![]() |
Originally Posted by ExAF
(Post 2632496)
I really didn't want to get involved in this thread, but the blue bolded above made my antennae perk up. You do know it's a little hard to put 3K a month into a S or P fund when you are furloughed, right?:rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 2632366)
That being said, the glaring omission in your missive is that you don't have to adjust anything in your career because it has all been settled, and it is all in your name. There are many here who do not have that luxury. Your post still screams of 'tough toenails'.
Sure 401k is in our name now, but it doesn't mean a secure retirement or lucrative career is guaranteed. |
Originally Posted by ExAF
(Post 2632496)
I really didn't want to get involved in this thread, but the blue bolded above made my antennae perk up. You do know it's a little hard to put 3K a month into a S or P fund when you are furloughed, right?:rolleyes:
|
Originally Posted by Spudhauler
(Post 2632494)
I was furloughed for the better part of half a decade. Tough toenails for all of us.
I am not complaining about that either just so you know, but I did have a backup plan if I got booted. |
Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
(Post 2632511)
How do you know he won't have to adjust anything? Can you see the future? Yes, times are good now, but just as it has been in the past one's actual career probably won't look anything like one had imagined it would.
Sure 401k is in our name now, but it doesn't mean a secure retirement or lucrative career is guaranteed. |
Originally Posted by TED74
(Post 2632512)
... not to mention that even if you HAD 36k/yr in free cash for retirement savings, 770k ain't enough to live off of for 30 years.
|
Originally Posted by TED74
(Post 2632512)
... not to mention that even if you HAD 36k/yr in free cash for retirement savings, 770k ain't enough to live off of for 30 years.
And here's 30 seconds of research to show that even $770K is a first world 'problem'. https://www.cnbc.com/2017/04/07/how-...every-age.html |
Originally Posted by JamesBond
(Post 2632513)
Yup. I didn't get furloughed, but I was 235 (or so) from the bottom of the list for those same number of years you were out.
|
Ill be honest, Im very much against any pension due to the fears many have previously posted. Ill bite though and ask those of you who believe we should get one, please explain what exactly you would like to see, how you would to see it rolled out, and what would you be willing to sacrifice for it? Im only assuming that if this passed the company would remove our 401K DC and make it at best a "typical 401K" and have some kind of basic % match.
Im honestly trying to see what bullet points (preferably more comprehensive) you all have in favor of such an idea. Its easy in my opinion to complain about what were leaving on the table but I and Im sure others would like to hear specifics. The devil is in the details and the details matter. |
Originally Posted by Dorn
(Post 2632594)
Ill be honest, Im very much against any pension due to the fears many have previously posted. Ill bite though and ask those of you who believe we should get one, please explain what exactly you would like to see, how you would to see it rolled out, and what would you be willing to sacrifice for it? Im only assuming that if this passed the company would remove our 401K DC and make it at best a "typical 401K" and have some kind of basic % match.
Im honestly trying to see what bullet points (preferably more comprehensive) you all have in favor of such an idea. Its easy in my opinion to complain about what were leaving on the table but I and Im sure others would like to hear specifics. The devil is in the details and the details matter. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:17 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands