Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > COVID19
Approved Pfizer Vaccine Not Widely Available >

Approved Pfizer Vaccine Not Widely Available

Notices
COVID19 Pandemic Information and Reports

Approved Pfizer Vaccine Not Widely Available

Old 09-16-2021, 03:36 AM
  #1  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: May 2016
Posts: 41
Default Approved Pfizer Vaccine Not Widely Available

With all of the lies and deception coming from the government and the media it is our duty to be skeptics and verify what they say. This topic is particularly concerning being that we are all potentially staring down the barrel of forced vaccinations. It turns out that if the FDA were to fully approve a Pfizer Covid vaccine that is “widely available” then they would have to pull the EUA’s for both Moderna and J&J.

a Pfizer vaccine did indeed get approved. Pfizer now technically has two Covid vaccines. The original Pfizer and BioNTech Covid-19 Vaccine (Emergency Use) and the Pfizer and BioNTech Comirnaty Vaccine (FDA Approved). These vaccines are noted as having “minor differences” but the most important part here is that with the Emergency Use Authorization Pfizer has complete immunity from liability. It appears that their intention is to keep distributing their EUA vaccine while shielding themselves from liability and allowing the other companies to keep the EUA for their vaccines. The FDA approved Comirnaty vaccine is not available to us in most situations. Meanwhile they can sell to us and the public that the vaccine is now “fully approved” and you have no reason not to get it. How are airlines like United mandating vaccines based on a fully approved version that we are not able to obtain? It’s a classic bait and switch move…..the vaccine is approved, but you can’t have that one!!

This is working its way through military lawsuits right now. I would hope hope that our unions and our companies will do their due diligence on this matter. Nobody should be forced to take a vaccine that no company or government will accept any liability for adverse reactions.

Last edited by Privateer89; 09-16-2021 at 04:09 AM.
Privateer89 is offline  
Old 09-16-2021, 04:20 AM
  #2  
maxing the min/Moderator
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: 757 F/O
Posts: 794
Default

“minor LEGAL differences “

What shld they do with the millions of doses that were produced before the approval?
jetlaggy is offline  
Old 09-16-2021, 05:12 AM
  #3  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: May 2016
Posts: 41
Default

They can still distribute those doses but it needs to be known that those are EUA vaccines and not FDA approved vaccines. These are two completely separate vaccines, as defined by Pfizer and the FDA. If they want to mandate vaccines they need to make the FDA approved vaccine widely available, but they can’t do that without sacrificing the EUA’s for all three vaccine makers.

you could be right that it is just a “minor legal difference,” but it’s shady and intentionally misleading. They are selling the original Pfizer vaccine as approved when it is not….The definition of false advertisement. Why did they not just approve the one that they’ve been handing out the entire time? Because they want immunity from liability and they don’t want to sacrifice EUA’s. Not to mention that they intend to keep producing and distributing the original vaccine while falsely marketing it as FDA approved with the help of the government and the media.

Last edited by Privateer89; 09-16-2021 at 05:26 AM.
Privateer89 is offline  
Old 09-16-2021, 05:33 AM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,064
Default

Originally Posted by jetlaggy View Post
“minor LEGAL differences “

What shld they do with the millions of doses that were produced before the approval?
Why would there be a difference in the doses? That doesn’t make any sense that they would be treated differently. All the data and testing was done on the old doses not on some yet to be made vaccine supply. And more importantly, why the confusion? Almost seems intentional. Even Senators have written letters asking for clarification because they are confused.
Nantonaku is offline  
Old 09-16-2021, 07:36 AM
  #5  
maxing the min/Moderator
 
Joined APC: Aug 2005
Position: 757 F/O
Posts: 794
Default

Its a lawyer redtape issue. ie. they would need to collect the doses back and change the label on them etc
Seems silly but nothing surprises me now days.
jetlaggy is offline  
Old 09-16-2021, 07:52 AM
  #6  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: Perpetual 4F1R
Posts: 1,461
Default

