Search
Notices

LAX 717 Displacement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-16-2019, 05:59 AM
  #11  
Super Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,868
Default

Originally Posted by Humboldt View Post
There is an obvious swap of 717 pilots to the A320 in LAX going on. In the company’s world, it would be ideal if all 717 pilots bid the A320. But in the real world that probably won’t happen.

So here is a hypothetical, since LAX is currently an all Boeing base, let’s say that the top 50 717As don’t ever want to fly an Airbus and decide to MD bid LAX 737A. Could they theoretically bid MD’s to the 737 in LAX and displace 50 current LAX 737 captains? Those 737As would probably become A320A but still, should junior LAX 737As be prepared for displacment?

Your hypothetical leaves out the point that a lot of 737 Pilots in LAX are also going to bid over to the Bus. With that said, if I would not be surprised if some junior folks in different categories get displaced even though systemwide the Bid is positive.

Scoop
Scoop is offline  
Old 03-16-2019, 06:10 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 631
Default

Originally Posted by FL370esq View Post
You are correct. No LAX73NA vacancies have been published so, if no LAX73NA bids out of the category thus creating a contingent vacancy, there would be 50 contingent displacements from the 73N. The company cannot arbitrarily elect to increase the size of a category as the result of an AE/VD/MD run in order to avoid/minimize contingency displacements. The exception to this would be pilots awarded a training bypass or who will retire within the conversion window. Not sure how many B73NAs would qualify for either though.
You mean can elect to increse size right?
Peoloto is offline  
Old 03-16-2019, 06:26 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,117
Default

Originally Posted by Peoloto View Post
You mean can elect to increse size right?
Nope....I'm pretty sure I mean they cannot elect. They need to first post vacancies before they can grow a category size.
FL370esq is offline  
Old 03-16-2019, 08:07 AM
  #14  
Roll’n Thunder
 
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Position: Pilot
Posts: 3,547
Default

There are also probably senior people from other bases who want in on the LAX 320 action...
tennisguru is offline  
Old 03-16-2019, 10:33 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Gunfighter's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,458
Default

Originally Posted by Humboldt View Post
There is an obvious swap of 717 pilots to the A320 in LAX going on. In the company’s world, it would be ideal if all 717 pilots bid the A320. But in the real world that probably won’t happen.

So here is a hypothetical, since LAX is currently an all Boeing base, let’s say that the top 50 717As don’t ever want to fly an Airbus and decide to MD bid LAX 737A. Could they theoretically bid MD’s to the 737 in LAX and displace 50 current LAX 737 captains? Those 737As would probably become A320A but still, should junior LAX 737As be prepared for displacment?
There will certainly be some 717As that will move to 73N. There will undoubtedly be numerous qualifiers across LAX. The SEA 330 expansion could pull some 7ER pilots out of LAX, making room for the displacements. The 320 will probably pull in a few SLC 320 pilots.

Originally Posted by Peoloto View Post
You mean can elect to increase size right?
There is some uncertainty regarding expanding a category via MD without contingent displacements. Nobody (myself included) has provided a contract reference or evidence from previous AEs. FL370esq is generally VERY GOOD about providing contract references and neither of us have found one for this particular topic. It's just fun to discuss it without facts, rather than actually look it up. Originally I was confident it could be done, now I'm not as sure. If they grow a category via MD, they could have denied a senior pilot the option for an AE. Right now if there is a vacancy posted a senior AE will go ahead of the MD to fill it and the MD will get a subsequent choice. Expanding via MD is benefiting the junior pilots and not strictly honoring seniority. A corollary to this argument is that the company can shrink a category without an MD by not backfilling. Why are they allowed to arbitrarily reduce staffing in a category without providing MD rights?

We will know in a few weeks once the results are out.
Gunfighter is offline  
Old 03-16-2019, 11:16 AM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
Default

You guys are displacing 717 pilots? Yikes, from where to where?
ShyGuy is offline  
Old 03-16-2019, 11:36 AM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2015
Posts: 631
Default

Originally Posted by Gunfighter View Post
There will certainly be some 717As that will move to 73N. There will undoubtedly be numerous qualifiers across LAX. The SEA 330 expansion could pull some 7ER pilots out of LAX, making room for the displacements. The 320 will probably pull in a few SLC 320 pilots.


There is some uncertainty regarding expanding a category via MD without contingent displacements. Nobody (myself included) has provided a contract reference or evidence from previous AEs. FL370esq is generally VERY GOOD about providing contract references and neither of us have found one for this particular topic. It's just fun to discuss it without facts, rather than actually look it up. Originally I was confident it could be done, now I'm not as sure. If they grow a category via MD, they could have denied a senior pilot the option for an AE. Right now if there is a vacancy posted a senior AE will go ahead of the MD to fill it and the MD will get a subsequent choice. Expanding via MD is benefiting the junior pilots and not strictly honoring seniority. A corollary to this argument is that the company can shrink a category without an MD by not backfilling. Why are they allowed to arbitrarily reduce staffing in a category without providing MD rights?

We will know in a few weeks once the results are out.
I’m still convinced they can grow it if they want to and avoid displacing. I can’t find anything saying they cannot. I would imagine the AE pilot will get the category if they want and then throw the MDs in and evaluate the end size.
Peoloto is offline  
Old 03-16-2019, 12:03 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Big E 757's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2013
Position: A320 Left seat
Posts: 2,580
Default

Originally Posted by ShyGuy View Post
You guys are displacing 717 pilots? Yikes, from where to where?
We are closing the LAX 717 category and moving the aircraft to ATL. We/they are opening an A320 category in LAX though which should absorb most or all of the 717 pilots so it shouldn’t cause too much pain out west.
Big E 757 is offline  
Old 03-16-2019, 12:52 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,117
Default

Originally Posted by Gunfighter View Post
There will certainly be some 717As that will move to 73N. There will undoubtedly be numerous qualifiers across LAX. The SEA 330 expansion could pull some 7ER pilots out of LAX, making room for the displacements. The 320 will probably pull in a few SLC 320 pilots.


There is some uncertainty regarding expanding a category via MD without contingent displacements. Nobody (myself included) has provided a contract reference or evidence from previous AEs. FL370esq is generally VERY GOOD about providing contract references and neither of us have found one for this particular topic. It's just fun to discuss it without facts, rather than actually look it up. Originally I was confident it could be done, now I'm not as sure. If they grow a category via MD, they could have denied a senior pilot the option for an AE. Right now if there is a vacancy posted a senior AE will go ahead of the MD to fill it and the MD will get a subsequent choice. Expanding via MD is benefiting the junior pilots and not strictly honoring seniority. A corollary to this argument is that the company can shrink a category without an MD by not backfilling. Why are they allowed to arbitrarily reduce staffing in a category without providing MD rights?

We will know in a few weeks once the results are out.
Good points, sir. As to your corollary, I cannot find anything in the PWA that expressly permits the company to "unfill" posted vacancies much less contingent vacancies. The initial A350 AE being a case-in-point where 160 vacancies were posted but only 125 or so filled. Perhaps if the company reasonably determines they could not train all of the vacancies to comply with the posted conversion window they can minimize the number of filled vacancies. Or maybe it is another "historical practice" agreed upon between the company and DALPA.

Originally Posted by Gunfighter View Post
Right now if there is a vacancy posted a senior AE will go ahead of the MD to fill it and the MD will get a subsequent choice.
This isn't correct based upon the exception to 22.E.1 which is further discussed in the middle of page 107 of the Scheduling Reference Handbook. "In other words, a pilot's MD [or VD] assignment...into a category will supersede a more senior pilot's AE bid to that category.

Originally Posted by Gunfighter View Post
We will know in a few weeks once the results are out.
Yup, no doubt that it will be an interesting (and long) read of the AE/VD/MD results. Gonna need lots of James Bond's popcorn.
FL370esq is offline  
Old 03-16-2019, 01:55 PM
  #20  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jul 2017
Posts: 52
Default

Just to check... because the LAX 320 category is a new category, anyone can bid it, even those who are currently seat locked. Did I get that right? Thanks!
askdanny is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
iahflyr
American
5
07-21-2018 09:06 PM
jsled
United
232
07-24-2016 09:34 AM
APC225
United
84
01-04-2014 04:35 PM
ERJ135
Regional
43
07-21-2008 06:49 PM
dvhighdrive88
Major
6
04-03-2008 11:49 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices