Green Slips vs Hiring
#21
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2007
Position: Left seat of a little plane
Posts: 2,396
I disagree with this statement. Most guys are greedy and have no intention of going early. Just met one of the 350 captains who made $1 million in 2018. He stayed to the absolute end even though he made $1 million at 63 years old in one year. He made nowhere near that laat year. I'm on the 737 in Atlanta. Most guys I fly with are over 60. The majority have no intention what-so-ever of leaving early and most of them fly to the max. They will work 30 days a month if they could.
Our pilot group has spoken through actions. We will fight over any and every green slip. QOL is not important to the majority, only money.
Our pilot group has spoken through actions. We will fight over any and every green slip. QOL is not important to the majority, only money.
Example. I flew three GS in August. I also bid reserve. Even though it is coded as a "G" on the daily trip coverage, a reserve GS functions more like a GSWC due to the payback day feature. Due to the PB days, I worked LESS than if I didn't put in for a GS at all, and made more money. Also, long after the bids closed I found out about an important day I really needed off, but was scheduled over an on call day. Thanks to the PB days, I ended up getting the day off after all, with a lot more money to boot. Sounds like a huge increase in "QOL" to me.
#22
I'm all for more hiring to avoid the ridiculous GS mania we've seen this year. I'd actually like to see a max limit of the LCW to be dropped significantly...closer to 75-80.
#23
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Nov 2016
Posts: 2,544
I don’t think people are hating on the people flying GS. I wasn’t, I flew a couple this year when they worked out for me. I think the hating is directed more towards the staffing levels.
#24
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2015
Posts: 341
On the 330, I'd say about half of the Captains I fly with have gone/plan to go early. That said, many of them at least still have a decent, albeit frozen, pension. Isn't the average age of our retirees ~62.5?
I wouldn't say majority at all. Sure there are some that do everything they can to fly more GSs, but there are plenty more out there who rarely, if ever, fly them. Month after month, you tend to see the same names and GSs are flown by a relatively small percentage of the pilot group. Also how many of them are flown by reserves, who would likely have flown anyway, but now for more money and payback days? There is some serious QOL in that.
I'm all for more hiring to avoid the ridiculous GS mania we've seen this year. I'd actually like to see a max limit of the LCW to be dropped significantly...closer to 75-80.
I wouldn't say majority at all. Sure there are some that do everything they can to fly more GSs, but there are plenty more out there who rarely, if ever, fly them. Month after month, you tend to see the same names and GSs are flown by a relatively small percentage of the pilot group. Also how many of them are flown by reserves, who would likely have flown anyway, but now for more money and payback days? There is some serious QOL in that.
I'm all for more hiring to avoid the ridiculous GS mania we've seen this year. I'd actually like to see a max limit of the LCW to be dropped significantly...closer to 75-80.
#25
Not to open old wounds...but ...i flew with a lot of North dudes after the merger and all I heard for years was how they got hosed and how the merger sucked blah blah blah. Fast forward to now and you know how many of those guys retired early?? Close to zero that i know of. But they are some of the biggest GS *****s and making more money than they ever dreamed of if they were still flying their Whale to the Orient.
#26
Banned
Joined APC: Dec 2018
Posts: 648
I'm not hating on them. Good for them for working so I don't have to. I'm just saying that management painted themselves in a corner this summer and we, as a whole, were more than happy to fly 40,000 GS days to help them out. Even though everyone is complaining about how short staffed we were, the real message we sent was "fine! I'll save your bacon for cash but I'm going to do it under public protest (but private elation). And I'll do it over and over." So even if management let out a collective sigh of relief in September over some very close calls in staffing, going forward they will always operate knowing "if we irresponsibly staff the airline, we can just throw money at it and the pilots will give up everything to fly."
#27
Due to the PB days, I worked LESS than if I didn't put in for a GS at all, and made more money. Also, long after the bids closed I found out about an important day I really needed off, but was scheduled over an on call day. Thanks to the PB days, I ended up getting the day off after all, with a lot more money to boot. Sounds like a huge increase in "QOL" to me.
Month after month, you tend to see the same names and GSs are flown by a relatively small percentage of the pilot group. Also how many of them are flown by reserves, who would likely have flown anyway, but now for more money and payback days? There is some serious QOL in that.
#28
Management has been playing bumper bowling with the staffing levels for quite some time. A couple years ago we were a little fat, so they played around with longer layovers and trip credit to improve the reliability of the operation. As they crunched the data and played around with the optimizer they aimed for the middle of the lane, but hit the other bumper when the MAX was added to the mix.
#29
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2008
Posts: 4,920
The swap board is a huge QOL improvement for those looking to drop trips. SWP is also a way to take hours out of the pot and therefore reduce the amount of reserves required and potentially turn black days into blue. Depending on the month, I've swapped above 100 or used the P2P board to drop down below 50. Its a good way to improve QOL across multiple months of flying.
Ixnay on the PB day. That info is way to useful to be on the interwebs.
Many 777 As have a similar plan. Some just scale back and coast through the last couple years by dropping trips.
Just flew with an A who is has been working the GS, PB combo for quite some time. He also has a plan to use the extra $$ to leave early.
Ixnay on the PB day. That info is way to useful to be on the interwebs.
Many 777 As have a similar plan. Some just scale back and coast through the last couple years by dropping trips.
Just flew with an A who is has been working the GS, PB combo for quite some time. He also has a plan to use the extra $$ to leave early.
Not insulting anyone. I respect their decisions. I'm just saying that you're wrong on this. It's a nice thought, but it's not what's happening.
#30
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: May 2015
Position: Power top
Posts: 2,959
I don't believe the pilot that flew the most greenslips this year will also be nominated for the Chairman's Club basing on his/her altruism. It's a management tool that is detrimental to the many while rewarding the few. Opposite of what union membership is all about.
I don't care what the rest of you guys do, really. I prefer time off more than the money. But don't expect the company to change it's practices as long as the collective "we" grab the money. I flew with a DC9 captain in the late 80's making close to $500k. Or so he bragged. It's our culture.
I don't care what the rest of you guys do, really. I prefer time off more than the money. But don't expect the company to change it's practices as long as the collective "we" grab the money. I flew with a DC9 captain in the late 80's making close to $500k. Or so he bragged. It's our culture.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post