Originally Posted by Privateer89 View Post
With all of the lies and deception coming from the government and the media it is our duty to be skeptics and verify what they say. This topic is particularly concerning being that we are all potentially staring down the barrel of forced vaccinations. It turns out that if the FDA were to fully approve a Pfizer Covid vaccine that is “widely available” then they would have to pull the EUA’s for both Moderna and J&J.

a Pfizer vaccine did indeed get approved. Pfizer now technically has two Covid vaccines. The original Pfizer and BioNTech Covid-19 Vaccine (Emergency Use) and the Pfizer and BioNTech Comirnaty Vaccine (FDA Approved). These vaccines are noted as having “minor differences” but the most important part here is that with the Emergency Use Authorization Pfizer has complete immunity from liability. It appears that their intention is to keep distributing their EUA vaccine while shielding themselves from liability and allowing the other companies to keep the EUA for their vaccines. The FDA approved Comirnaty vaccine is not available to us in most situations. Meanwhile they can sell to us and the public that the vaccine is now “fully approved” and you have no reason not to get it. How are airlines like United mandating vaccines based on a fully approved version that we are not able to obtain? It’s a classic bait and switch move…..the vaccine is approved, but you can’t have that one!!

This is working its way through military lawsuits right now. I would hope hope that our unions and our companies will do their due diligence on this matter. Nobody should be forced to take a vaccine that no company or government will accept any liability for adverse reactions.
You should read Sen Johnsons's (R-WI) letter to FDA on same subject. He demands answers to five very good questions.

He also does a very good job of calling them out on their weasel wording and lawyer-eze.

Here's a link:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...-Comirnaty.pdf
Drum is offline  
Old 09-16-2021, 09:07 AM
  #7  
Line Holder
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: May 2016
Posts: 41
Default

Originally Posted by Drum View Post
You should read Sen Johnsons's (R-WI) letter to FDA on same subject. He demands answers to five very good questions.

He also does a very good job of calling them out on their weasel wording and lawyer-eze.

Here's a link:
https://childrenshealthdefense.org/w...-Comirnaty.pdf
Thanks that is a great letter! I would like to know the response that he was supposed to get by August 30th. If I’m forced to take a vaccine that I do not want in order to keep my job I absolutely want to confirm that it is the FDA approved version and I will be covered under any future lawsuits. I would hate to see anybody thinking that they are getting an FDA version but later finding out that they were part of experimental use.
Privateer89 is offline  
Old 09-16-2021, 01:57 PM
  #8  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: Perpetual 4F1R
Posts: 1,461
Default

Originally Posted by Privateer89 View Post
Thanks that is a great letter! I would like to know the response that he was supposed to get by August 30th. If I’m forced to take a vaccine that I do not want in order to keep my job I absolutely want to confirm that it is the FDA approved version and I will be covered under any future lawsuits. I would hate to see anybody thinking that they are getting an FDA version but later finding out that they were part of experimental use.
To date, Sen Johnson has not received a response from the FDA.

Shocking I know.
Drum is offline  
Old 09-16-2021, 02:08 PM
  #9  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 6,863
Default

Does seem a mite like bait and switch. I imagine if the FAA caught you switching experimental aircraft parts for PMA’d parts they’d $hit bricks, apparently the FDA is a little more laissez-faire…
Excargodog is offline  
Old 09-16-2021, 02:36 PM
  #10  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Aug 2021
Posts: 39
Default

Lol all these mental gymnastics to keep from taking a safe, effective, and free vaccine. At this point I'm legit convinced you people are intentionally trying to murder others.
Justaguy19 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
detpilot
Corporate
9
02-05-2010 08:17 PM
stealth114
Flight Schools and Training
1
01-27-2010 02:24 PM
viperdriver
Cargo
13
05-22-2009 06:40 AM
usmc-sgt
Hangar Talk
6
01-02-2009 05:10 AM
RXS676
Flight Schools and Training
5
09-07-2008 02:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread