Time to stop politicizing Ivermectin
#21
#22
You obviously haven't done much research into the West African Ebola outbreaks then. We rely heavily on their information at the moment.
Not to mention the Central American surveillance of zika and dengue. The south american surveillance of the same.
Once again, cherry picking.
Ivermectin is a very good treatment. Both pre and during. So is monoclonal antibody. Billions of people are treated with Ivermectin and HCQ protocols that have been developed when politics and profit are not entered into the equation. Healing is the common denominator here.
What is a fact though, is the utter failure of the mRNA jabs. But that, for whatever reasons, can't be discussed.
Not to mention the Central American surveillance of zika and dengue. The south american surveillance of the same.
Once again, cherry picking.
Ivermectin is a very good treatment. Both pre and during. So is monoclonal antibody. Billions of people are treated with Ivermectin and HCQ protocols that have been developed when politics and profit are not entered into the equation. Healing is the common denominator here.
What is a fact though, is the utter failure of the mRNA jabs. But that, for whatever reasons, can't be discussed.
Monoclonal antibodies are not FDA approved. They are being used under an EUA. There are no studies on the long-term effects of monoclonal antibodies being introduced into the human body. It is quite irresponsible to tout them as a treatment for COVID when we don’t have any idea what they will do to the body long-term.
See how that sounds? That’s you talking about the vaccine.
#23
Monoclonal antibodies are not FDA approved. They are being used under an EUA. There are no studies on the long-term effects of monoclonal antibodies being introduced into the human body. It is quite irresponsible to tout them as a treatment for COVID when we don’t have any idea what they will do to the body long-term.
See how that sounds? That’s you talking about the vaccine.
See how that sounds? That’s you talking about the vaccine.
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 2,312
You obviously haven't done much research into the West African Ebola outbreaks then. We rely heavily on their information at the moment.
Not to mention the Central American surveillance of zika and dengue. The south american surveillance of the same.
Once again, cherry picking.
Ivermectin is a very good treatment. Both pre and during. So is monoclonal antibody. Billions of people are treated with Ivermectin and HCQ protocols that have been developed when politics and profit are not entered into the equation. Healing is the common denominator here.
What is a fact though, is the utter failure of the mRNA jabs. But that, for whatever reasons, can't be discussed.
Not to mention the Central American surveillance of zika and dengue. The south american surveillance of the same.
Once again, cherry picking.
Ivermectin is a very good treatment. Both pre and during. So is monoclonal antibody. Billions of people are treated with Ivermectin and HCQ protocols that have been developed when politics and profit are not entered into the equation. Healing is the common denominator here.
What is a fact though, is the utter failure of the mRNA jabs. But that, for whatever reasons, can't be discussed.
mRNA vaccines seem to be doing pretty well in Israel and basically everywhere else, if you’re concerned about hospitalization, deaths and other such nonsense. Personally, I’d take the 92.8% efficacy against those and 14x lower hospitalization rate.
https://www.covid-datascience.com/po...are-vaccinated
#26
Banned
Joined APC: Jan 2008
Position: Pilot
Posts: 2,625
#27
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 2,312
Maybe talk to your AME first. AMAS doesn’t have it approved for that purpose. When HCQ was all of the rage for a short time, the FAA issued a grounding memorandum for COVID-purposed use, although it was approved for its intended use after a ground trial.
#28
Speed, Power, Accuracy
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: PIC
Posts: 1,693
You only have to retroactively report medical visits. The AME is empowered to inquire as to the nature. I don't retroactively report medications used briefly to treat an acute condition between medicals. Don't have to.
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Mar 2018
Posts: 2,312
The way I read the 8500, you only have to disclose the medications you are TAKING while flying. If you grounded yourself while sick, took ANY medication whether OTC or prescription while sick, recovered, discontinued any meds, and then returned to flying, I see no reason why you would have to report it months later.
You only have to retroactively report medical visits. The AME is empowered to inquire as to the nature. I don't retroactively report medications used briefly to treat an acute condition between medicals. Don't have to.
You only have to retroactively report medical visits. The AME is empowered to inquire as to the nature. I don't retroactively report medications used briefly to treat an acute condition between medicals. Don't have to.
#30
Speed, Power, Accuracy
Joined APC: Sep 2007
Position: PIC
Posts: 1,693
A close friend and his wife just had moderate Covid. Not vaxxed. They followed the FLCCC protocol that includes the controversial Nobel-winning medication and they both beat it within a week. Anecdotal to be sure but the positive outcomes seem to outweigh the bad.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post