Search
Notices

Dog Mauls Pax

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-30-2019, 06:04 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Default

Ther wer a cuple of news stories of these incidents on our flights. Involving crew and pax.

The offending animal i recall was a type most of us ' uninformed' dopes wud put in a class of animal bred for physical and behaviorial traits that make them responsible for half the fatal maulings in the US.

So call them tinkerbell if you want. Most will understand the class with one simple 3 letter descriptor.

Standing at gate i had 'roid boy walk up with abt a 70lb male. Uneutered. His ESA. My FAs were frightened of the animal. Im wondering how i cant bring scissors thru security but this guy and his dog are no problemo?

The duty pilot tells me delta will replace us all before denying boarding to a ESA. ADA and all. I told him if this continues its not a matter of if...but when.

Turns out this event with the pax face had happened abt 6 mos prior. So delta already knew there was a problem.

We have had pax and crew injured by ESA. It was an idiotic open policy that thankfully has had some level of sanity now installed.
BobZ is offline  
Old 05-30-2019, 06:54 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 7ER B...whatever that means.
Posts: 3,966
Default

Originally Posted by Baradium View Post
I don't think any of the changes to policy would have prevented this. I don't see how Delta can have actual liability here considering the law required them to allow an emotional support animal.
Actually, the law does NOT require accommodation of ESAs. That's just a genie that the airlines let out of the bottle years ago and Delta has been one of the few organizations taking steps to put it back in.

https://www.adatitleiii.com/2018/08/...out-the-truth/

Under the ADA, only a dog or miniature horse (no, we are not joking) can serve as service animals. The ADA requires public accommodations to allow service animals to accompany their owners anywhere the owners can go, although the Department of Justice made clear a few years ago that they can be prohibited from swimming pools (in the water) as well as shopping carts. The ADA provides no protection for emotional support animals in public accommodations.
See also,
Can you really bring a peacock on a plane? Service and support animals, explained. - The Washington Post https://www.washingtonpost.com/graph...als-explained/

I wonder if some liability might help influence the airlines to put a stop to this nonsense.

Last edited by freezingflyboy; 05-30-2019 at 07:06 AM.
freezingflyboy is online now  
Old 05-30-2019, 07:16 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
Default

Originally Posted by Baradium View Post
I don't think any of the changes to policy would have prevented this. I don't see how Delta can have actual liability here considering the law required them to allow an emotional support animal.
Objection: deep pockets.

Sustained.
gloopy is offline  
Old 05-30-2019, 07:33 AM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Left seat of a little plane
Posts: 2,396
Default

Originally Posted by freezingflyboy View Post
Actually, the law does NOT require accommodation of ESAs. That's just a genie that the airlines let out of the bottle years ago and Delta has been one of the few organizations taking steps to put it back in.

https://www.adatitleiii.com/2018/08/...out-the-truth/



See also,
Can you really bring a peacock on a plane? Service and support animals, explained. - The Washington Post https://www.washingtonpost.com/graph...als-explained/

I wonder if some liability might help influence the airlines to put a stop to this nonsense.
Did you not read this part of the article?

"Airplanes. The Air Carrier Access Act (ACAA), not the ADA, governs accommodations for people with disabilities on airplanes. The Department of Transportation (DOT) is responsible for enforcing the ACAA rules. Historically, the rules have required accommodations for emotional support animals, but recent abuses of the rules by passengers seeking to bring all manner of animals such as peacocks and pigs onto planes has caused the DOT to revisit this issue in a pending rulemaking."


While the ADA doesn't compel airlines to accommodate ESAs, other government channels do. Ridiculous. The airlines should have protested the whole ESA concept the first moment a Stalinist in DC put out the whole ACAA language, enabling an entire class of neurotic, narcissistic sorts.

NOW there is a move (led by Delta thankfully) to rein this stuff in. Too bad it had to get to this. I feel very bad for the mauled passenger. Never should have happened. But that would actually entail saying "No" to someone and checking their entitled self.
Herkflyr is offline  
Old 05-30-2019, 10:00 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,117
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy View Post
Objection: deep pockets.

Sustained.
Deep pockets.......and Delta is a common carrier and common carriers are held to a much higher standard of care than you or I which means it is relatively easy to prevail in a negligence claim against an airline. Double whammy when the deep pockets have a different negligence standard.
FL370esq is offline  
Old 05-30-2019, 12:31 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,100
Default

Dogs are getting out of control at a lot of business places. You can't even go into Home Depot now without seeing multiple people who feel it's necessary to take their dog shopping. Pretty sad. No emotional support dogs should be on the plane at all. If someone needs emotional support they certainly should not be flying.
3 green is offline  
Old 05-30-2019, 12:40 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Flying Monkey's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2006
Position: MadDog gear slinger
Posts: 568
Default

Originally Posted by ESQ702 View Post
Just think what would have happened if I had brought my animal support goose on board instead of that dog. Dude would be toast.
7 or 8 years ago we had a woman onboard with an emotional support goose. Wearing a diaper.

Edit - The goose was wearing a diaper. I’m not going to guess what undergarments the woman was wearing.
Flying Monkey is offline  
Old 05-30-2019, 12:46 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 7ER B...whatever that means.
Posts: 3,966
Default

2 years ago I had two "ESAs" get into a fight during a flight. Now I gotta ask, how emotionally supportive is your snarling, barking, barely controllable animal being when the mere presence of another animal "emotionally supporting" its owner sets you off? Definitely got a hard eye roll and a "boot em both!" from THIS liberal millennial.
freezingflyboy is online now  
Old 05-30-2019, 12:51 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Posts: 8,898
Default

An emotional support peacock at EWR. IIRC, United denied the passenger.

ShyGuy is offline  
Old 05-30-2019, 12:56 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2011
Position: retired 767(dl)
Posts: 5,723
Default

Back in the day, as a ramprat, I had the opportunity to board in the animal bin, dogs cats and birds. I arranged them in the order of natural selection. Never heard how that worked out.
badflaps is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Freight Dog
Hangar Talk
3
05-08-2010 05:46 PM
yyzhead
Foreign
0
02-07-2008 05:46 PM
palgia841
Major
9
12-07-2007 07:11 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices