US Appeals Court Affirms [Hold on] Mandate
#1
US Appeals Court Affirms [Hold on] Mandate
COR: “U.S. appeals court affirms hold on Biden COVID-19 vaccine mandate“
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/fed...te-2021-11-12/Nov 12 (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court on Friday upheld its decision to put on hold an order by President Joe Biden for companies with 100 workers or more to require COVID-19 vaccines, rejecting a challenge by his administration.
A three-member panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans affirmed its ruling despite the Biden administration's position that halting implementation of the vaccine mandate could lead to dozens or even hundreds of deaths. read more
"The mandate is staggeringly overbroad," the opinion said.
"The mandate is a one-size-fits-all sledgehammer that makes hardly any attempt to account for differences in workplaces (and workers)," Circuit Court Judge Kurt Engelhardt wrote for the panel.
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/fed...te-2021-11-12/Nov 12 (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court on Friday upheld its decision to put on hold an order by President Joe Biden for companies with 100 workers or more to require COVID-19 vaccines, rejecting a challenge by his administration.
A three-member panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans affirmed its ruling despite the Biden administration's position that halting implementation of the vaccine mandate could lead to dozens or even hundreds of deaths. read more
"The mandate is staggeringly overbroad," the opinion said.
"The mandate is a one-size-fits-all sledgehammer that makes hardly any attempt to account for differences in workplaces (and workers)," Circuit Court Judge Kurt Engelhardt wrote for the panel.
Last edited by rickair7777; 11-17-2021 at 09:11 AM. Reason: Title Clarity
#4
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 910
#7
#8
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Posts: 910
#9
Best take I've read on the vaccine mandates:
Companies unquestionably have the legal right to mandate vaccines as a condition of employment.
The Federal government, using OSHA has a proxy, probably does not.
It's the second one that's going to be winding its way through the federal court system.
Companies unquestionably have the legal right to mandate vaccines as a condition of employment.
The Federal government, using OSHA has a proxy, probably does not.
It's the second one that's going to be winding its way through the federal court system.
#10
Banned
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Position: 3+ hour sit in the ATL
Posts: 1,982
Best take I've read on the vaccine mandates:
Companies unquestionably have the legal right to mandate vaccines as a condition of employment.
The Federal government, using OSHA has a proxy, probably does not.
It's the second one that's going to be winding its way through the federal court system.
Companies unquestionably have the legal right to mandate vaccines as a condition of employment.
The Federal government, using OSHA has a proxy, probably does not.
It's the second one that's going to be winding its way through the federal court system.
You need to read Judge Engelhardt's opinion. There is a test of reasonableness at play here with corporations. For example, they mandate you must take a shot of bleach to cure "X". I'm being absurd to illustrate the absurdity of this whole mandate thing.
Judge Engelhardt is laying the foundation for the reasonableness test that eventually WILL wind up in front of the SCOTUS. Private companies have some leeway in what they can do to potential job seeking candidates, as wells as those in current employ but they are also bound to reasonableness. Judge is saying here that not only is the OSHA vector "staggeringly overbroad", so is the mandating of a medical procedure from private corporations.
The administration didn't do its homework on these mandates. Definitely jumping the shark many times over.
This will be great law drama for months to come.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post