Originally Posted by Drum (Post 3291757)

You obviously haven't done much research into the West African Ebola outbreaks then. We rely heavily on their information at the moment.

Not to mention the Central American surveillance of zika and dengue. The south american surveillance of the same.

Once again, cherry picking.

Ivermectin is a very good treatment. Both pre and during. So is monoclonal antibody. Billions of people are treated with Ivermectin and HCQ protocols that have been developed when politics and profit are not entered into the equation. Healing is the common denominator here.


What is a fact though, is the utter failure of the mRNA jabs. But that, for whatever reasons, can't be discussed.

Originally Posted by GucciBoy (Post 3291770)

Monoclonal antibodies are not FDA approved. They are being used under an EUA. There are no studies on the long-term effects of monoclonal antibodies being introduced into the human body. It is quite irresponsible to tout them as a treatment for COVID when we don’t have any idea what they will do to the body long-term.


See how that sounds? That’s you talking about the vaccine.

Originally Posted by Drum (Post 3291757)

You obviously haven't done much research into the West African Ebola outbreaks then. We rely heavily on their information at the moment.

Not to mention the Central American surveillance of zika and dengue. The south american surveillance of the same.

Once again, cherry picking.

Ivermectin is a very good treatment. Both pre and during. So is monoclonal antibody. Billions of people are treated with Ivermectin and HCQ protocols that have been developed when politics and profit are not entered into the equation. Healing is the common denominator here.


What is a fact though, is the utter failure of the mRNA jabs. But that, for whatever reasons, can't be discussed.

Originally Posted by TiredSoul (Post 3291974)

m-RNA is FAA approved.
Will you risk your medical disclosing off label medication use?
Or intend to lie on your next 8500-8?

Originally Posted by Red Forman (Post 3291992)

If a doctor prescribes me a medication, of course I will disclose it.

Originally Posted by TiredSoul (Post 3291974)

m-RNA is FAA approved.
Will you risk your medical disclosing off label medication use?
Or intend to lie on your next 8500-8?

Originally Posted by GeeWizDriver (Post 3292089)

The way I read the 8500, you only have to disclose the medications you are TAKING while flying. If you grounded yourself while sick, took ANY medication whether OTC or prescription while sick, recovered, discontinued any meds, and then returned to flying, I see no reason why you would have to report it months later.

You only have to retroactively report medical visits. The AME is empowered to inquire as to the nature. I don't retroactively report medications used briefly to treat an acute condition between medicals. Don't have to.

Originally Posted by ThumbsUp (Post 3292171)

Some people are using it a prophylaxis, though, although I think that’s mainly using the Mr. Ed variety here is the US.