Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   COVID19 (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/covid19/)
-   -   Two shots not enough… (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/covid19/135722-two-shots-not-enougho.html)

Tfork 11-26-2021 07:20 AM


Originally Posted by Mesabah (Post 3327313)
You already posted the link, read the methodology. The state compares death
certificates to vaccine databases. The system assumes any positive pcr test within 60 days of death is unvaccinated, unless linked to a vaccination record. If a fully vaccinated death is found, it is then investigated for truth using hospital records. https://ourworldindata.org/covid-deaths-by-vaccination

I see you are mostly correct. The underlying data is from the CDC. According to them:


"Vaccination status: A fully vaccinated person had SARS-CoV-2 RNA or antigen detected on a respiratory specimen collected ≥14 days after completing the primary series of an FDA-authorized or approved COVID-19 vaccine. An unvaccinated person had SARS-CoV-2 RNA or antigen detected on a respiratory specimen and has not been verified to have received COVID-19 vaccine. Excluded were partially vaccinated people who received at least one FDA-authorized vaccine dose but did not complete a primary series ≥14 days before collection of a specimen where SARS-CoV-2 RNA or antigen was detected.

Deaths: A COVID-19–associated death occurred in a person with a documented COVID-19 diagnosis who died; health department staff reviewed to make a determination using vital records, public health investigation, or other data sources. Rates of COVID-19 deaths by vaccination status are reported based on when the patient was tested for COVID-19, not the date they died. Deaths usually occur up to 30 days after COVID-19 diagnosis."

Seems pretty methodical to me. I think you're correct that there can be variations in the data but not enough to change the outcome. However, I can find no better data.

Mesabah 11-26-2021 08:01 AM


Originally Posted by Tfork (Post 3327371)
Seems pretty methodical to me. I think you're correct that there can be variations in the data but not enough to change the outcome. However, I can find no better data.

We can agree to disagree, the study is significantly biased towards the vaccine. Also, there is a data lag that will probably last years, which means that data will be heavily revised in the future. The other problem is that Covid is only a serious disease in people with a dysfunctional immune system, the vaccine does nothing to address this. It reeks of statistical manipulation, time will tell.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:37 PM.


User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands