Next AE: March-April 2019
03-26-2019, 10:42 AM
#1221
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: A320 Left seat
Posts: 2,580
Originally Posted by Trip7
That post by BS on SkyHub has caused anticipation to reach fever pitch. Folks are going to be waiting in hope for published results today. I'm guessing tomorrow more likely. Top Men on FB still saying Friday. Interesting times
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
You never know though, where there’s a will, there’s a way.
03-26-2019, 11:26 AM
#1222
Rerouted On Weekends
Joined APC: Oct 2015
Position: 717A
Posts: 2,937
Originally Posted by Big E 757
I agree, I didn’t think they’d get it done this week, if I had to bet between today or tomorrow, I’d take tomorrow.
You never know though, where there’s a will, there’s a way.
You never know though, where there’s a will, there’s a way.
03-26-2019, 12:02 PM
#1225
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,117
Originally Posted by Gunfighter
They mentioned that senior pilots with more than two years remaining were requesting a training bypass. That limited the bypasses that would be awarded to junior pilots with less time remaining. I bet there will be some surprised pilots in training this time.
03-26-2019, 12:57 PM
#1230
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,458
Originally Posted by FL370esq
The "within" 2 years (currently age 63+) bypass can be unilaterally imposed by the Company, regardless of the pilot's wishes. However, in order to do so, the company must comply with the conditions in the exception. Between age 60 and 63, a bypass may be granted but both parties have to agree (Company and the pilot) and the exception in 22.E.13.b does not apply. While the pilot would likely agree to/ask for a bypass, it is hard to imagine the company would want to bypass someone with 2+ years of availability, even if it is an AE with a 365 day conversion window.
In short, it isn't a seniority issue, it is a retirement date issue. Seniority is not referenced in the provision.
In short, it isn't a seniority issue, it is a retirement date issue. Seniority is not referenced in the provision.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
