lot of the scientific experts in public health policy are conflicted on their science.
Now the bio/pharma research people?....seems they have their stuff all in one sock.
10-13-2020, 12:52 PM
#37
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2011
Position: Under beer over couch after skool
Posts: 316
Originally Posted by AntiPeter
It will be fascinating when the results from the clinical trials of the vaccines come out, how society will respond and what (if anything) will change.
I was out walking some nature trails yesterday and I'm still very surprised how many people (usually healthy women, it would seem) wear masks outside. Seeing that they are the lowest risk group from COVID-19, and their risk is almost nil, especially outside, I wonder how long it will take for a more rational, scientific and objective response from those that have become hypochondriacs.
I was out walking some nature trails yesterday and I'm still very surprised how many people (usually healthy women, it would seem) wear masks outside. Seeing that they are the lowest risk group from COVID-19, and their risk is almost nil, especially outside, I wonder how long it will take for a more rational, scientific and objective response from those that have become hypochondriacs.
But I cover my face when I cough or sneeze and have been doing so for 35+ years. That includes the time after AP Bio when I learned viruses, bacteria, and most microorganisms are smaller than the pores in my shirt or (worse) gap between my fingers.
Last edited by Ronaldo; 10-13-2020 at 01:04 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
