A COVID-19 vaccine could be a lifeline...
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2012
Position: 1900D CA
Posts: 3,394
#23
Alas, that's a big if. Lots of scaremongering on all sides of the aisle "I won't take it if party X is recommending it" . The individual "smart" play is to let others take it to establish herd immunity but not get it for yourself. Too many people do this, and it doesn't work, obviously.
Also reading that it's a two sequence vaccine, and a higher percentage than normal of people will be getting high fever, muscle aches, and other flu-like symptoms that will last a couple of days.* The concern is that many people who get the first shot will find the experience so unpleasant they won't take the second one.
Unless social media clamps down [hard] on anecdotal stories about people complaining on the immediate effects of the vaccine, the 10% of symptom suffers stand a chance of scaring the other 90% so much they won't take it. Alternately, some kind of universal "vaccination pass" for free movement/employment, which brings up all kinds of privacy issues.
There's light at the end of the tunnel, but I don't thing we're out of the woods yet. Predict 2022 before things start getting back to normal.
*(this happens to me every year I get a vanilla flu shot; my first shingles vaccine shot sent me to the minute clinic with a sustained 104+ fever, and I'm dreading the booster shot in 2 months)
#24
Alas, that's a big if. Lots of scaremongering on all sides of the aisle "I won't take it if party X is recommending it" . The individual "smart" play is to let others take it to establish herd immunity but not get it for yourself. Too many people do this, and it doesn't work, obviously.
Also reading that it's a two sequence vaccine, and a higher percentage than normal of people will be getting high fever, muscle aches, and other flu-like symptoms that will last a couple of days.* The concern is that many people who get the first shot will find the experience so unpleasant they won't take the second one.
Unless social media clamps down [hard] on anecdotal stories about people complaining on the immediate effects of the vaccine, the 10% of symptom suffers stand a chance of scaring the other 90% so much they won't take it.
Also reading that it's a two sequence vaccine, and a higher percentage than normal of people will be getting high fever, muscle aches, and other flu-like symptoms that will last a couple of days.* The concern is that many people who get the first shot will find the experience so unpleasant they won't take the second one.
Unless social media clamps down [hard] on anecdotal stories about people complaining on the immediate effects of the vaccine, the 10% of symptom suffers stand a chance of scaring the other 90% so much they won't take it.
Also while some governors talked about banning federally-approved vaccines for what is obviously blatant political purposes, I think the election has removed their incentive to do that. Especially once they realize that they need a functioning economy in order to tax anybody.
Qantas and other international airlines are already talking about it...
Qantas Expects to Require Vaccine for PAX
My Aunt had shingles, it's worth the vaccine (and the booster) to not go through that. My first shot was mild, booster in two months, see how that goes. My Dad says his booster was a non-event, so hopefully I inherited whatever gene did that for him.
#25
I think after the initial flurry of vaccines together with those who have already gotten it.. The politicization of it will be over and will be back to normal. a virus with 99.97% survival rates will be hard pressed to keep front and center news. Spelling the end of this fiasco.
#27
I have heard the spread factor for COVID-19 is about 2.5 with no protection. (As an example, if it is 2.0, the first generation is 2, the next is 2x2 = 4, then 4x2=8, and 8x2=16 people infected. So on.)
If, by vaccine and immunity by exposure, it was 0.5, as an example, here is what happens. 1 x 0.5 = 0.5, the second generation is 0.5x0.5 = 0.25 cases, then 0.25x0.5 = 0.125 cases for every 1 in the first generation. Rapidly it goes away.
For reference, Measles has a spread factor of 5.
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2015
Posts: 180
What you fail to understand is that rampant, widespread disease will kill our industry. See the past six months
#29
A non-inoculable disease will kill our industry, but longer term (10-20 years) I'm not so certain it's a viable industry anyway. At least in Western countries. I certainly wouldn't choose a non-military pilot career path if I were 20 right now, that's for sure.
Hoping for these to vaccines pan out, however, and quickly.
#30
Banned
Joined APC: Feb 2020
Position: Gummed
Posts: 1,060
Most people need to have a basic statistics course in propagation. If the average person infects more than one, the population sick grows. If the average person infects less than one, the population sick dwindles to extinction of the disease.
I have heard the spread factor for COVID-19 is about 2.5 with no protection. (As an example, if it is 2.0, the first generation is 2, the next is 2x2 = 4, then 4x2=8, and 8x2=16 people infected. So on.)
If, by vaccine and immunity by exposure, it was 0.5, as an example, here is what happens. 1 x 0.5 = 0.5, the second generation is 0.5x0.5 = 0.25 cases, then 0.25x0.5 = 0.125 cases for every 1 in the first generation. Rapidly it goes away.
For reference, Measles has a spread factor of 5.
I have heard the spread factor for COVID-19 is about 2.5 with no protection. (As an example, if it is 2.0, the first generation is 2, the next is 2x2 = 4, then 4x2=8, and 8x2=16 people infected. So on.)
If, by vaccine and immunity by exposure, it was 0.5, as an example, here is what happens. 1 x 0.5 = 0.5, the second generation is 0.5x0.5 = 0.25 cases, then 0.25x0.5 = 0.125 cases for every 1 in the first generation. Rapidly it goes away.
For reference, Measles has a spread factor of 5.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post