Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Pilot Lounge > Hangar Talk > COVID19
DOJ appealing as expected >

DOJ appealing as expected

Notices
COVID19 Pandemic Information and Reports

DOJ appealing as expected

Old 04-24-2022, 04:36 AM
  #51  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Crown's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2016
Position: Not an RJ driver anymore
Posts: 1,030
Default

Originally Posted by Red Forman View Post
It could be proven that being mask less is actually better for you and these idiots would still be pushing for it.
This. Exactly this. Masks have become such a symbol of the Left that to even dare be seen without one is risking the circular firing squad that the Left is so known for
Crown is offline  
Old 04-25-2022, 03:28 AM
  #52  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2011
Position: Hoping for any position
Posts: 2,488
Default

Anyone know when this appeal is supposed to be heard?
fishforfun is offline  
Old 04-25-2022, 09:24 AM
  #53  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Mar 2006
Position: guppy CA
Posts: 5,133
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy View Post
They deemed her unqualified based on the long established standards of requiring 12 years experience to be appointed to the federal bench. They actually did say some complementary things about her outside of that.
I've read more than a few ABA reviews. There have been judge nominees with less than 12 years' experience that were found to be qualified. Judge Mizelle's CV leans pretty hard right, including her clerkships and her membership in professional associations,

The charge of left wing bias by the ABA is pretty well documented. As a result of this, both W's and Trump's administrations did not solicit ABA reviews of their nominees. The practice of ABA review of nominees started in the Eisenhower administration.

Here are a couple of articles discussing the ABA's bias:
https://www.nationalreview.com/bench...dvocacy-group/
https://www.forbes.com/2009/04/06/or...h=21d8cd9043c9
There are more out there, some dispute the liberal bias. But then if one looks at the cumulative data of judges deemed unqualified by the ABA, the scales tip inordinately in the appearance of liberal bias.

Originally Posted by DeltaboundRedux View Post
Ad homenin attack which does not address the ruling or the issues raised in the lawsuit.

Something the judge did at the request of the government.

Correctly reasoned item not, she did better than you did here.
A quick google search of 'ABA Bias' would have confirmed that this was not an ad hominin attack.

As for the CDC, a government agency, the proper method of implementing a mask mandate is to go through the NPRM (notice of proposed rulemaking) process. Not to try to bend a 1940s Act to try to fit the current pandemic.

Last edited by Andy; 04-25-2022 at 09:49 AM.
Andy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EZBW
United
131
05-04-2017 08:19 PM
OnTheKlacker
Major
208
09-09-2010 12:36 AM
newKnow
Mergers and Acquisitions
20
10-30-2008 09:01 AM
Freight Dog
Major
2
11-20-2006 08:44 PM
miker1
Regional
21
02-13-2006 03:54 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices