Time to stop politicizing Ivermectin
09-13-2021, 07:27 AM
#91
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 737 fo
Posts: 908
Originally Posted by AxlF16
Fringe positions rely on fringe sources. Claiming censorship on 'mainstream' sites is a convenient way to dismiss/ignore inconvenient truth.
FWIW what difference is made by the CDC changing the definition of vaccine? Does that somehow render the COVID19 vaccine ineffective or unnecessary? Will all UAL pilots still have to be vaccinated in order to work on 28 September?
FWIW what difference is made by the CDC changing the definition of vaccine? Does that somehow render the COVID19 vaccine ineffective or unnecessary? Will all UAL pilots still have to be vaccinated in order to work on 28 September?
I guess a “fringe source” is an opinion, and no claiming censorship is just pointing out the fact that it does in fact exist.
09-13-2021, 07:39 AM
#92
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: 737 fo
Posts: 908
Originally Posted by Fm0Bm
You guys always attack these obscure websites while never addressing if the information is true or not. The CDC did in fact change the definition on their website. You can't find info contradicting the government anymore on any mainstream site because it's censored. This makes it easy to say "conspiracy website, ignored."
09-13-2021, 08:02 AM
#93
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2014
Posts: 783
If your source is "... the real news" or "the truth" in its tag line, website is hosted by a guy with a @hotmail.com email, or referencing a one off study that flies in the face of the majority of studies its chances of holding up to any scrutiny is slim to none. Ivermectin was used as a delousing agent for immigrants for parasites, lice, worms, etc it isn't and won't be recommended by any respectable doctor for covid until real studies that can withstand scrutiny prove it works for covid. They could study medicated gold bond nut powder to treat covid and I am pretty sure it would be about as useful as ivermectin.
The fact that the 4 of you tin foilers still beat the conspiracy theory drums just makes me sad.
The fact that the 4 of you tin foilers still beat the conspiracy theory drums just makes me sad.
09-13-2021, 08:38 AM
#94
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2017
Posts: 1,109
Originally Posted by Aquaticus
If your source is "... the real news" or "the truth" in its tag line, website is hosted by a guy with a @hotmail.com email, or referencing a one off study that flies in the face of the majority of studies its chances of holding up to any scrutiny is slim to none. Ivermectin was used as a delousing agent for immigrants for parasites, lice, worms, etc it isn't and won't be recommended by any respectable doctor for covid until real studies that can withstand scrutiny prove it works for covid. They could study medicated gold bond nut powder to treat covid and I am pretty sure it would be about as useful as ivermectin.
The fact that the 4 of you tin foilers still beat the conspiracy theory drums just makes me sad.
The fact that the 4 of you tin foilers still beat the conspiracy theory drums just makes me sad.
There are numerous studies and reports given out by reputable sources and doctors that prove Ivermectin works. You keep calling all of these people, including the NIH, conspiracy theorists. Meanwhile, you can’t provide even just ONE piece of evidence that backs up your claim.
My 4 year old niece could draw 3 lines on a piece of paper and it would be more data than you could provide that shows Ivermectin doesn’t work.
09-13-2021, 08:44 AM
#95
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: 787 Captain
Posts: 1,512
Originally Posted by sleeves
The fact that the CDC did change the definition of a vaccine is not a “fringe position”. It was posted because someone questioned what a vaccine was.
I guess a “fringe source” is an opinion, and no claiming censorship is just pointing out the fact that it does in fact exist.
I guess a “fringe source” is an opinion, and no claiming censorship is just pointing out the fact that it does in fact exist.
All opinions are NOT equal so, yes, censorship will always exist to some extent. In the past all of the nut jobs and crazy bastards were relegated to carrying signs on street corners and writing manifestos from secluded cabins. Now they're all out in the open thanks to social media. No - a lot of 'opinions' are total bullsh!t, crazy, or just downright stupid. Some even like to dance on the edges grasping at straws in their self indulgent attempt to defy authority. It's a bit surprising so many of you are pilots but I suppose we're just representative of the population... IMO there should be more, smarter censorship of these people.
09-13-2021, 08:45 AM
#96
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: 787 Captain
Posts: 1,512
Originally Posted by Thedude86
Its actually recommended by thousands of doctors here in the U.S. It’s also recommended in several other countries for use in humans specifically for Covid 19 per pubmed which is managed by the NIH. Are you saying the NIH is a bunch of tin foilers?
There are numerous studies and reports given out by reputable sources and doctors that prove Ivermectin works. You keep calling all of these people, including the NIH, conspiracy theorists. Meanwhile, you can’t provide even just ONE piece of evidence that backs up your claim.
My 4 year old niece could draw 3 lines on a piece of paper and it would be more data than you could provide that shows Ivermectin doesn’t work.
There are numerous studies and reports given out by reputable sources and doctors that prove Ivermectin works. You keep calling all of these people, including the NIH, conspiracy theorists. Meanwhile, you can’t provide even just ONE piece of evidence that backs up your claim.
My 4 year old niece could draw 3 lines on a piece of paper and it would be more data than you could provide that shows Ivermectin doesn’t work.
09-13-2021, 09:03 AM
#98
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Posts: 963
It's true. I'm sorry a right wing gun-crazy religious Trump supporting literal fascist website had to inform you virtuous leftists. I really wish CNN could have broke it more softly to you gentle loving empaths, but it is a fact nonetheless.
Archive.org links...
Last month's definition.
This month' definition.
Maybe they'll change it again. Stay tuned!!!
https://cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/imz-basics.htm
Looks like they weakened the definition considerably. I know. Hits you right in the feels, doesn't it.
Archive.org links...
Last month's definition.
This month' definition.
Maybe they'll change it again. Stay tuned!!!
https://cdc.gov/vaccines/vac-gen/imz-basics.htm
Looks like they weakened the definition considerably. I know. Hits you right in the feels, doesn't it.
09-13-2021, 10:42 AM
#100
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Aug 2008
Position: 787 Captain
Posts: 1,512
Originally Posted by Fm0Bm
Low iq strawman and ad hominems is all you have. You're a cultist.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
