Search
Notices

Delta FTI

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-22-2018, 09:06 AM
  #21  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Default

Originally Posted by badflaps View Post
And the Co. supports you in what way if there is a problem?
gloopy is offline  
Old 05-22-2018, 10:17 AM
  #22  
Da Hudge
 
80ktsClamp's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2006
Position: Poodle Whisperer
Posts: 17,473
Default

Originally Posted by badflaps View Post
And the Co. supports you in what way if there is a problem?
If you follow the flow in the TOPP, they have to. Stuff we are allowed to defer have nothing more complicated than pulling a circuit breaker or moving a switch to off, and the MEL makes it specifically clear as well that we are allowed to defer it. The simple ones are just writing a placard and telling dispatch/mx control eventually when it is convenient that it broke and we deferred it.
80ktsClamp is offline  
Old 05-22-2018, 10:58 AM
  #23  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GogglesPisano's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: On the hotel shuttle
Posts: 5,808
Default

Originally Posted by WideRide View Post
Understood. Your choice. I just wanted you (and others) to know that you can, for certain items.
Understood, WD. It’s all good.

I just read the pertinent sections of the FOM and the TOPP and we are both correct (as in there are limited circumstances where we are allowed to “dispatch” without contacting MCC first.) However, in the example above, the discovery was at the gate before block-out. Pilot Placarding is never authorized in that case.
GogglesPisano is offline  
Old 05-22-2018, 11:08 AM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: undefined
Posts: 328
Default

getting back to the OP, why are we continuing to allow this? FTI's reduce the need for SLI's, which are higher paid, and allow for more pilot hiring. If they cant get enough able bodies from our ranks, let the company incentivize the SLI position?
pilotc90a is offline  
Old 05-22-2018, 11:57 AM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Posts: 278
Default

Originally Posted by pilotc90a View Post
...why are we continuing to allow this? FTI's reduce the need for SLI's, which are higher paid, and allow for more pilot hiring. If they cant get enough able bodies from our ranks, let the company incentivize the SLI position?
The #’s of FTI’s on property is less than half of what was on staff 8 years ago. That’s not the issue. The number of FTI’s with further decline in the coming months/years with the introduction of Distance Learning increasing at home. Systems Validations are going to be done at home, with an open book, with no Instructor needed.

The larger issue is the #’s of DGS instructors that Delta has. If you add them all up, you have roughly 515 lost line pilot jobs due to increases in DGS staffing.

But profit sharing checks are nice, so why should ALPA care right?
FMGEC is offline  
Old 05-23-2018, 11:02 AM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp View Post
If you follow the flow in the TOPP, they have to. Stuff we are allowed to defer have nothing more complicated than pulling a circuit breaker or moving a switch to off, and the MEL makes it specifically clear as well that we are allowed to defer it. The simple ones are just writing a placard and telling dispatch/mx control eventually when it is convenient that it broke and we deferred it.
I agree in theory. But how do you know that there isn't a history on the same thing? I see zero advantage other than trying to save literally a minute or two in A-14 time or whatever, to not at least call MX/dispatch. If they are so swamped they don't have one minute to spare, then that's probably more reason that you need to talk to them. If they don't have a single manpower minute to spare to say "cool just crew placard it and we'll ACARS the rest en route" then there is no reason for pilots be in such a hurry in the first place.
gloopy is offline  
Old 05-23-2018, 02:32 PM
  #27  
Gets Weekends Off
 
StartngOvr's Avatar
 
Joined APC: May 2014
Position: Drivin’ the bus
Posts: 717
Default Delta FTI

Originally Posted by gloopy View Post
I agree in theory. But how do you know that there isn't a history on the same thing? I see zero advantage other than trying to save literally a minute or two in A-14 time or whatever, to not at least call MX/dispatch. If they are so swamped they don't have one minute to spare, then that's probably more reason that you need to talk to them. If they don't have a single manpower minute to spare to say "cool just crew placard it and we'll ACARS the rest en route" then there is no reason for pilots be in such a hurry in the first place.


There are some times when a couple minutes are the difference between getting out and not. Flight/duty time limits. Severe weather approaching the airport. Min fuel. EDCT. IT Department implosion, etc. It's good to have the flexibility IF NEEDED. Just my opinion.

If you're the Captain, and it's your prerogative that this procedure is never appropriate, I think that's fine. No issues. I don't think there's anything requiring you to use it.

If it causes a gate return, crew timeout etc, I think you need to own it. It's certainly possible a chief pilot may ask for your reasoning.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
StartngOvr is offline  
Old 05-24-2018, 05:54 AM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2007
Position: undefined
Posts: 328
Default

Originally Posted by FMGEC View Post
The #’s of FTI’s on property is less than half of what was on staff 8 years ago. That’s not the issue. The number of FTI’s with further decline in the coming months/years with the introduction of Distance Learning increasing at home. Systems Validations are going to be done at home, with an open book, with no Instructor needed.

The larger issue is the #’s of DGS instructors that Delta has. If you add them all up, you have roughly 515 lost line pilot jobs due to increases in DGS staffing.

But profit sharing checks are nice, so why should ALPA care right?
First, I think youre confusing the FTI position with the FTPI position. FTPI's will continue to shrink, or get converted to the NEW FTI position. Some of the DGS instructors will also likely convert to the new FTI position, reducing the numbers of DGS instructors, but our expose to them remains the same.

I agree with you that the DGS position needs to be curtailed. I've heard (and experienced) DGS horror stories. The problem never goes away, just shifted around a bit. The problem from a company perspective is they cannot hire enough SLI's because few want to work that many days, and our line pilot cadre has a low opinion of our SLI's and neither side wants to expend the negotiating capital to improve the job.

My desire is for ALPA to limit the number of DGS (and FTI) instructors, while also being open to incentivizing the best instructors to teach.

Other workgroups "Me Too" clauses should work for us too. FA instructors, get both positive space and paid hotel rooms for out of base instructors. why don't we?
pilotc90a is offline  
Old 05-24-2018, 09:29 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Han Solo's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: Fastest Hunk of Junk in the Galaxy
Posts: 1,657
Default

Originally Posted by pilotc90a View Post
First, I think youre confusing the FTI position with the FTPI position. FTPI's will continue to shrink, or get converted to the NEW FTI position. Some of the DGS instructors will also likely convert to the new FTI position, reducing the numbers of DGS instructors, but our expose to them remains the same.

I agree with you that the DGS position needs to be curtailed. I've heard (and experienced) DGS horror stories. The problem never goes away, just shifted around a bit. The problem from a company perspective is they cannot hire enough SLI's because few want to work that many days, and our line pilot cadre has a low opinion of our SLI's and neither side wants to expend the negotiating capital to improve the job.

My desire is for ALPA to limit the number of DGS (and FTI) instructors, while also being open to incentivizing the best instructors to teach.

Other workgroups "Me Too" clauses should work for us too. FA instructors, get both positive space and paid hotel rooms for out of base instructors. why don't we?
How do our line pilots have a low opinion of SLIs? Those guys make excellent pilots on the line and they reign in a significant portion of the unrealistic expectations from the training department when you're lucky enough to sim with an SLI instead of DGS.
Han Solo is offline  
Old 05-24-2018, 09:34 AM
  #30  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Default

Originally Posted by StartngOvr View Post
If it causes a gate return, crew timeout etc, I think you need to own it. It's certainly possible a chief pilot may ask for your reasoning.
Button Push Ignored.
gloopy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
WatchThis!
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 07:25 PM
Sir James
Mergers and Acquisitions
2
04-14-2008 06:28 PM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM
RockBottom
Major
0
09-15-2006 09:50 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices