RAH Pilots want jumpseat priority
#1
RAH Pilots want jumpseat priority
According to RAH,
Unknown to AA pilots, both DL & UA have been giving jumpseat priority to RAH pilots over AA pilots regardless of check in time, on the basis of “special relationship.”
The RAH pilots are now pushing for jumpseat priority over other OAL carriers on AA as well. This means that the current practice of checkin time won’t count. If a RAH guy shows up a DL or UA guy would get bumped from the jumpseat.
The RAH guys say this is exactly how it’s done on DL & UA today for them already. I don’t think the average AA guy knows he’s coming behind a RAH guy regardless of check in time.
Personally, I’d rather see DL & UA stop giving priority to one non owned OAL over another. The alternative would seem to be to tell the DL & UA pilots they have to come after RAH and the half dozen special relationship vendors on AA flights too. Then it will have created a scenario where vendor/contractors always come ahead first on all legacy carriers.
Here’s the debate going on....
Republic Airline Unilateral JS Action
Unknown to AA pilots, both DL & UA have been giving jumpseat priority to RAH pilots over AA pilots regardless of check in time, on the basis of “special relationship.”
The RAH pilots are now pushing for jumpseat priority over other OAL carriers on AA as well. This means that the current practice of checkin time won’t count. If a RAH guy shows up a DL or UA guy would get bumped from the jumpseat.
The RAH guys say this is exactly how it’s done on DL & UA today for them already. I don’t think the average AA guy knows he’s coming behind a RAH guy regardless of check in time.
Personally, I’d rather see DL & UA stop giving priority to one non owned OAL over another. The alternative would seem to be to tell the DL & UA pilots they have to come after RAH and the half dozen special relationship vendors on AA flights too. Then it will have created a scenario where vendor/contractors always come ahead first on all legacy carriers.
Here’s the debate going on....
Republic Airline Unilateral JS Action
#2
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 648
According to RAH,
Unknown to AA pilots, both DL & UA have been giving jumpseat priority to RAH pilots over AA pilots regardless of check in time, on the basis of “special relationship.”
The RAH pilots are now pushing for jumpseat priority over other OAL carriers on AA as well. This means that the current practice of checkin time won’t count. If a RAH guy shows up a DL or UA guy would get bumped from the jumpseat.
The RAH guys say this is exactly how it’s done on DL & UA today for them already. I don’t think the average AA guy knows he’s coming behind a RAH guy regardless of check in time.
Personally, I’d rather see DL & UA stop giving priority to one non owned OAL over another. The alternative would seem to be to tell the DL & UA pilots they have to come after RAH and the half dozen special relationship vendors on AA flights too. Then it will have created a scenario where vendor/contractors always come ahead first on all legacy carriers.
Here’s the debate going on....
Republic Airline Unilateral JS Action
Unknown to AA pilots, both DL & UA have been giving jumpseat priority to RAH pilots over AA pilots regardless of check in time, on the basis of “special relationship.”
The RAH pilots are now pushing for jumpseat priority over other OAL carriers on AA as well. This means that the current practice of checkin time won’t count. If a RAH guy shows up a DL or UA guy would get bumped from the jumpseat.
The RAH guys say this is exactly how it’s done on DL & UA today for them already. I don’t think the average AA guy knows he’s coming behind a RAH guy regardless of check in time.
Personally, I’d rather see DL & UA stop giving priority to one non owned OAL over another. The alternative would seem to be to tell the DL & UA pilots they have to come after RAH and the half dozen special relationship vendors on AA flights too. Then it will have created a scenario where vendor/contractors always come ahead first on all legacy carriers.
Here’s the debate going on....
Republic Airline Unilateral JS Action
#3
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Apr 2016
Position: Looking left
Posts: 3,249
According to RAH,
Unknown to AA pilots, both DL & UA have been giving jumpseat priority to RAH pilots over AA pilots regardless of check in time, on the basis of “special relationship.”
The RAH pilots are now pushing for jumpseat priority over other OAL carriers on AA as well. This means that the current practice of checkin time won’t count. If a RAH guy shows up a DL or UA guy would get bumped from the jumpseat.
The RAH guys say this is exactly how it’s done on DL & UA today for them already. I don’t think the average AA guy knows he’s coming behind a RAH guy regardless of check in time.
Personally, I’d rather see DL & UA stop giving priority to one non owned OAL over another. The alternative would seem to be to tell the DL & UA pilots they have to come after RAH and the half dozen special relationship vendors on AA flights too. Then it will have created a scenario where vendor/contractors always come ahead first on all legacy carriers.
Here’s the debate going on....
Republic Airline Unilateral JS Action
Unknown to AA pilots, both DL & UA have been giving jumpseat priority to RAH pilots over AA pilots regardless of check in time, on the basis of “special relationship.”
The RAH pilots are now pushing for jumpseat priority over other OAL carriers on AA as well. This means that the current practice of checkin time won’t count. If a RAH guy shows up a DL or UA guy would get bumped from the jumpseat.
The RAH guys say this is exactly how it’s done on DL & UA today for them already. I don’t think the average AA guy knows he’s coming behind a RAH guy regardless of check in time.
Personally, I’d rather see DL & UA stop giving priority to one non owned OAL over another. The alternative would seem to be to tell the DL & UA pilots they have to come after RAH and the half dozen special relationship vendors on AA flights too. Then it will have created a scenario where vendor/contractors always come ahead first on all legacy carriers.
Here’s the debate going on....
Republic Airline Unilateral JS Action
Endeavor is H-1 priority
Other DCI carriers are H-2
OAL 121 with recip agreements are H-3
It appears their main beef is they don't get priority on a non-RAH American Eagle flights or AA mainline flights....they aer considered an OAL like us and UA, so if we get to gate first, we get the jump.
#4
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2011
Posts: 4,503
I guess I’m not understanding here. Our jumpseat priority goes:
Delta
Endeavor
Non wholly owned Delta connection
OAL
Yours is (correct me if i’m wrong because thats what i’m picking up on from reading)
AA
FCFS
And you want them to give you priority on their metal when you dont give it to them on yours?
Delta
Endeavor
Non wholly owned Delta connection
OAL
Yours is (correct me if i’m wrong because thats what i’m picking up on from reading)
AA
FCFS
And you want them to give you priority on their metal when you dont give it to them on yours?
#5
Exactly
At DL & UA an AA pilot comes after these OAL contractors
At AA a DL or UA guy is treated fairly by check in time with every non owned OAL
That is not an equitable fair jumpseat reciprocal agreement.
The two possible outcomes are:
1.) DL & UA start treating all non owned OAL the same by check in time, or;
2.)AA would have to start putting RAH and other contractors ahead of DL and UA pilots regardless of check in time.
What’s going on now is not fair to the AA pilots.
Lastly jumpseats are supposed to be a pilot benefit, not a corporate benefit. Giving priority to one non owned over another because that guy may have a 1/3rd chance of flying one of their feed flights, is putting corporate purposes and needs into the mix ahead of pilot needs. It doesn’t belong there.
At DL & UA an AA pilot comes after these OAL contractors
At AA a DL or UA guy is treated fairly by check in time with every non owned OAL
That is not an equitable fair jumpseat reciprocal agreement.
The two possible outcomes are:
1.) DL & UA start treating all non owned OAL the same by check in time, or;
2.)AA would have to start putting RAH and other contractors ahead of DL and UA pilots regardless of check in time.
What’s going on now is not fair to the AA pilots.
Lastly jumpseats are supposed to be a pilot benefit, not a corporate benefit. Giving priority to one non owned over another because that guy may have a 1/3rd chance of flying one of their feed flights, is putting corporate purposes and needs into the mix ahead of pilot needs. It doesn’t belong there.
#6
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Posts: 2,767
Exactly
At DL & UA an AA pilot comes after these OAL contractors
At AA a DL or UA guy is treated fairly by check in time with every non owned OAL
That is not an equitable fair jumpseat reciprocal agreement.
The two possible outcomes are:
1.) DL & UA start treating all non owned OAL the same by check in time, or;
2.)AA would have to start putting RAH and other contractors ahead of DL and UA pilots regardless of check in time.
What’s going on now is not fair to the AA pilots.
Lastly jumpseats are supposed to be a pilot benefit, not a corporate benefit. Giving priority to one non owned over another because that guy may have a 1/3rd chance of flying one of their feed flights, is putting corporate purposes and needs into the mix ahead of pilot needs. It doesn’t belong there.
At DL & UA an AA pilot comes after these OAL contractors
At AA a DL or UA guy is treated fairly by check in time with every non owned OAL
That is not an equitable fair jumpseat reciprocal agreement.
The two possible outcomes are:
1.) DL & UA start treating all non owned OAL the same by check in time, or;
2.)AA would have to start putting RAH and other contractors ahead of DL and UA pilots regardless of check in time.
What’s going on now is not fair to the AA pilots.
Lastly jumpseats are supposed to be a pilot benefit, not a corporate benefit. Giving priority to one non owned over another because that guy may have a 1/3rd chance of flying one of their feed flights, is putting corporate purposes and needs into the mix ahead of pilot needs. It doesn’t belong there.
Personally I think the DL and UA agreements are smarter, this first come first serve thing is five years new? Just switch it back to industry standard and give ur contractors a hug. Itll pay off later i promise.
#7
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 648
Well i think the corporate benefit is really just making sure a regional pilot later flying mainline passengers around wont need a pos space ticket. And a mainline pilot can benefit from mainline corporate entity paying their bills and assigning them work so you have some higher priority than the guy who doesnt pay the bills.
Personally I think the DL and UA agreements are smarter, this first come first serve thing is five years new? Just switch it back to industry standard and give ur contractors a hug. Itll pay off later i promise.
Personally I think the DL and UA agreements are smarter, this first come first serve thing is five years new? Just switch it back to industry standard and give ur contractors a hug. Itll pay off later i promise.
#8
Well i think the corporate benefit is really just making sure a regional pilot later flying mainline passengers around wont need a pos space ticket. And a mainline pilot can benefit from mainline corporate entity paying their bills and assigning them work so you have some higher priority than the guy who doesnt pay the bills.
Personally I think the DL and UA agreements are smarter, this first come first serve thing is five years new? Just switch it back to industry standard and give ur contractors a hug. Itll pay off later i promise.
Personally I think the DL and UA agreements are smarter, this first come first serve thing is five years new? Just switch it back to industry standard and give ur contractors a hug. Itll pay off later i promise.
You’re argument is that a guy who flys only for AA because he’s based at an all AA flying base for a contractor should come ahead of an AA mainline guy on a DL & UA flight.......
And another RAH guy that flys only from a base doing UA flights should still come ahead of an AA mainline guy on a DL flight regardless of check in time.
#9
#10
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Dec 2017
Posts: 2,767
AA likes their deal then let them keep it. I think its safe to say UA and DL are happy with our arrangement.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
EngineOut
Regional
153
05-10-2017 10:12 AM