Search
Notices

DL/Virgin Flying

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-19-2019, 03:36 PM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,110
Default DL/Virgin Flying

I support our union in our quest to negotiate beneficial scope provisions.

With that said, they keep talking about losing "a JFK-LHR" flight.
Aren't we flying other flights to LHR from other cities in a greater amount than we had?

Does anyone know how many flights we had pre JV to LHR compared to now? And the same for Virgin. I'd like to know.

Seems like the MEC was simply cherry picking that one flight.
marcal is offline  
Old 08-19-2019, 04:11 PM
  #2  
Line Holder
 
The Rover's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2019
Position: Right seat of a big Boeing
Posts: 77
Default

Not exactly sure what you're referencing. The DALPA Scope matters page says that since the inception of the Virgin Atlantic JV that our block hours between the U.S. and the U.K. are almost flat while Virgins has grown by 33%.

Delta also owns 49% of Virgin Atlantic, so DAL keeps most of the profits.

This gets addressed in the next TA or I'll vote no.

Scope............

Nothing else matters.
The Rover is offline  
Old 08-19-2019, 04:28 PM
  #3  
Banned
 
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 648
Default

Originally Posted by The Rover View Post
Not exactly sure what you're referencing. The DALPA Scope matters page says that since the inception of the Virgin Atlantic JV that our block hours between the U.S. and the U.K. are almost flat while Virgins has grown by 33%.

Delta also owns 49% of Virgin Atlantic, so DAL keeps most of the profits.

This gets addressed in the next TA or I'll vote no.

Scope............

Nothing else matters.
Is there a difference between block hours and ASM in terms of proportion?
ChecklistMonkey is offline  
Old 08-19-2019, 04:30 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,908
Default

Originally Posted by The Rover View Post

Delta also owns 49% of Virgin Atlantic, so DAL keeps most of the profits.
Unfortunately, too many of us are comforted by the profit sharing check they believe captures the "wins" where we're ceding flying. Our individual share of JV partner profits is so diluted by the time that PS becomes take home pay (and 401k contributions), that it's nearly inconsequential. I'd obviously much rather Delta metal be flying more, and hope PS isn't pacifying the masses.
TED74 is offline  
Old 08-19-2019, 04:32 PM
  #5  
veut gagner à la loterie
 
forgot to bid's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Apr 2008
Position: Light Chop
Posts: 23,286
Default

Originally Posted by TED74 View Post
Unfortunately, too many of us are comforted by the profit sharing check they believe captures the "wins" where we're ceding flying. Our individual share of JV partner profits is so diluted by the time that PS becomes take home pay (and 401k contributions), that it's nearly inconsequential. I'd obviously much rather Delta metal be flying more, and hope PS isn't pacifying the masses.
Easy solution is to quantify how many jobs does it mean? 100 crews?

Otherwise it's like listening to stock brokers purposefully try to lose you with yields, percentages, points and curve talks.
forgot to bid is offline  
Old 08-19-2019, 04:40 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,908
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid View Post
Easy solution is to quantify how many jobs does it mean? 100 crews?

Otherwise it's like listening to stock brokers purposefully try to lose you with yields, percentages, points and curve talks.
...or go the other way (or do both), and break down how much a pilot takes home from each JV's profit sharing/loss segment. I have no idea if Virgin nets me $5, $50 or $500 a year. Surely it's less than a GS, right?
TED74 is offline  
Old 08-19-2019, 05:15 PM
  #7  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: Looking left
Posts: 3,249
Default

Originally Posted by The Rover View Post
Not exactly sure what you're referencing. The DALPA Scope matters page says that since the inception of the Virgin Atlantic JV that our block hours between the U.S. and the U.K. are almost flat while Virgins has grown by 33%.

Delta also owns 49% of Virgin Atlantic, so DAL keeps most of the profits.

This gets addressed in the next TA or I'll vote no.

Scope............

Nothing else matters.
New guy here, so bear with me....

Why do I keep seeing folks including the MEC using block hours as their measuring stick, when the Virgin scope section in the PWA clearly spells out ASK as the metric....what am I missing?

PWA chart shows the DL min percentage of combined DL/VS twin aisle ASK is between 66 and 69%. Is DL meeting that or not?

My simple brain understands that we as pilot get paid for block flown so we obviously want more hours for us to fly, but if DL is meeting the min percentages mention above, then wouldn't they be in compliance with the PWA regardless if the block hours have remained flat?
DWC CAP10 USAF is offline  
Old 08-19-2019, 06:10 PM
  #8  
Gets Weekends Off
 
saturn's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2012
Position: Supreme Allied Commander
Posts: 1,054
Default

Originally Posted by DWC CAP10 USAF View Post
New guy here, so bear with me....

Why do I keep seeing folks including the MEC using block hours as their measuring stick, when the Virgin scope section in the PWA clearly spells out ASK as the metric....what am I missing?

PWA chart shows the DL min percentage of combined DL/VS twin aisle ASK is between 66 and 69%. Is DL meeting that or not?

My simple brain understands that we as pilot get paid for block flown so we obviously want more hours for us to fly, but if DL is meeting the min percentages mention above, then wouldn't they be in compliance with the PWA regardless if the block hours have remained flat?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but did ALPA ever claim the VS JV was out of compliance? I think it's more of an attempt to educate/incite/rally the troops to fight for improved scope limits.
saturn is offline  
Old 08-19-2019, 07:14 PM
  #9  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 43
Default

Originally Posted by DWC CAP10 USAF View Post
New guy here, so bear with me....

Why do I keep seeing folks including the MEC using block hours as their measuring stick, when the Virgin scope section in the PWA clearly spells out ASK as the metric....what am I missing?

PWA chart shows the DL min percentage of combined DL/VS twin aisle ASK is between 66 and 69%. Is DL meeting that or not?

My simple brain understands that we as pilot get paid for block flown so we obviously want more hours for us to fly, but if DL is meeting the min percentages mention above, then wouldn't they be in compliance with the PWA regardless if the block hours have remained flat?
A block hour fight is going to look pretty silly when supersonic travel makes a come back in not so distant future.
exitrow is offline  
Old 08-19-2019, 08:21 PM
  #10  
Gets Weekends Off
 
2StgTurbine's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2010
Posts: 2,276
Default

I have always hated these JV metrics. The overall premise is that our flying will never dip below what it was before the JV was announced. While that sounds fine in the short term, are we really going to rely on these metrics 10-20 years out? Imagine if our present flying was limited to what Delta flew in 1999.
2StgTurbine is online now  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
boog123
Delta
6
07-14-2016 11:26 AM
Seggy
Major
94
04-11-2015 10:18 AM
MacGuy2
Cargo
32
07-07-2012 03:51 AM
dd89
Flight Schools and Training
34
08-23-2009 11:08 AM
Kilgore Trout
Part 135
46
06-19-2009 03:35 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices