Search
Notices

C Series Info

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-31-2017, 09:07 AM
  #1961  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,117
Default

Originally Posted by tunes View Post
that's just an opinion. Nothing about knowing how a drop of fuel gets from the fuel truck to the engine makes you a professional.
Nope, that is a fact. Having suffered thru 20+ years of the Air Force's "You're a molecule of air, cool me" approach to training, I agree that the "build the airplane" mindset is not indicitive of professionalism. However, the mindset of, "I'm not reading it if they don't pay me" is also not indicative of a professional. Pretty sure most professionals don't adhere to the "If the minimums weren't good enough, they wouldn't be minimums" philosophy. And therein lies the big debate as to whether airline pilots are professionals or merely highly compensated hourly wage workers. The longer I am in the biz, the more I lean toward the latter.
FL370esq is offline  
Old 12-31-2017, 09:33 AM
  #1962  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,503
Default

Originally Posted by FL370esq View Post
Nope, that is a fact. Having suffered thru 20+ years of the Air Force's "You're a molecule of air, cool me" approach to training, I agree that the "build the airplane" mindset is not indicitive of professionalism. However, the mindset of, "I'm not reading it if they don't pay me" is also not indicative of a professional. Pretty sure most professionals don't adhere to the "If the minimums weren't good enough, they wouldn't be minimums" philosophy. And therein lies the big debate as to whether airline pilots are professionals or merely highly compensated hourly wage workers. The longer I am in the biz, the more I lean toward the latter.


I wasn't saying for the mentality of they don't pay me to read it so I don't. I'm saying that simply reading the vol 2 doesn't make you a professional


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
tunes is offline  
Old 12-31-2017, 09:38 AM
  #1963  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,117
Default

Originally Posted by tunes View Post
I wasn't saying for the mentality of they don't pay me to read it so I don't. I'm saying that simply reading the vol 2 doesn't make you a professional


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So we are in agreement. Happy New Year to you and yours.
FL370esq is offline  
Old 12-31-2017, 05:20 PM
  #1964  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp View Post
Oh gosh. Guys flipped out on me using V/S in the Boeings, too. Button pushers that don't understand why they are doing what they are doing can get extremely annoying.

3:1 math quick and a transition to V/S or FPV fix things very quick with high accuracy on every airplane... then go banging away at the MCDU to back you up with the tennis ball/barney's butthole.
Isn't it better to read back the clearance, whatever it is, and then go heads down for as long as it takes to fix it even when its too late to fix it and never say anything?
gloopy is offline  
Old 12-31-2017, 05:22 PM
  #1965  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Default

Originally Posted by GogglesPisano View Post
Errors? You want errors? 2 years on the 717 and the Vol 2 is still a doozy. 4 pages on how the toilets work (all wrong.) Maybe 6 pages on the Autoflight System (mostly wrong.) No wonder no one reads them.

Best systems book ever was the CRJ200 FCOM. Enough schematics, PSI’s and voltages to make an engineer wet his pants. Absorb what you want, discard the rest.

Now they’re written by interns whose second language is English.
gloopy is offline  
Old 12-31-2017, 09:03 PM
  #1966  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy View Post
That's how the 717 vol 2 was. "I'm going to read the vol 2 from cover to cover... okay I'm 3 pages in, saw the specs... lavatory, How it works... okay I'm in...2 pages of lav... 3... 4.5..6? 7?? 8!?!?? ### it. Not reading this."
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 01-01-2018, 07:34 AM
  #1967  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GogglesPisano's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: On the hotel shuttle
Posts: 5,812
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid View Post
That's how the 717 vol 2 was. "I'm going to read the vol 2 from cover to cover... okay I'm 3 pages in, saw the specs... lavatory, How it works... okay I'm in...2 pages of lav... 3... 4.5..6? 7?? 8!?!?? ### it. Not reading this."
Yup. Somehow I muddled through. Then I realized there were systems on the zip drive (bungee-rubber-band-break-out-build-a-better-mousetrap-right-elevator-only-in case off loss of right wing) that didn't even make it into the Vol2.

Shiraj just gave up in 2000.
GogglesPisano is offline  
Old 01-01-2018, 07:35 AM
  #1968  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesBond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: A350 Both
Posts: 7,292
Default

Originally Posted by FL370esq View Post
Absolutely nothing wrong with that because DL (and, by extension, the FAA) only expects you to know enough to pass the eSV and oral (recall items, limitations and walk-around slides). However, you have quite succinctly illustrated the difference in mentality between a professional and an hourly wage earner.
This^^^^^^^^^^^^^
JamesBond is offline  
Old 01-01-2018, 07:41 AM
  #1969  
Gets Weekends Off
 
JamesBond's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: A350 Both
Posts: 7,292
Default

Originally Posted by FL370esq View Post
Nope, that is a fact. Having suffered thru 20+ years of the Air Force's "You're a molecule of air, cool me" approach to training, I agree that the "build the airplane" mindset is not indicitive of professionalism. However, the mindset of, "I'm not reading it if they don't pay me" is also not indicative of a professional. Pretty sure most professionals don't adhere to the "If the minimums weren't good enough, they wouldn't be minimums" philosophy. And therein lies the big debate as to whether airline pilots are professionals or merely highly compensated hourly wage workers. The longer I am in the biz, the more I lean toward the latter.
Well that attitude is the winning one that's for sure. (no sarcasm) The company/lawyers/manufacturers don't want you to know any more than you "need" to. Someday, when our required knowledge level is that of a high school drop out with regard to our machine and it's operations, and everything is an autoland, we will probably be about as valuable as those people. I think it is called technology creep. We will succumb to it one day as a "profession".


Glad I won't be around then.

The old joke about the pilot and a dog are starting to look more and more likely, except the dog will be working 10-15 flights from the ATL and you will only be there to turn on the autopilot.
JamesBond is offline  
Old 01-03-2018, 12:53 PM
  #1970  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Position: Left
Posts: 1,807
Default

Yet ANOTHER example of why Boeing’s claim that the CSeries is hurting 737 MAX 7 orders is BOGUS! Southwest is deferring MAX 7 orders until 2023 and upguaging to 737 MAX 8 airplanes - and that is not Bombardier’s fault...

See article below:

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/03/southwest-airlines-wants-larger-boeing-737-max-8s-soon.html
David Puddy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
acousticgrace
Regional
10
09-25-2014 10:37 AM
rmr1992
Cargo
24
09-11-2014 09:17 AM
Horhay
United
131
02-13-2013 10:58 PM
fartsarefunny
Foreign
6
06-14-2012 05:17 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices