Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk > COVID19
Natural Immunity vs Vaccine: >

Natural Immunity vs Vaccine:

Search
Notices
COVID19 Pandemic Information and Reports

Natural Immunity vs Vaccine:

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-30-2021, 10:16 AM
  #541  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,236
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
I am sufficiently confident in natural immunity that I'm skipping the booster for about a year, since we got covid right about when we should have gotten the booster.

Presumably know more a year from now.
What are you going to do if mandates are found lawful and enforced?
Nantonaku is offline  
Old 11-30-2021, 02:26 PM
  #542  
At your mom's house
 
hoover's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: cpt 737
Posts: 2,656
Default

Originally Posted by Mesabah View Post
The original SARS1 infected are still immune 18 years later.
i had H1N1 and havent gotten vaccinated and havent gotten covid and I'm not a stay in your basement type of person. Pretty sure my natural immunity is still working also.
hoover is offline  
Old 11-30-2021, 03:15 PM
  #543  
Gets Weekends Off
 
RI830's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2011
Position: Left seat on a kite
Posts: 1,884
Default

Originally Posted by Nantonaku View Post
What are you going to do if mandates are found lawful and enforced?
He doesn’t have to worry about that.
Additional blow to the mandate makers
US Appeals Court Affirms [Hold on] Mandate
RI830 is offline  
Old 11-30-2021, 08:46 PM
  #544  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Apr 2021
Posts: 28
Default

Here’s another one for ya.
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/judge-allen-winsor-pfizer-eua-comirnaty-vaccines-interchangeable/
ProudAmerican is offline  
Old 12-15-2021, 07:55 AM
  #545  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: 3+ hour sit in the ATL
Posts: 1,982
Default VAERS deaths undercounted by 20 times

Columbia University study. Report just released.

Link here:

https://www.researchgate.net/publica...mortality_risk

Just click the "X" for the "join for free" prompt and you get access.

Abstract:


Accurate estimates of COVID vaccine-induced severe adverse event and death rates are critical for risk-benefit ratio analyses of vaccination and boosters against SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus in different age groups. However, existing surveillance studies are not designed to reliably estimate life-threatening event or vaccine-induced fatality rates (VFR). Here, regional variation in vaccination rates was used to predict all-cause mortality and non-COVID deaths in subsequent time periods using two independent, publicly available datasets from the US and Europe (month-and week-level resolutions, respectively).

Vaccination correlated negatively with mortality 6-20 weeks post-injection, while vaccination predicted all-cause mortality 0-5 weeks post-injection in almost all age groups and with an age-related temporal pattern consistent with the US vaccine rollout. Results from fitted regression slopes (p<0.05 FDR corrected) suggest a US national average VFR of 0.04% and higher VFR with age (VFR=0.004% in ages 0-17 increasing to 0.06% in ages >75 years), and 146K to 187K vaccine-associated US deaths between February and August, 2021. Notably, adult vaccination increased ulterior mortality of unvaccinated young (<18, US; <15, Europe).


Comparing our estimate with the CDC-reported VFR (0.002%) suggests VAERS deaths are underreported by a factor of 20, consistent with known VAERS under-ascertainment bias. Comparing our age-stratified VFRs with published age-stratified coronavirus infection fatality rates (IFR) suggests the risks of COVID vaccines and boosters outweigh the benefits in children, young adults and older adults with low occupational risk or previous coronavirus exposure. We discuss implications for public health policies related to boosters, school and workplace mandates, and the urgent need to identify, develop and disseminate diagnostics and treatments for life-altering vaccine injuries.




Feel sorry for you that took this [vaccine] without sufficient and reasonable science being performed. Good luck.

Last edited by rickair7777; 12-15-2021 at 08:02 AM. Reason: Remove inflammatory reference
Drum is offline  
Old 12-15-2021, 08:19 AM
  #546  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,244
Default

Originally Posted by Drum View Post
Columbia University study. Report just released.

Link here:

https://www.researchgate.net/publica...mortality_risk

Just click the "X" for the "join for free" prompt and you get access.

Abstract:


Accurate estimates of COVID vaccine-induced severe adverse event and death rates are critical for risk-benefit ratio analyses of vaccination and boosters against SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus in different age groups. However, existing surveillance studies are not designed to reliably estimate life-threatening event or vaccine-induced fatality rates (VFR). Here, regional variation in vaccination rates was used to predict all-cause mortality and non-COVID deaths in subsequent time periods using two independent, publicly available datasets from the US and Europe (month-and week-level resolutions, respectively).

Vaccination correlated negatively with mortality 6-20 weeks post-injection, while vaccination predicted all-cause mortality 0-5 weeks post-injection in almost all age groups and with an age-related temporal pattern consistent with the US vaccine rollout. Results from fitted regression slopes (p<0.05 FDR corrected) suggest a US national average VFR of 0.04% and higher VFR with age (VFR=0.004% in ages 0-17 increasing to 0.06% in ages >75 years), and 146K to 187K vaccine-associated US deaths between February and August, 2021. Notably, adult vaccination increased ulterior mortality of unvaccinated young (<18, US; <15, Europe).


Comparing our estimate with the CDC-reported VFR (0.002%) suggests VAERS deaths are underreported by a factor of 20, consistent with known VAERS under-ascertainment bias. Comparing our age-stratified VFRs with published age-stratified coronavirus infection fatality rates (IFR) suggests the risks of COVID vaccines and boosters outweigh the benefits in children, young adults and older adults with low occupational risk or previous coronavirus exposure. We discuss implications for public health policies related to boosters, school and workplace mandates, and the urgent need to identify, develop and disseminate diagnostics and treatments for life-altering vaccine injuries.




Feel sorry for you that took this [vaccine] without sufficient and reasonable science being performed. Good luck.
Don't get too excited yet. One dude, not peer-reviewed. If there's anything to this, it should get looked at by others fairly quickly.

Also apples to oranges... no apparent controls for social factors, ie vaccinated people change their behavior, get out and about and are more subject to vehicle accidents, etc. That would align with age, since younger people didn't change their behavior in the first place as much as at-risk older demographics. That also checks with VAERS "under-reporting... somebody dies in a car wreck, or a slip-n-fall, that's probably not going to make it into VAERS
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 12-15-2021, 10:00 AM
  #547  
Gets Weekdays Off
 
skywatch's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Position: Economy Minus
Posts: 1,053
Default

Originally Posted by rickair7777 View Post
If there's anything to this, it should get looked at by others fairly quickly
What on earth has happened in the last two years to lead you to believe that anything that remotely contradicts the accepted dogma (“the vaccines are safe and effective”) will be looked at quickly?

the lab leak theory? Treatment plans that don’t include fancy new drugs? Certainly not these two, for starters. Science is dead, replaced by agenda driven religion.

seriously, man.
skywatch is offline  
Old 12-15-2021, 10:11 AM
  #548  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,489
Default

Originally Posted by skywatch View Post
What on earth has happened in the last two years to lead you to believe that anything that remotely contradicts the accepted dogma (“the vaccines are safe and effective”) will be looked at quickly?

the lab leak theory? Treatment plans that don’t include fancy new drugs? Certainly not these two, for starters. Science is dead, replaced by agenda driven religion.

seriously, man.
I am not QUITE this cynical, but it would seem inconceivable (cue the Princess Bride memes) that two years into a pandemic and with much of the world still unvaccinated a good study on the effectiveness (or lack of effectiveness) of post-infection immunity has not been done and the only prominent messaging we see about it touts the synergistic effectiveness of post-infection AND immunization boosted together.
Excargodog is offline  
Old 12-15-2021, 10:33 AM
  #549  
Prime Minister/Moderator
 
rickair7777's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2006
Position: Engines Turn Or People Swim
Posts: 39,244
Default

Originally Posted by skywatch View Post
What on earth has happened in the last two years to lead you to believe that anything that remotely contradicts the accepted dogma (“the vaccines are safe and effective”) will be looked at quickly?

the lab leak theory? Treatment plans that don’t include fancy new drugs? Certainly not these two, for starters. Science is dead, replaced by agenda driven religion.

seriously, man.
Not quite EVERYBODY is a part of the vast conspiracy.
rickair7777 is offline  
Old 12-15-2021, 11:00 AM
  #550  
Gets Weekends Off
 
DeltaboundRedux's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2020
Position: Enoch Powell Enthusiast
Posts: 2,121
Default

The FDA publicly arguing in court that they will need 75 YEARS to fully release the redacted Pfizer trial documents submitted to the FDA for approval is not encouraging, nor does it elicit trust.

Quite the opposite.

It's a giant "FU, we know what's best for you, peasant".

(Of course, in theory, Congress could probably overrule this. Or the executive branch. I'm not holding my breath)
DeltaboundRedux is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Excargodog
COVID19
614
11-15-2021 08:26 AM
Excargodog
COVID19
590
03-17-2021 04:56 AM
Excargodog
COVID19
28
01-29-2021 09:41 PM
docav8tor
COVID19
49
12-04-2020 09:56 AM
Excargodog
COVID19
74
10-15-2020 08:34 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices