From ALPA National to DL Management?
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,883
#22
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Don't think this is good. It would be much better if he were on our side of the table. He probably would be on our side of the table had we been able to keep our stuff together at ALPA National's BOD meeting or if we had not gotten really wild with some of our choices for Reps. There is no politically viable way for him to work for us.
Reality check, we have had 5 scope Chairmen in less than two years (assuming Brent gets replaced). We just had a negotiator resign. We lack the political stability and discipline to develop our team properly.
Reality check, we have had 5 scope Chairmen in less than two years (assuming Brent gets replaced). We just had a negotiator resign. We lack the political stability and discipline to develop our team properly.
#23
This is definitely not new, but it is definitely not right, either. Everyone in an ALPA position should be subject to a non-compete. I'd make it 5 years minimum. This is why DPA came to be, accountability and transparency. I don't know if it will continue but it's obvious to me we need a watchdog/challenger.
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Posts: 270
This is definitely not new, but it is definitely not right, either. Everyone in an ALPA position should be subject to a non-compete. I'd make it 5 years minimum. This is why DPA came to be, accountability and transparency. I don't know if it will continue but it's obvious to me we need a watchdog/challenger.
#25
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 1,631
I like the ALPA national EA. He’s articulate, intelligent, and given many years to ALPA. If it’s true he’s gone to the company side for scope, I’m glad it’s him and not a pilot-hater lawyer. Maybe he can explain to his new bosses our positions on JVs.
Maybe he would try to make progress and get a mutually happy deal for both the company and us.
If the company didn’t want to make progress, they could have left his new position vacant.
Maybe he would try to make progress and get a mutually happy deal for both the company and us.
If the company didn’t want to make progress, they could have left his new position vacant.
#26
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,989
#28
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jan 2014
Posts: 228
Don't think this is good. It would be much better if he were on our side of the table. He probably would be on our side of the table had we been able to keep our stuff together at ALPA National's BOD meeting or if we had not gotten really wild with some of our choices for Reps. There is no politically viable way for him to work for us.
Reality check, we have had 5 scope Chairmen in less than two years (assuming Brent gets replaced). We just had a negotiator resign. We lack the political stability and discipline to develop our team properly.
Reality check, we have had 5 scope Chairmen in less than two years (assuming Brent gets replaced). We just had a negotiator resign. We lack the political stability and discipline to develop our team properly.
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
I like the ALPA national EA. He’s articulate, intelligent, and given many years to ALPA. If it’s true he’s gone to the company side for scope, I’m glad it’s him and not a pilot-hater lawyer. Maybe he can explain to his new bosses our positions on JVs.
Maybe he would try to make progress and get a mutually happy deal for both the company and us.
If the company didn’t want to make progress, they could have left his new position vacant.
Maybe he would try to make progress and get a mutually happy deal for both the company and us.
If the company didn’t want to make progress, they could have left his new position vacant.
Like the billions and billions and billions they wasted on RJs?
I think we can do without that.
#30
Can't abide NAI
Joined APC: Jun 2007
Position: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Posts: 11,989
From what I am hearing Rick Dominguez will be managing partner relationships and NOT involved in negotiations.
Last edited by Bucking Bar; 12-10-2018 at 08:54 PM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post