9-11 Al Qaeda Masterminds get Vaccine
01-30-2021, 06:10 AM
#2
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,278
I'm sure the White House approached this decision with the mindset of, "We value terrorists over FDNY heroes" 
Or maybe, the goal was to prevent a COVID outbreak in a high-security prison in an isolated location surrounded by a hostile country. Giving the prisoners the vaccine protects the service members. If they didn't do this, I'm sure the author would write an article complaining that the Biden administration failed to prevent an outbreak in Gitmo and now there are fewer gaurds available to keep the mastermind behind 9/11 behind bars.
Or maybe, the goal was to prevent a COVID outbreak in a high-security prison in an isolated location surrounded by a hostile country. Giving the prisoners the vaccine protects the service members. If they didn't do this, I'm sure the author would write an article complaining that the Biden administration failed to prevent an outbreak in Gitmo and now there are fewer gaurds available to keep the mastermind behind 9/11 behind bars.
01-30-2021, 06:15 AM
#4
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,063
Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
I'm sure the White House approached this decision with the mindset of, "We value terrorists over FDNY heroes"
Or maybe, the goal was to prevent a COVID outbreak in a high-security prison in an isolated location surrounded by a hostile country. Giving the prisoners the vaccine protects the service members. If they didn't do this, I'm sure the author would write an article complaining that the Biden administration failed to prevent an outbreak in Gitmo and now there are fewer gaurds available to keep the mastermind behind 9/11 behind bars.
Or maybe, the goal was to prevent a COVID outbreak in a high-security prison in an isolated location surrounded by a hostile country. Giving the prisoners the vaccine protects the service members. If they didn't do this, I'm sure the author would write an article complaining that the Biden administration failed to prevent an outbreak in Gitmo and now there are fewer gaurds available to keep the mastermind behind 9/11 behind bars.
01-30-2021, 06:22 AM
#5
Banned
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: Pilot
Posts: 2,625
Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
I'm sure the White House approached this decision with the mindset of, "We value terrorists over FDNY heroes"
Or maybe, the goal was to prevent a COVID outbreak in a high-security prison in an isolated location surrounded by a hostile country. Giving the prisoners the vaccine protects the service members. If they didn't do this, I'm sure the author would write an article complaining that the Biden administration failed to prevent an outbreak in Gitmo and now there are fewer gaurds available to keep the mastermind behind 9/11 behind bars.
Or maybe, the goal was to prevent a COVID outbreak in a high-security prison in an isolated location surrounded by a hostile country. Giving the prisoners the vaccine protects the service members. If they didn't do this, I'm sure the author would write an article complaining that the Biden administration failed to prevent an outbreak in Gitmo and now there are fewer gaurds available to keep the mastermind behind 9/11 behind bars.
01-30-2021, 07:28 AM
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,278
Originally Posted by Flyfalcons
So vaccinate the guards. Not that hard of a problem to solve.
01-30-2021, 07:46 AM
#7
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,236
Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
I'm sure the White House approached this decision with the mindset of, "We value terrorists over FDNY heroes"
Or maybe, the goal was to prevent a COVID outbreak in a high-security prison in an isolated location surrounded by a hostile country. Giving the prisoners the vaccine protects the service members. If they didn't do this, I'm sure the author would write an article complaining that the Biden administration failed to prevent an outbreak in Gitmo and now there are fewer gaurds available to keep the mastermind behind 9/11 behind bars.
Or maybe, the goal was to prevent a COVID outbreak in a high-security prison in an isolated location surrounded by a hostile country. Giving the prisoners the vaccine protects the service members. If they didn't do this, I'm sure the author would write an article complaining that the Biden administration failed to prevent an outbreak in Gitmo and now there are fewer gaurds available to keep the mastermind behind 9/11 behind bars.
01-30-2021, 07:48 AM
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,063
Originally Posted by 2StgTurbine
Except inmates still have to receive medical care. If they get sick, they will be moved to a medical center on base. Moving prisoners to less secure areas is a risk. It wouldn't be hard for one of them to play up their symptoms in order to get closer to a medical professional to harm them. Prisons don't tend to function well when there is an outbreak. Keeping Gitmo operating in a normal state is the goal.
01-30-2021, 08:03 AM
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,278
Originally Posted by Nantonaku
No, there wouldn’t be an article lambasting anyone for not giving the vaccine to terrorists behind 911. Really, who in their right mind would defend this?
"Khalid Sheikh Mohommad attacks a nurse who was treating him for COVID because Biden allowed an outbreak to go unchecked at Gitmo."
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
