Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk > COVID19
International flying... >

International flying...

Search
Notices
COVID19 Pandemic Information and Reports

International flying...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-13-2021, 02:20 PM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,948
Default

Originally Posted by Xtreme87 View Post
You’re a closet communist. I can’t even muster a response to that besides what I said. Sick. Not to mention it’s unconstitutional, but who cares right? Communism doesn’t care about the constitution. For the record, you’re ok with the government swabbing your brain in order to freely return to your home country. Got it. Commie.
I’ve seen it all. Someone accusing Rickair of being a secret communist. This is the most delusional post you’ve made so far.
DarkSideMoon is offline  
Old 01-13-2021, 02:28 PM
  #52  
Gets Weekdays Off
 
skywatch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Economy Minus
Posts: 1,053
Default

Originally Posted by Tom Bradys Cat View Post
Back on the pcr stuff..... im sure the positives will outweigh the negatives. After all there has been significant industy lobbying to make this a thing.
A desperate industry looking for anything to get people to fly again, to be sure - but this is not it. The CDC does not recommend testing to end quarantine and says that you could continue to test positive on a PCR for up to three months after your infection - "Recovered persons can continue to shed detectable SARS-CoV-2 RNA in upper respiratory specimens for up to 3 months after illness onset, albeit at concentrations considerably lower than during illness, in ranges where replication-competent virus has not been reliably recovered and infectiousness is unlikely." "Thus, for persons recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection, a positive PCR without new symptoms during the 90 days after illness onset more likely represents persistent shedding of viral RNA than reinfection" https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019...isolation.html

Bottom line – “Probability of culturing virus declines to 8% in samples with Ct > 35 (NCBI.nih.gov) and to 6% 10 days after onset”. In the US, “Most tests set the limit at 40, a few at 37. This means that you are positive for the coronavirus if the test process required up to 40 cycles, or 37, to detect the virus.” (NYT and other sources)

So am I going to schedule a vacation and fly out of the country knowing that I could be sitting in Mexico unable to test negative for up to THREE MONTHS? And potentially putting my entire schedule/life dependent on a decreasingly accurate PCR test? All to detect if I have a shred of DNA of a virus that I am nowhere near contagious or sick from? Doubtful.
skywatch is offline  
Old 01-13-2021, 04:05 PM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 472
Default

Originally Posted by skywatch View Post
A desperate industry looking for anything to get people to fly again, to be sure - but this is not it. The CDC does not recommend testing to end quarantine and says that you could continue to test positive on a PCR for up to three months after your infection - "Recovered persons can continue to shed detectable SARS-CoV-2 RNA in upper respiratory specimens for up to 3 months after illness onset, albeit at concentrations considerably lower than during illness, in ranges where replication-competent virus has not been reliably recovered and infectiousness is unlikely." "Thus, for persons recovered from SARS-CoV-2 infection, a positive PCR without new symptoms during the 90 days after illness onset more likely represents persistent shedding of viral RNA than reinfection" https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019...isolation.html

Bottom line – “Probability of culturing virus declines to 8% in samples with Ct > 35 (NCBI.nih.gov) and to 6% 10 days after onset”. In the US, “Most tests set the limit at 40, a few at 37. This means that you are positive for the coronavirus if the test process required up to 40 cycles, or 37, to detect the virus.” (NYT and other sources)

So am I going to schedule a vacation and fly out of the country knowing that I could be sitting in Mexico unable to test negative for up to THREE MONTHS? And potentially putting my entire schedule/life dependent on a decreasingly accurate PCR test? All to detect if I have a shred of DNA of a virus that I am nowhere near contagious or sick from? Doubtful.

I get it, I get it....So why the industry lobbying? Seriously?
Tom Bradys Cat is offline  
Old 01-13-2021, 04:34 PM
  #54  
Clear ECAM
 
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 886
Default

Originally Posted by Tom Bradys Cat View Post
I get it, I get it....So why the industry lobbying? Seriously?
The folks at the top who get all the data apparently believe that these measures increase consumer confidence and will get many people to fly who otherwise would not. I completely agree that the efficacy of the policies is dubious, but at this point I don’t really care as long as it puts butts in seats.

At my place, the majority of international destinations already required a negative test to enter and our loads were pretty darn good for the flights we were doing through the new year.
ClncClarence is offline  
Old 01-13-2021, 06:52 PM
  #55  
Perennial Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,490
Default

Originally Posted by ClncClarence View Post
The folks at the top who get all the data apparently believe that these measures increase consumer confidence and will get many people to fly who otherwise would not. I completely agree that the efficacy of the policies is dubious, but at this point I don’t really care as long as it puts butts in seats.
It is difficult to see how a test that is somewhat uncomfortable, costs money, and has a reasonably high likelihood of producing both false positives and false negatives is going to incentivize travel, particularly for - as an example - a family with two kids. Assuming you can get there at all, one of the kids comes up as a false positive, what do you do? Leave the kid in BFE is right out. Stay with the kid? And next time you try to go someone else in the family comes down with a false positive?

You and your kids might have to wade the Rio Grande at Ciudad Acuna in the dark of the night to ever get home.

https://ibb
Excargodog is online now  
Old 01-14-2021, 04:29 AM
  #56  
Gets Weekdays Off
 
skywatch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Economy Minus
Posts: 1,053
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog View Post
It is difficult to see how a test that is somewhat uncomfortable, costs money, and has a reasonably high likelihood of producing both false positives and false negatives is going to incentivize travel, particularly for - as an example - a family with two kids. Assuming you can get there at all, one of the kids comes up as a false positive, what do you do? Leave the kid in BFE is right out. Stay with the kid? And next time you try to go someone else in the family comes down with a false positive?

You and your kids might have to wade the Rio Grande at Ciudad Acuna in the dark of the night to ever get home.

https://ibb
And that is exactly what I am afraid of - supposed to do a trip to Mexico in mid February, but we are going to cancel. Cannot take a chance on getting a positive test and getting stuck there for three months. I cannot imagine I am the only one that feels this way. Sure, industry is desperate to try anything, I get that, I wish we could just try using real statistics, actual practical testing for infectiousness, and dial down the doomsday rhetoric instead.
skywatch is offline  
Old 01-14-2021, 05:07 AM
  #57  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Position: B767
Posts: 795
Default

Originally Posted by skywatch View Post
And that is exactly what I am afraid of - supposed to do a trip to Mexico in mid February, but we are going to cancel. Cannot take a chance on getting a positive test and getting stuck there for three months. I cannot imagine I am the only one that feels this way. Sure, industry is desperate to try anything, I get that, I wish we could just try using real statistics, actual practical testing for infectiousness, and dial down the doomsday rhetoric instead.
Exactly. Like many on these forums I have been flying internationally throughout the pandemic. Even with crew exemptions the rules change constantly and it is hard to keep up with the various requirements. There is no way I would fly internationally with my family for vacation right now. Hopefully by summer we will start to see some easing of restrictions but for now things are only tightening up around the globe.
UnusualAttitude is offline  
Old 03-14-2021, 10:38 AM
  #58  
Perennial Reserve
Thread Starter
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,490
Default It might take longer than some people think..

For all those who thought Europe handled this better than the US, they sure seem to be futzing up the endgame:



Excargodog is online now  
Old 03-14-2021, 12:05 PM
  #59  
maxing the min/Moderator
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: 757
Posts: 1,355
Default

Italy toughens Covid restrictions, imposes Easter lockdown


https://www.cnbc.com/2021/03/13/ital...lockdown-.html
jetlaggy is offline  
Old 03-14-2021, 12:27 PM
  #60  
maxing the min/Moderator
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: 757
Posts: 1,355
Default Dubai

Dubai extends preventative measures until mid-April 2021


https://whatson.ae/2021/02/breaking-...id-april-2021/
jetlaggy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Excargodog
Major
15
06-30-2020 08:50 AM
CAL EWR
United
67
11-25-2012 03:46 PM
forgot to bid
Major
15
11-25-2008 09:21 PM
Slaphappy
Regional
0
08-22-2006 11:08 AM
SWAjet
Major
0
05-31-2005 09:35 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices