Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Being punished for calling in fatigued. >

Being punished for calling in fatigued.

Search
Notices

Being punished for calling in fatigued.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-09-2019, 12:54 PM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2011
Posts: 794
Default

Just remember everyone, calling in fatigued, and choosing to not accept an extension because you would not be fit to operate it are two distinctly different things. If you call in fatigued, it ties their hands, and they have to put you into rest right away. If you say you cannot accept an extension, then they can reroute you into a shorter segment that does not require an extension.

Everyone is different, but for me, the longer the flight that will operate into the two hour extension, the harder it is to be sure I would be fit to fly by the end of that flight. I don't think the company is going after people who choose not to extend. I also doubt they are going after people who call in fatigued unless it is just exceedingly obvious abuse. In that case, wouldn't you want the company to go after them? I know there are exceptions and sometimes an innocent person gets caught up or falsely targeted, but most of the times when I hear all of the facts from both sides I see why the company chooses to investigate certain actions.

The key with sick leave, fatigue, and extensions, is if you are actually not ready to go, you shouldn't fly. One of the reasons we get paid the big bucks is to make these sometimes tough decisions.

Be safe out there.
4fans is online now  
Old 06-09-2019, 01:04 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,921
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf View Post
Just remember you can’t extend after you have been rerouted.
This is false. I had an incident last week where I got a reroute that showed me getting in 9 minutes before having to extend. When I looked closer at rotation, I realized they had the flight attendants were scheduled for a 20 minute turn. Obviously our reroute went into the extension. I called crew tracking and the 24 hour ALPA line. I was told by both that it was a legal reroute and I wasn't rerouted into an extension but delayed into an extension.

I actually believe the post about looking for people to make examples of. I called in fatigue one time years ago and ended up getting calls from 2 duty pilots and a chief pilot. The chief pilot was threatening my pay even though there was no legit threat as I was content getting paid for what I actually did (my call was at end of rotation when I was rerouted to fly instead of deadhead). Fatiguing out is absolutely more hassle than continuing.
hockeypilot44 is offline  
Old 06-09-2019, 01:18 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
notEnuf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: stake holder ir.delta.com
Posts: 10,026
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44 View Post
This is false. I had an incident last week where I got a reroute that showed me getting in 9 minutes before having to extend. When I looked closer at rotation, I realized they had the flight attendants were scheduled for a 20 minute turn. Obviously our reroute went into the extension. I called crew tracking and the 24 hour ALPA line. I was told by both that it was a legal reroute and I wasn't rerouted into an extension but delayed into an extension.

These extensions are BS. They circumvent the safety recommendations of the research and effectively returned the length of duty to the pre-117 limitless day. You choose to extend, then hold or exceed the extension because of operational issues once airborne, next thing you know the duty day is way over the “limit.”

I actually believe the post about looking for people to make examples of. I called in fatigue one time years ago and ended up getting calls from 2 duty pilots and a chief pilot. The chief pilot was threatening my pay even though there was no legit threat as I was content getting paid for what I actually did (my call was at end of rotation when I was rerouted to fly instead of deadhead). Fatiguing out is absolutely more hassle than continuing.
Which you chose to extend into. My point was the reroute can’t be scheduled into the extension. In your case the 20 min turn was not realistic and could be argued was an illegal assignment because of the known delay. You should have stated you will not extend because there is no realistic estimate of the length of your duty, therefore no way to ensure you will be adequately fit for the undefined duty.
notEnuf is offline  
Old 06-09-2019, 01:20 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2012
Posts: 609
Default

Originally Posted by hockeypilot44 View Post

I actually believe the post about looking for people to make examples of. I called in fatigue one time years ago and ended up getting calls from 2 duty pilots and a chief pilot. The chief pilot was threatening my pay even though there was no legit threat as I was content getting paid for what I actually did (my call was at end of rotation when I was rerouted to fly instead of deadhead). Fatiguing out is absolutely more hassle than continuing.
How exactly would they make an example of you?

Since the last Contract there is a process now for fatigue calls and pay. Dalpa periodically puts out the statistics and an Overwhelming majority of pilots are getting paid.
Rooster435 is offline  
Old 06-09-2019, 01:30 PM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
notEnuf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: stake holder ir.delta.com
Posts: 10,026
Default

You known your fatigued when you are frustrated dealing with calculating extensions of every crew member to see if you can legally operate the flight.
notEnuf is offline  
Old 06-09-2019, 01:30 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,909
Default

Was told the story of a recent fatigue call...

LCA was rerouted with his F/O into a long and challenging day and subsequently called in fatigued; F/O also called in. Review board was willing to pay the captain, but initially declined to pay-protect the F/O on the identical rotation. They reportedly said “he bid to fly with LCAs, that’s on him.” LCA followed up, justifiably livid and was reported to have succeeded in overturning the board’s decision.

How anyone on this board found bidding strategy relevant to fatigue pay protection determination (clearly iaw the PWA and normal PBS functionality) is beyond me. If I ever trusted the system before, I sure don’t any longer.
TED74 is offline  
Old 06-09-2019, 01:37 PM
  #17  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Aug 2006
Position: A330 First Officer
Posts: 1,465
Default

Originally Posted by TED74 View Post
Was told the story of a recent fatigue call...

LCA was rerouted with his F/O into a long and challenging day and subsequently called in fatigued; F/O also called in. Review board was willing to pay the captain, but initially declined to pay-protect the F/O on the identical rotation. They said “he bid to fly with LCAs, that’s on him.” LCA followed up, justifiably livid and was reported to have succeeded in overturning the board’s decision.

How anyone on this board found bidding strategy relevant to fatigue pay protection determination (clearly iaw the PWA and normal PBS functionality) is beyond me. If I ever trusted the system before, I sure don’t any longer.
Ok someone clarify something for me. I thought the fatigue board consisted on two alpa guys and two company guys and the tie goes to the pilot so, unless you do something really stupid like calling in fatigued leg 1 day 1, the decision should always fail safe to paying the pilot.
DALMD88FO is offline  
Old 06-09-2019, 01:45 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by TED74 View Post
Was told the story of a recent fatigue call...

LCA was rerouted with his F/O into a long and challenging day and subsequently called in fatigued; F/O also called in. Review board was willing to pay the captain, but initially declined to pay-protect the F/O on the identical rotation. They reportedly said “he bid to fly with LCAs, that’s on him.” LCA followed up, justifiably livid and was reported to have succeeded in overturning the board’s decision.

How anyone on this board found bidding strategy relevant to fatigue pay protection determination (clearly iaw the PWA and normal PBS functionality) is beyond me. If I ever trusted the system before, I sure don’t any longer.
The board does not even function as your post suggests and how you were awarded the trip would not even be considered. The board simply looks at the specifics of the fatigue call. The board refusing to award pay is in single digits.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 06-09-2019, 01:53 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
notEnuf's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2015
Position: stake holder ir.delta.com
Posts: 10,026
Default

Originally Posted by TED74 View Post
Was told the story of a recent fatigue call...

LCA was rerouted with his F/O into a long and challenging day and subsequently called in fatigued; F/O also called in. Review board was willing to pay the captain, but initially declined to pay-protect the F/O on the identical rotation. They reportedly said “he bid to fly with LCAs, that’s on him.” LCA followed up, justifiably livid and was reported to have succeeded in overturning the board’s decision.

How anyone on this board found bidding strategy relevant to fatigue pay protection determination (clearly iaw the PWA and normal PBS functionality) is beyond me. If I ever trusted the system before, I sure don’t any longer.
So is the inference that LCAs are supernatural and don’t require sleep or are impervious to fatigue? If you can’t hang with Superman don’t bid to fly with him.
notEnuf is offline  
Old 06-09-2019, 01:54 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
GogglesPisano's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Sep 2013
Position: On the hotel shuttle
Posts: 5,812
Default

Originally Posted by TED74 View Post
They reportedly said “he bid to fly with LCAs, that’s on him.” LCA followed up, justifiably livid and was reported to have succeeded in overturning the board’s decision.
.
Not following here. Do LCA’s have different duty days than everyone else?
GogglesPisano is online now  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tennesseeflyboy
Cargo
26
11-23-2020 05:47 PM
Splanky
Regional
12
05-23-2010 09:21 PM
tennesseeflyboy
Cargo
23
04-28-2010 05:20 AM
MrBigAir
Regional
19
11-11-2008 09:33 PM
Piloto Noche
Cargo
13
09-11-2007 07:20 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices